RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMR) is an effective treatment for relief of refractory angina. This benefit may be mediated by increase in myocardial perfusion or by cardiac denervation. We investigate the efficacy of TMR and thoracic sympathectomy (TS) for relief of angina and whether any clinical benefit is associated with enhanced myocardial perfusion. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with nonrevascularizable coronary arteries and intractable angina were prospectively randomized to have TMR by holmium: yttrium aluminum garnet laser or TS. Subjects were clinically evaluated before, and for 42 months after, surgery. They underwent exercise tolerance testing and rest and stress quantitative perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before, and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: The demographics of the two groups were similar. There was no perioperative mortality; however, two patients died in the TS group during follow-up. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina score improved from 3.4 +/- 0.5 to 2.6 +/- 1.1 (p = 0.06) in the TS group at 6 months but returned to 3.2 +/- 0.7 at 42 months, while in the TMR group it improved from 3.6 +/- 0.5 to 1.9 +/- 0.7 (p = 0.008) at 6 months and deteriorated to 2.5 +/- 0.9 (p = 0.01) after 42 months of surgery. The TMR-treated patients showed significant improvements in the SF-36 scores and Seattle Angina Questionnaire only at 6 months, whereas TS-treated patients did not show amelioration at any time during follow-up. The MRI protocol was completed in 15 of 20 (TMR = 8; TS = 7) patients and no significant differences in qualitative or quantitative perfusion variables were demonstrated in either group. CONCLUSIONS: A greater clinical benefit was obtained with TMR than with TS early after surgery but this clinical effect did not seem to be associated with improvement in myocardial perfusion as assessed by MRI and part of the beneficial effect was lost by 42 months after surgery.
Asunto(s)
Angina de Pecho/cirugía , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Revascularización Miocárdica/métodos , Simpatectomía , Anciano , Angina de Pecho/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Circulación Coronaria , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Tolerancia al Ejercicio , Femenino , Corazón/inervación , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Miocardio/patología , Neovascularización Fisiológica , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Toracotomía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transmyocardial laser revascularization is increasingly used to treat intractable angina in the absence of graftable vessels; however, its role in combination with coronary artery bypass grafting remains undefined. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the outcome of the combination therapy at mid-term follow-up. METHODS: Patients (n = 20) who had elective coronary artery bypass with one or more nongraftable coronary arteries were prospectively randomized to have either coronary artery bypass grafting alone or combination coronary artery bypass grafting plus transmyocardial laser revascularization with a holmium:YAG (yttrium-aluminum-garnet) laser to nongraftable areas. All patients had an exercise tolerance test preoperatively and at 6, 18, and 36 months follow-up. Stress echocardiography was performed on 17 patients at 18 months postoperatively, and regional wall motion score index was calculated in lased and nonlased nonrevascularizable myocardium of the left ventricle at rest and with dobutamine stress. RESULTS: Both groups of patients were similar in preoperative demographics and operative data. There was no perioperative death. There was no difference between the two groups in angina scoring at 6, 18, and 36 months follow-up. Exercise tolerance improved by a mean of 46.8 +/- 20.0 seconds in the coronary artery bypass grafting group versus 199.2 +/- 66.5 seconds per patient in the coronary artery bypass grafting plus transmyocardial laser revascularization group (p = 1.8 x10(-6)) at 6 months; this benefit was maintained at 18 months (157 +/- 46.3 versus 61 +/- 39.2 seconds; p = 4 x10(-4)) but was lost at 36 months (57.2. +/- 42.1 versus 68.1 +/- 46.7 seconds; p = 0.70). The mean values for wall motion score index in the lased and nonlased regions at each stage of dobutamine stress at 18 months after surgery were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of coronary artery bypass and transmyocardial laser revascularization improved exercise tolerance in patients in whom complete revascularization could not be achieved by bypass grafting alone in the short term, but this benefit was lost by 36 months postoperatively. The transient improvement in exercise tolerance cannot be explained by changes in contractility in the lased areas.