RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Failure to thrive, brief resolved unexplained event, accidental ingestion, and drowning admissions commonly involve social work (SW) consultation. Care team biases likely influence SW consultation decisions. We examined whether SW consultations varied by patient race for these diagnoses. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children <6 years of age admitted for failure to thrive, brief resolved unexplained event, accidental ingestion, and drowning between July 1, 2012 and June 30, 2020 at a single, academic, standalone children's hospital in an urban environment. The outcome was SW consultation; the predictor was patient race. We used multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for ethnicity, language, insurance, and diagnosis. We completed a supplemental chart review of a random sample of 10% of patients with SW consultation to determine the reasons that consultations were placed. RESULTS: We included 1199 unique patients; 64% identified as white, and 22% identified as Black. Black patients had 1.61 times higher adjusted odds of SW consultation compared with white patients (95% confidence interval 1.14-2.29). Publicly insured, compared with privately insured, patients had 6.10 times higher adjusted odds of SW consultation (95% confidence interval 4.28-8.80). Upon supplemental chart review, Black patients had SW consultations that focused more often on abuse, neglect, and safety; this was also found for publicly insured patients. There was parity in consultation for resource needs across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Black children were more likely than white children to receive SW consultation during hospitalization, as were publicly insured children compared with their privately insured peers; in supplemental review, this was not due to differences in consultations for resource needs. The standardization of SW consultation may promote equitable care.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pediatric hospitalizations are costly, stressful events for families. Many caregivers, especially those with lower incomes, struggle to afford food while their child is hospitalized. We sought to decrease the mean percentage of caregivers of Medicaid-insured and uninsured children who reported being hungry during their child's hospitalization from 86% to <24%. METHODS: Our quality improvement efforts took place on a 41-bed inpatient unit at our large, urban academic hospital. Our multidisciplinary team included physicians, nurses, social workers, and food services leadership. Our primary outcome measure was caregiver-reported hunger; we asked caregivers near to the time of discharge if they experienced hunger during their child's hospitalization. Plan-do-study-act cycles addressed key drivers: awareness of how to obtain food, safe environment for families to seek help, and access to affordable food. An annotated statistical process control chart tracked our outcome over time. Data collection was interrupted because of the COVID-19 pandemic; we used that time to advocate for hospital-funded support for optimal and sustainable changes to caregiver meal access. RESULTS: We decreased caregiver hunger from 86% to 15.5%. A temporary test of change, 2 meal vouchers per caregiver per day, resulted in a special cause decrease in the percentage of caregivers reporting hunger. Permanent hospital funding was secured to provide cards to purchase 2 meals per caregiver per hospital day, resulting in a sustained decrease in rates of caregiver hunger. CONCLUSIONS: We decreased caregivers' hunger during their child's hospitalization. Through a data-driven quality improvement effort, we implemented a sustainable change allowing families to access enough food.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Adults with a history of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) (eg, abuse) have suboptimal health outcomes. Resilience may blunt this effect. The effect of parental ACEs (and resilience) on coping with challenges involving their children (eg, hospitalization) is unclear. We sought to quantify ACE and resilience scores for parents of hospitalized children and evaluate their associations to parental coping after discharge. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study at a children's hospital (August 2015-May 2016). Eligible participants were English-speaking parents of children hospitalized on the Hospital Medicine or Complex Services team. The ACE questionnaire measured the responding parent's past adversity (ACE range: 0-10; ≥4 ACEs = high adversity). The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) was used to measure their resilience (range: 1-5; higher is better). The primary outcome was measured by using the Post-Discharge Coping Difficulty Scale via a phone call 14 days post-discharge (range: 0-100; higher is worse). Associations were assessed by using multivariable linear regression, adjusting for parent- and patient-level covariates. RESULTS: A total of 671 (81% of eligible parents) responded. Respondents were primarily women (90%), employed (66%), and had at least a high school degree (65%); 60% of children were white, 54% were publicly insured. Sixty-four percent of parents reported ≥1 ACE; 19% had ≥4 ACEs. The mean Brief Resilience Scale score for parents was 3.95. In adjusted analyses, higher ACEs and lower resilience were significantly associated with more difficulty coping after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: More parental adversity and less resilience are associated with parental coping difficulties after discharge, representing potentially important levers for transition-focused interventions.

Asunto(s)