Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Neurol ; 42(6): 404-8, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20472191

RESUMEN

In this retrospective cohort study, a clinical and administrative database of children hospitalized at Primary Children's Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2006, was used to identify those with laboratory-confirmed rotavirus infections and at least one seizure. In all, 59 children were identified, 34 of whom (58%) had no other potential medical explanation for their seizures. Of these 34 children, 23 (68%) were afebrile at seizure onset and 11 were febrile. Electroencephalography was performed for 21 of the 34 children (62%); all findings were normal, except for a child with slowing related to cerebral edema. Twenty-six of the 34 children (76%) had neuroimaging studies; all findings were normal, except for the child with cerebral edema and a child with an incidental arachnoid cyst. Twenty of the 34 children (59%) had a lumbar puncture; again, all findings were normal. All 34 children recovered uneventfully, including the 6 children who spent at least 1 day in an intensive care unit. Follow-up data on 27 of these children identified 2 children (7%) who required chronic anticonvulsant therapy. The results indicate that seizures associated with rotavirus infection are a relatively benign neurologic condition in young children. With few exceptions, neurodiagnostic studies do not influence management or outcome.


Asunto(s)
Gastroenteritis/complicaciones , Infecciones por Rotavirus/complicaciones , Convulsiones/complicaciones , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Electroencefalografía , Femenino , Gastroenteritis/virología , Humanos , Lactante , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Convulsiones/virología , Punción Espinal , Utah
2.
Vaccine ; 21(25-26): 3746-50, 2003 Sep 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12922107

RESUMEN

Since 1966, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has recommended tetanus-diphtheria toxoid (Td) be used instead of single antigen tetanus toxoid (TT) because, while both vaccines protect against tetanus, only Td protects against diphtheria. Despite this recommendation, approximately 2.5 million doses of TT were distributed annually from 1991 to 1997. One possible explanation for the continued use of TT is concern about the relative safety of Td. Small clinical trials found Td to be associated with a higher rate of local vaccine-associated adverse events (VAEs) than TT. To determine if the findings from the trials would hold up on a larger scale, we compared the rate of reporting to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a passive reporting system, after either vaccine from 1991 to 1997. There were 40 reports per million doses of Td, and 27 reports per million doses of TT, for a reporting rate ratio of 1.4. Reporting rates to VAERS are lower than the rates of VAEs identified in the clinical trials, but the magnitude of the difference in VAEs following TT versus Td is similar. While reporting rates are lower after TT than Td, rates of reported VAEs after both vaccines are low.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra Difteria y Tétanos/efectos adversos , Toxoide Tetánico/efectos adversos , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Anciano , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA