RESUMEN
Recent studies have shown that pyroptosis, an inflammatory form of cell death, has a dual role in tumorigenesis and tumour progression and affects the prognosis of patients; however, the role of pyroptosis in glioblastoma (GBM) is still unclear. In this study, based on GBM patients' data from two independent cohorts, we performed a comprehensive analysis of the expression and prognostic value of 33 pyroptosis-associated genes (PAGs) in GBM, as well as their role in the tumour immune microenvironment (TIME) of GBM. We identified 29 PAGs that were differentially expressed between GBM and normal brain tissue, 18 of which were upregulated in GBM tissue. Most of the 33 PAGs were strongly correlated with the levels of immune cell infiltration. Based on the 33 PAGs, the GBM samples can be divided into two clusters (C1-C2), with C1 having a 'hot' but immunosuppressive TIME and C2 having a 'cold' TIME, suggesting different immunotherapeutic responses in the two clusters. In addition, we identified four PAGs that were strongly associated with GBM prognosis and constructed a risk model based on these four PAGs. This risk model is an independent prognostic factor for GBM patients, and there is a different immune status between high- and low-risk groups. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that pyroptosis is closely associated with the prognosis and TIME of GBM and provides an important basis for further studies on the relationship between pyroptosis and GBM.
Asunto(s)
Glioblastoma , Glioblastoma/patología , Humanos , Piroptosis/genética , Microambiente Tumoral/genéticaRESUMEN
Background: Although the diagnosis and treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) is significantly improved with recent progresses, there is still a large heterogeneity in therapeutic effects and overall survival. The aim of this study is to analyze gene expressions of transcription factors (TFs) in GBM so as to discover new tumor markers. Methods: Differentially expressed TFs are identified by data mining using public databases. The GBM transcriptome profile is downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) method is used to cluster the differentially expressed genes to discover hub genes and signal pathways. The TFs affecting the prognosis of GBM are screened by univariate and multivariate COX regression analysis, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is determined. The GBM hazard model and nomogram map are constructed by integrating the clinical data. Finally, the TFs involving potential signaling pathways in GBM are screened by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), Gene Ontology (GO), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis. Results: There are 68 differentially expressed TFs in GBM, of which 43 genes are upregulated and 25 genes are downregulated. NMF clustering analysis suggested that GBM patients are divided into three groups: Clusters A, B, and C. LHX2, MEOX2, SNAI2, and ZNF22 are identified from the above differential genes by univariate/multivariate regression analysis. The risk score of those four genes are calculated based on the beta coefficient of each gene, and we found that the predictive ability of the risk score gradually increased with the prolonged predicted termination time by time-dependent ROC curve analysis. The nomogram results have showed that the integration of risk score, age, gender, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and 1p/19q can further improve predictive ability towards the survival of GBM. The pathways in cancer, phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3K)-Akt signaling, Hippo signaling, and proteoglycans, are highly enriched in high-risk groups by GSEA. These genes are mainly involved in cell migration, cell adhesion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), cell cycle, and other signaling pathways by GO and KEGG analysis. Conclusion: The four-factor combined scoring model of LHX2, MEOX2, SNAI2, and ZNF22 can precisely predict the prognosis of patients with GBM.