Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Heart J ; 25(17): 1550-8, 2004 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15342175

RESUMEN

AIMS: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) for carotid artery stenoses has become an alternative to carotid endarterectomy. However, CAS itself can cause cerebral ischaemic events. Embolic protection devices (PD) promise to reduce the incidence of these events. METHODS AND RESULTS: From July 1996 to March 2003, 1483 patients from 26 hospitals were included in the prospective CAS Registry of the ALKK study group. A PD was used in 668 of 1483 patients (45%). The use of a PD has grown rapidly over the years and reached 100% in 2003. Patients treated with a PD had prior carotid artery dilatation more often (3.5% versus 1%, p < 0.001), a prior myocardial infarction (34% versus 27.4%, p = 0.007) and a history of arterial hypertension (89.9% versus 78.6%, p = 0.007) compared to patients treated without a PD. A thrombus was more often visible in patients treated under distal protection (16.5% versus 8%, p < 0.001). The use of a PD led to a 10-min longer intervention (45 min versus 35 min median, p < 0.001). Patients treated with a PD had a lower rate of ipsilateral stroke (1.7% versus 4.1%, p = 0.007) and a lower rate of all non-fatal strokes and all deaths (2.1% versus 4.9%, p = 0.004) during the hospital stay. This was confirmed by multiple logistic regression analysis (adjusted OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.23-0.91, p = 0.026). A similar reduction could be found for symptomatic as well as asymptomatic carotid artery stenoses. CONCLUSION: Since 1996 there has been a steady increase in the use of PDs for CAS, with a 100% use in 2003. The use of a PD may lower the rate of ipsilateral strokes during CAS.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Embolia Intracraneal/prevención & control , Stents , Anciano , Amaurosis Fugax/etiología , Amaurosis Fugax/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Regresión , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control
2.
Am J Cardiol ; 92(3): 285-8, 2003 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12888133

RESUMEN

In clinical practice, we found no significant difference between atorvastatin therapy or other statin therapies in the clinical outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes receiving clopidogrel therapy. In patients receiving atorvastatin therapy, clopidogrel therapy was associated with a significant decrease in mortality and stroke during univariate analysis and a moderate trend of reduced mortality and stroke without statistical significance in the multivariate analysis.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácidos Heptanoicos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Ticlopidina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Atorvastatina , Clopidogrel , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad Coronaria/mortalidad , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Análisis de Supervivencia , Síndrome , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA