RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Occupational psychosocial stress has been identified as a risk factor for obesity, whereas dietary habits have a key role in weight control. We examined whether dietary habits modify the association between occupational psychosocial factors and waist circumference. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Data comprised 31-year-old men (n=2222) and women (n=2053) in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966. Waist circumference was measured and data on occupational psychosocial factors (demands, control and social support) and other characteristics were obtained through questionnaires. Healthy and unhealthy diet indices were constructed according to the current dietary guidelines. Associations were examined using analysis of variance adjusted for body mass index at age 14, basic education level, leisure-time physical activity, alcohol consumption, smoking, stress-related eating behaviour and parity. RESULTS: Among men, high job demands and high job control were associated with greater waist circumferences, and there were interactions between unhealthy diet and job demands (P=0.043) and job control (P=0.036) in relation to waist circumference. The waist of men with high demands or high control and low consumption of unhealthy foods (red/processed meat, hamburgers and pizzas, fried potatoes, sugar-sweetened soft drinks and white bread) was smaller than that of men with high demands or high control and high consumption of such foods. No associations were found among women. CONCLUSIONS: A diet based on the current dietary guidelines seems to cancel out the adverse effects of occupational psychosocial factors on waist circumference among young men. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess the risks for obesity-related diseases arising from psychosocial work environments and dietary habits.

Asunto(s)

Dieta/efectos adversos , Conducta Alimentaria/psicología , Enfermedades Profesionales/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Circunferencia de la Cintura , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Índice de Masa Corporal , Ingestión de Alimentos/fisiología , Empleo/psicología , Femenino , Finlandia , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidad/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Apoyo Social , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Carga de Trabajo/psicología

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether workplace support, sociodemographic factors and co-morbidity are associated with early retirement or non-employment due to other reasons among breast cancer survivors. We also compared quality of life and chronic symptoms (pain, fatigue, anxiety and depression) among employed, retired and other non-employed breast cancer survivors. METHODS: We identified breast cancer survivors diagnosed between 1997 and 2002 from either a hospital or a cancer registry in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway (NOCWO study). All patients had been treated with curative intent. Information on employment, co-morbidity and support was collected via a questionnaire. The sample included 1111 working-aged cancer-free survivors who had been employed at the time of diagnosis. We used multinomial logistic regression models to analyse the association of various determinants with early retirement and other non-employment (due to unemployment, subsidized employment or being a homemaker). RESULTS: Low education, low physical quality of life, co-morbidity and pain were associated with both early retirement and other non-employment after cancer. Other non-employed survivors also rated their mental quality of life as lower and experienced anxiety and fatigue more often than all the other survivors. Moreover, they reported a lower level of supervisor support after their diagnosis than the employed survivors. Retired survivors more often reported weak support from colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in ill health and functional status between various groups of non-employed cancer survivors need to be considered when planning policy measures for improving the labour market participation of this population and preventing their early withdrawal from working life.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Jubilación/estadística & datos numéricos , Sobrevivientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Desempleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/psicología , Escolaridad , Empleo/psicología , Fatiga/epidemiología , Fatiga/psicología , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Humanos , Islandia/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega/epidemiología , Dolor/epidemiología , Dolor/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Jubilación/psicología , Factores de Riesgo , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Desempleo/psicología

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cancer can cause adverse effects on survivors' work ability. We compared the self-assessed work ability of breast, testicular, and prostate cancer survivors to that of people without cancer. We also investigated the association of disease-related and socio-demographic factors and job-related resources (organizational climate, social support, and avoidance behavior) with work ability and looked at whether these associations were different for the survivors and reference subjects. METHODS: Working aged cancer patients diagnosed between 1997 and 2002 were identified from hospital or cancer registries in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, and Norway (Nordic Study on Cancer and Work). A cancer-free reference group was selected from population registries. We collected information on work ability and other factors from 1,490 employed survivors and 2,796 reference subjects via a questionnaire. RESULTS: The adjusted mean value of work ability was slightly lower among the breast and prostate cancer survivors compared to the cancer-free population. Co-morbidity, chemotherapy, low workplace support, and low organizational commitment were associated with reduced work ability. Avoidance behavior from supervisors or colleagues was only related to work ability among the cancer survivors. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: More attention should be paid to assisting cancer survivors in work life, particularly those who have chronic diseases or have undergone chemotherapy. Although most factors affecting the work ability of the survivors and reference subjects were the same, survivors' work ability seemed to be particularly sensitive to avoidance behavior. The results suggest that there is a need to improve communication at the workplace and develop supportive leadership practices in order to avoid isolating behavior towards cancer survivors.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias de la Mama/fisiopatología , Ocupaciones , Neoplasias de la Próstata/fisiopatología , Sobrevivientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Testiculares/fisiopatología , Evaluación de Capacidad de Trabajo , Adulto , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Femenino , Finlandia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Islandia , Relaciones Interpersonales , Linfoma/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros , Muestreo , Países Escandinavos y Nórdicos , Aislamiento Social , Apoyo Social , Encuestas y Cuestionarios

