Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 34(6): 3339-3347, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39167206

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The radial nerve may be painfully irritated or damaged by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of humeral fractures. Secondary radial nerve lesions after ORIF of humeral shaft fractures are described in up to 16%. Not only peripheral nerves but also orthopaedic instruments and osteosynthesis material are well visible by ultrasound. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound in assessing the relation between the bone overlapping screw tips and the radial nerve close to the humeral bone. METHODS: Ultrasound-guided drilling was used to place screws as close as possible to the radial nerve in 8 humeral bones of four cadavers. The relation between the radial nerve and the screw tips was assessed by high-resolution ultrasound, and the overlap of all screw tips over the bone was measured by ultrasound and fluoroscopy. Thereafter, the findings were validated by anatomical dissection. RESULTS: We could correctly identify all screw tips and their relation to the radial nerve by ultrasound. In 7 of 8 cases, the screw tip had direct contact with the radial nerve. The overlaying length of the screw tip was accurately measured by using ultrasound in all cases. In contrast fluoroscopy underestimated this length in 50% of cases. CONCLUSION: With this study, we show that ultrasound can reliable visualize the screw tips and its relation to the radial nerve. Ultrasound is a promising diagnostic tool to evaluate patients with radial nerve irritations or lesions after ORIF of humeral fractures. Furthermore, ultrasound could be an adequate tool to guide drilling.


Asunto(s)
Tornillos Óseos , Cadáver , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas del Húmero , Nervio Radial , Humanos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Nervio Radial/lesiones , Nervio Radial/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Húmero/cirugía , Fracturas del Húmero/diagnóstico por imagen , Tornillos Óseos/efectos adversos , Fluoroscopía/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Ultrasonografía/métodos
3.
Praxis (Bern 1994) ; 111(14): 797-813, 2022.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36285410

RESUMEN

Noninvasive Treatments for Acute and Chronic Back Pain Abstract. The therapy of back pain - especially the medication with opioids - can be challenging for the treating physician. Specific back pain can often be diagnosed by imaging and successfully treated by surgery or medication. In contrast, nonspecific back pain can be worsened by inappropriate imaging, questionable surgical indications and uncontrolled drug use. For the therapy of nonspecific back pain, maintaining daily activity and exercise therapy is central. Opioids are effective drugs for short-term use. However, long-term use often leads to opioid-induced hyperalgesia and hormonal dysfunction with decreased quality of life and libido. Furthermore, opioids can lead to abuse and addiction. After an ineffective treatment with non-opioids, opioids may be given for a limited time period (if possible shorter than four weeks) according to international guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Dolor de Espalda/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Enfermedad Aguda
4.
Praxis (Bern 1994) ; 110(10): 579-589, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34344186

RESUMEN

Peripheral Regional Anaesthesia for Perioperative Analgesia Abstract. Peripheral regional anaesthesia is the actual gold standard of opioid-sparing perioperative analgesia and is mainly used for surgery of the shoulder, arm and leg. Well-trained anaesthesiologists are the prerequisite for the correct individual risk-benefit assessment and the performance of the nerve blocks using a combination of ultrasound guidance and peripheral nerve stimulation (dual guidance). The postoperative care of the patients requires trained staff.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia de Conducción , Bloqueo Nervioso , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio , Analgésicos Opioides , Humanos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Ultrasonografía
5.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 28(6): 1033-1039, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30713061

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the feasibility and reliability of high-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS) of the radial nerve in the early, postoperative period after operative stabilization of humeral shaft fractures. METHODS: This study enrolled patients between September 2015 and April 2018 with a humeral shaft fracture who were assessed with HRUS within 2 weeks after surgery. Based on the ultrasound artifacts, the examiners subjectively defined quality of ultrasound as "bad" or "good." The cross-sectional area of the radial and the posterior interosseous nerve was recorded at predefined locations. The radial nerve was scanned axially in the whole course to identify nerve continuity. RESULTS: Of 44 patients who underwent operations for humeral shaft fracture, HRUS was used to assess 15 patients at an average 4.8 ± 2.6 days (range, 2-11 days) after surgery. The examiners defined ultrasound quality as "good" in 13 of 15 patients (~87%). Primary radial nerve palsy (RNP) was identified in 3 of the 15 patients, and 4 sustained secondary RNP. Nerve continuity was demonstrated by HRUS in every patient. In patients with RNP, nerve continuity was secondarily confirmed by surgical exploration or functional and electrophysiological recovery. CONCLUSION: Early postoperative HRUS of the radial nerve after osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures is a feasible and reliable method to identify radial nerve continuity. In case of pathology, this assessment tool can additionally provide valuable information concerning location and etiology of the RNP.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Húmero/cirugía , Nervio Radial/diagnóstico por imagen , Neuropatía Radial/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Humanos , Fracturas del Húmero/rehabilitación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Ultrasonografía , Adulto Joven
7.
Pain Med ; 18(5): 924-931, 2017 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27651513

RESUMEN

Objective: Intrathecal drug delivery (ITDD) is commonly used for intractable pain management. A paucity of good-quality studies in chronic noncancer patients and concerns over increased dosages have focused interest on different modes of administration. The aim of this international multicenter randomized double-blind crossover trial was to compare the efficacy of the same daily dose of drugs administered by intermittent boluses vs simple continuous infusion. Methods: Eligible patients implanted with a programmable ITDD device were randomized to receive two weeks of either intermittent boluses or a simple continuous flow in period 1, followed by a crossover to the alternative mode of administration. The primary outcome measure was the Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale. Results: The mean proportion of positive responders (at least "minimally improved") was 38.4% in the continuous condition vs 37.3% in the bolus (difference in proportions = 1.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -21.8-24.0%, P = 0.93). The mean PGIC in the continuous condition was 3.8 vs 3.9 in the bolus (mean difference = -0.1, -0.6-0.4, P = 0.72). Exploratory analyses revealed a tendency for the mean proportion of positive responders to be higher at low vs high flow rates for both bolus and continuous administrations. Two patients were withdrawn from the study due to adverse events during the bolus phase, both with symptoms of increased pain, and one patient with additional symptoms of numbness and urinary retention. Conclusion: The mean PGIC and proportion of positive responders was not substantially different after intermittent bolus vs continuous administration.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Autoevaluación Diagnóstica , Bombas de Infusión Implantables , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Intratable/diagnóstico , Dolor Intratable/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Cruzados , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas/instrumentación , Inyecciones Espinales/instrumentación , Inyecciones Espinales/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Intratable/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA