RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a major cause of long-term work disability. However, factors predicting this are not well known. METHOD: In the Vantaa Depression Study, predictors for being granted a disability pension during an 18-month follow-up were examined among the 186 psychiatric MDD in- and out-patients belonging to the labour force at baseline. RESULTS: The 21 patients (11.3%) granted a disability pension were significantly older, more hopeless, had worse social and occupational functioning, and spent more time depressed during follow-up. After adjusting for these predictors, being on sick leave at baseline still strongly predicted disability pension during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Disability pension is predicted by multiple sociodemographic and clinical factors. Baseline level of functioning and duration of depressive episodes are key clinical predictors. The positive and negative consequences of sick leave warrant closer attention.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Pensiones/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Demografía , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: New antidepressants emerged and became widely used during the 1990s. The present study investigated quality-of-care problems in the treatment of depression in a current psychiatric setting. METHOD: We investigated the treatment received for depression by all 803 inpatients or outpatients with a clinical diagnosis of ICD-10 depressive episode or recurrent depressive disorder in 1996 in the Peijas Medical Care District, which provides psychiatric services for citizens of Vantaa, a city in southern Finland. RESULTS: Most patients (84%) in the sample were found to have received antidepressants, generally in adequate, albeit low, doses. Inadequate antidepressant treatment was common only with tricyclic antidepressants. Most patients received a single antidepressant for extended periods; only 22% had 2 or more antidepressant trials. During the treatment period, disability pension was granted to 19% of those not already pensioned, two thirds (67%) of whom had received only 1 antidepressant trial prior to being granted a pension. CONCLUSION: The present study supports the emerging perception of improved quality of pharmacotherapy in psychiatric settings, with the exception of treatment with tricyclic antidepressants. Problems of quality of care now appear to be related to the suboptimal intensity and monitoring of the treatment provided. which may eventually result in considerable costs to society due to permanent disability.