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency of changes in work situation due to cancer and to analyze the association of physically demanding work, social support from supervisors, colleagues or occupational health services, and disease-related factors, with changing employers due to cancer. METHODS: Working-aged patients with breast, testicular or prostate cancer, or lymphoma with a good prognosis between 1997 and 2002 were identified from a hospital or cancer registry in four Nordic countries. The registers provided data on the disease-related factors. Information on changes in work situation, received support, and other work-related factors was collected using a questionnaire (response rate 72%). The frequency of changes in work situation was evaluated among a total of 2030 survivors. Further analyses were carried out among 688 survivors using a multivariable logistic regression model, to investigate factors affecting the risk of changing employers due to cancer. RESULTS: Altogether, 5-10% of cancer survivors had changed employers, occupations or work tasks, 5% had been unemployed, and 9% had retired due to cancer. The physical demands of previous work were the most important reason behind changing employers after cancer. Among women, weak support from supervisors and occupational health personnel increased the risk of changing employers because of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of cancer survivors changed employers, occupations, or work tasks because of cancer. Supervisors' support in the form of lightening physically demanding jobs and taking illness into consideration when planning work tasks, and health-care workers' advice on coping at work may help survivors to maintain their jobs.

Asunto(s)

Empleo , Neoplasias/psicología , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Empleo/psicología , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/psicología , Humanos , Islandia/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Linfoma no Hodgkin/psicología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Reorganización del Personal , Apoyo Social , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Neoplasias Testiculares/psicología

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lead exposure is known to be harmful to the male reproductive system, including impairment of fertility. However, it is unclear whether currently existing low levels of exposure have this effect. AIMS: To study retrospectively current workers in lead using industries (battery manufacture, smelting, etc), and in non-lead using control industries, in four European countries, with Time To Pregnancy as the outcome variable, as part of the EU funded Asclepios Project. METHODS: Exposure assessment was mainly by blood lead values, which were available from the late 1970s, supplemented by imputed values where necessary. Three exposure models were studied: (1) short term (recent) exposure; (2) total duration of work in a lead using industry; and (3) cumulative exposure. A Cox proportional hazards model with discrete ties was used for the statistical analysis, with covariates for both partners. RESULTS: A total of 1104 subjects took part, of whom 638 were occupationally exposed to lead at the relevant time. Blood lead levels were mainly less than 50 microg/dl. No consistent association of Time To Pregnancy with lead exposure was found in any of the exposure models, although reduced fertility was observed in one category each in models (2) and (3). CONCLUSIONS: This basically negative result is unlikely to be due to the misclassification of key variables, to insufficient statistical power, or to bias, for example, response bias. If any impairment of male reproductive function exists at the levels of occupational lead exposure now current, it does not appear to reduce biological fertility.

Asunto(s)

Infertilidad Masculina/inducido químicamente , Plomo/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Embarazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Plomo/sangre , Masculino , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición Paterna/efectos adversos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo

RESUMEN

The health professional who is involved in communicating information about reproductive risks from occupational hazards needs to consider several important aspects. Uncertainties in risk assessment, timing of exposure in relation to pregnancy, and the consequences of different preventive measures for the woman (family), as well as for the employer and other persons at the workplace are examples of such aspects. The basis for the pregnant woman's perception of risk must be recognized. The risk-communication goal is that the persons concerned fully understand the risk and its possible consequences, so that they will be able to make informed decisions about how to act. More attention should be given to risk communication in the training of health professionals.