RESUMEN
AIMS: While lifestyle factors are strongly associated with Type 2 diabetes (T2DM), genetic characteristics also play a role. However, much of the research on T2DM genetics focuses on European and Asian populations, leaving underrepresented groups, such as indigenous populations with high diabetes prevalence, understudied. METHODS: We characterized the molecular profile of 10 genes involved in T2DM risk through complete exome sequencing of 64 indigenous individuals belonging to 12 different Amazonian ethnic groups. RESULTS: The analysis revealed 157 variants, including four exclusive variants in the indigenous population located in the NOTCH2 and WFS1 genes with a modifier or moderate impact on protein effectiveness. Furthermore, a high impact variant in NOTCH2 was also found. Additionally, the frequency of 10 variants in the indigenous group showed significant differences when compared to other global populations that were evaluated. CONCLUSION: Our study identified 4 novel variants associated with T2DM in the NOTCH2 and WFS1 genes in the Amazonian indigenous populations we studied. In addition, a variant with a high predicted impact in NOTCH2 was also observed. These findings represent a valuable starting point for conducting further association and functional studies, which could help to improve our understanding of the unique characteristics of this population.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Pueblos Indígenas , Humanos , Brasil/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/genética , Etnicidad , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Pueblos Indígenas/genéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Investigate the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in an equatorial population through a large-sample study. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with 30,224 healthy individuals from the North Region, in Brazil (Amazônia - state of Pará), who had 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25(OH)D) and intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) serum levels measured by immunoassay method. Those with history of acute or chronic diseases were excluded. Abnormal levels of calcium, creatinine, glycemia and albumin were also exclusion criteria. RESULTS: 25(OH)D levels were 29.1 ± 8.2 ng/mL and values <12.7 ng/mL were equal to < -2 s.d. below average. Hypovitaminosis D was present in 10% of subjects according to the Institute of Medicine (values <20 ng/mL) and in 59%, in consonance with Endocrine Society (values 20-30 ng/mL as insufficiency and <20 ng/mL as deficiency) criteria. Individuals were divided according to four age brackets: children, adolescents, adults and elderly, and their 25(OH)D levels were: 33 ± 9; 28.5 ± 7.4; 28.3 ± 7.7; 29.3 ± 8.5 ng/mL, respectively. All groups differed in 25(OH)D, except adolescents vs adults. Regression model showed BMI, sex, living zone (urban or rural) and age as independent variables to 25(OH)D levels. Comparing subjects with vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL) to those with vitamin D insufficiency (20-30 ng/mL), a difference between PTH levels in these two groups was observed (95.9 ± 24.7 pg/mL vs 44.2 ± 64.5 pg/mL; P < 0.01). Additionally, the most accurate predictive vitamin D level for subclinical hyperparathyroidism in ROC curve was 26 ng/mL. CONCLUSION: Our equatorial population showed low prevalence of vitamin D hypovitaminosis ranging with age bracket. The insufficient category by Endocrine Society was corroborated by our PTH data.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is an important risk factor for vascular events. Recommendations about whether ankle-brachial index should be performed differ depending on the source; therefore, it is necessary to re-evaluate the most important risk factors associated with peripheral arterial disease and whether it is useful to perform ankle-brachial index in newly diagnosed and drug-naïve patients with diabetes, independent of age or peripheral arterial disease symptoms. METHODS: A total of 711 subjects were divided into groups: group 1, 600 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, symptomatic or not for peripheral arterial disease; group 2, 61 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients newly diagnosed and drug naïve; and group 3, 50 subjects without diabetes. Ankle-brachial index, medical records and physical examination were performed in all patients, accessing cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: Analysing group 1 asymptomatic patient to peripheral arterial disease, we found abnormal ankle-brachial index in 49% (77/156) ⩾50 years and 42% (16/38) <50 years (p = not significant). Considering drug-naïve patients, a peripheral arterial disease prevalence of 39% (24/61) was found; among these, 48% (13/27) were <50 years and 32% (11/34) were ⩾50 years (p = not significant). A forward stepwise regression model was developed, with type 2 diabetes mellitus duration (r2 = 0.12) and sedentary lifestyle (r2 = 0.14) found as independent variable predictors of severity of peripheral arterial disease, related to ankle-brachial index. CONCLUSION: We suggest that, in type 2 diabetes mellitus, ankle-brachial index should be measured at diagnosis. In addition, sedentary lifestyle was strongly associated with presence and severity of peripheral arterial disease.