RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) by DXA is underestimated in those with smaller bones and overestimated in those with larger bones. Trabecular bone score (TBS) predicts fracture risk, and is not influenced by bone size. The aim of this study was to evaluate TBS and BMD in women with short stature. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed DXA scans of all women aged 50-90 years with short stature (<144 cm) obtained in a single center, from 2006 to 2016. The comparison group comprised women >161 cm in height, matched for age and LS BMD, selected from the same database. RESULTS: The study population included 342 women. The two groups were similar in age, and aBMD at the LS and total hip. Femoral neck aBMD was lower in cases than in taller women. In contrast, TBS was higher in women with short stature than in their taller counterparts (1.347 ± 0.102 vs. 1.250 ± 0.110; p < 0.001). Bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) and the LS TBS-adjusted BMD T-score were also significantly higher in shorter than in taller women. From the entire cohort, 121 women (67 cases) were osteoporotic by aBMD determinations. Among these subjects, TBS was also greater in cases (1.303 ± 0.103) than in women with standard height (1.190 ± 0.099; p < 0.001). Despite being considered osteoporotic, 36% of short women, but none of the taller ones, had a normal TBS. CONCLUSIONS: TBS can be a useful adjunct to aBMD for assessing bone quality in short women, in whom aBMD measurement tends to read lower, and, thus could overestimate fracture risk.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

RESUMO Objetivos Descrever a utilização da contenção física em um hospital psiquiátrico público e analisar os fatores de risco associados com seu uso, no contexto da implantação de um protocolo clínico. Métodos Em um hospital psiquiátrico público de Belo Horizonte-MG, os formulários de registro e monitoramento de contenção física (2011-2012) foram analisados e comparados com os registros das demais internações englobadas no mesmo período. Neste estudo transversal, além das análises descritivas das características clínicas e demográficas dos pacientes contidos, das técnicas utilizadas e das complicações reportadas, os fatores de risco associados com o uso da contenção foram analisados por meio de regressão logística múltipla. Resultados A contenção foi utilizada em 13,4% das internações, sendo mais comum em pacientes jovens, do sexo masculino, portadores de psicoses não orgânicas, apresentando agitação/agressividade. A técnica foi geralmente de quatro pontos, durando entre 61-240 minutos. Os únicos fatores de risco significativos para o uso da contenção incluíram a idade (OR = 0,98; p = 0,008) e o tempo de permanência (OR = 1,01; p < 0,001). Conclusões A contenção física foi utilizada usualmente na abordagem aguda do paciente agitado/agressivo inabordável verbalmente, no contexto de um transtorno psicótico. O registro dos dados vitais e dos efeitos adversos foram os itens menos aderentes aos protocolos vigentes.

ABSTRACT Objectives To describe the use of physical restraint in a public psychiatric hospital and analyze the risk factors associated with its use in the context of the implementation of a clinical protocol. Methods In a public psychiatric hospital of Belo Horizonte-MG, registration forms for monitoring physical restraint (2011-2012) were analyzed and compared with the records of other admissions in the same period. In this cross-sectional study, the clinical and demographic characteristics of the restrained patients, the techniques used and the reported complications were described. Also, risk factors associated with the use of physical restraints were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. Results Physical restraint was used in 13.4% of admissions, was more common in young male patients, with a non-organic psychoses diagnosis, presenting agitation/aggressive behavior. Usually, a four-points restraint technique was performed, lasting between 61-240 minutes. The only significant risk factors for the use of restraints included age (OR = 0.98, p = 0.008) and length of stay (OR = 1.01, p < 0.001). Conclusions Physical restraint was used in the approach of the acutely agitated, aggressive, and non-responsive to verbal de-escalation patient, in the context of a psychotic disorder. The registration of vital signs and adverse effects were the items less frequently compliant to current protocols.