RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In contrast to the beginning of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), pandemic, more and more hospital issues are now regulated by policy. AIM: To identify differences between expert recommendations and legal requirements regarding infection prevention and control (IPC) strategies. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted between 29th September 2022 and 3rd November 2022 addressing 1319 members of the German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology. The response rate was 12%. This paper reports the expert recommendations on different IPC strategies. FINDINGS: The majority (66%) of experts recommended universal mask usage, with 34% recommending it seasonally, even after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Medical microbiology (MM) experts were more likely to recommend continuing to wear the masks indefinitely compared with IPC experts. Concerning the mask type, medical masks were recommended more frequently by IPC experts (47.3%), while FFP2 masks were preferred by MM experts (31.8%). The majority (54.7%) of experts recommended universal screening of employees, mainly in settings with extremely vulnerable patients and if regional incidence rates were high, at a frequency of twice per week. The dominant advice (recommended by at least 50% of experts) for employees exposed to SARS-CoV-2 was daily testing and wearing a mask, regardless of the length of exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Expert recommendations deviate from the legal requirements and appear to be more differentiated and proportional. The influence of specific experience and expertise on mask recommendations should be investigated in more detail. For relevant policy decisions, a quick, focused and broad-based consultation of expertise could be of added value.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Control de Infecciones , HigieneRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for healthcare workers (HCWs) started in Germany in December 2020. Hospitals had little time to prepare a vaccination strategy. AIM: To gather information on the initial vaccination strategy for HCWs from the infection control practitioners in Germany. METHODS: A cross-sectional, ethically approved questionnaire was developed, formatted as an online survey and pre-tested. Infection control practitioners responsible for hygiene/infection prevention in 987 randomly selected German hospitals were invited to participate in the survey in March and April 2021. For statistical analysis, the hospitals were categorized into two groups based on bed capacity (<500 beds: small; ≥500 beds: large). FINDINGS: One hundred out of 987 (10%) infection control practitioners completed the survey. In 80% of the participating hospitals, HCW vaccination prioritization was based on recommendations of the German standing committee on vaccination (STIKO). Even so, only 54% prioritized the vaccination of HCWs with contact to vulnerable patients, thus deviating from STIKO recommendations. HCWs with a high personal health risk were prioritized for vaccination in 24% of the hospitals. Transferring unvaccinated HCWs to an area with less infection risk was considered by 2% of large and 12% of small hospitals. CONCLUSION: Vaccination prioritization differed across hospitals and deviated from STIKO recommendations. A pandemic preparedness concept should address the potential impact of divergent strategies compared to a common approach. In addition, further studies analysing the reasons why HCWs remain unvaccinated are needed to adopt effective strategies. This is especially important against the background of facility-based compulsory vaccination.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Alemania/epidemiología , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Personal de Hospital , SARS-CoV-2 , VacunaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients are at risk of nosocomial COVID-19 infection. The role of accompanying persons/visitors as potential infection donors is not yet well researched, but the risk will be influenced by prevention measures recommended by infection control practitioners. AIM: To collect information about COVID-19 infection control strategies for patients and accompanying persons from infection control practitioners in German hospitals. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire was developed, ethically approved, pre-tested and formatted as an online tool. Infection control practitioners in 987 randomly selected German hospitals were invited to participate in March and April 2021. For statistical analysis, the hospitals were categorized as small (0-499 beds) or large (≥500 beds). FINDINGS: One hundred surveys were completed (response rate: 10%). A higher proportion of large (71%) than small (49%) hospitals let patients decide freely whether to wear medical or FFP2 masks. Most hospitals reported spatial separation for COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 cases (38%) or additionally for suspected COVID-19 cases (53%). A separation of healthcare teams for these areas existed in 54% of the hospitals. Accompaniment bans were more prevalent in large (52%) than in small hospitals (29%), but large hospitals granted more exemptions. CONCLUSION: The decision as to whether to separate areas and teams seemed to depend on the hospital's structural conditions, therefore impairing the implementation of recommendations. Accompaniment regulations differ between hospital sizes and may depend on patient numbers, case type/severity and patients' requirements. In the dynamic situation of a pandemic, it can be difficult to stay up to date with findings and recommendations on infection control.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Hospitales , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Pandemias/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Infections as a result of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) are considered infections with a high public health burden. In this study, we aimed to identify incidences of and risk factors for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) after rectal colonization with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) or Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-KP). METHODS: This prospective cohort study was performed in 2014 and 2015. Patients colonized with ESBL-EC or ESBL-KP were monitored for subsequent HAI with ESBL-E and other pathogens. In the case of an ESBL-E infection, rectal and clinical isolates were compared using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for ESBL-KP isolates. Proportional hazard models were applied to identify risk factors for HAIs, and to analyse competing risks. RESULTS: Among all patients admitted to the hospital during the study period, 13.6% were rectally screened for third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCREB). A total of 2386 rectal carriers of ESBL-EC and 585 of ESBL-KP were included in the study. Incidence density (ID) for HAI with ESBL-E was 2.74 per 1000 patient days at risk (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.16-3.43) among carriers of ESBL-EC, while it was 4.44 per 1000 patient days at risk (95% CI 3.17-6.04) among carriers of ESBL-KP. In contrast, ID for HAI with other pathogens was 4.36 per 1000 patient days at risk (95% CI 3.62-5.21) among carriers of ESBL-EC, and 5.00 per 1000 patient days at risk (95% CI 3.64-6.69) among carriers of ESBL-KP. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses identified colonization with ESBL-KP (HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.068-2.325) compared with ESBL-EC as independent risk factor for HAI with ESBL-E. The results were consistent over all competing risk analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware of the increased risk of ESBL-E infections among patients colonized with ESBL-KP compared with ESBL-EC that might be caused by underlying diseases, higher pathogenicity of ESBL-KP and other factors.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Klebsiella/epidemiología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , beta-Lactamasas/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Escherichia coli/genética , Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Femenino , Genoma Bacteriano , Humanos , Incidencia , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Klebsiella pneumoniae/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Recto/metabolismo , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismoRESUMEN
In a previous study, we demonstrated prolonged length of hospital stay in cases of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-positive K. pneumoniae bacteremia compared to bacteremia cases due to E. coli (ESBL-positive and -negative) and ESBL-negative K. pneumoniae. The overall mortality was significantly higher in bacteremia cases resulting from ESBL-positive pathogens but also in K. pneumoniae cases disregarding ESBL-production. In order to examine whether pathogen species rather than multidrug resistance might affect mortality risk, we reanalyzed our dataset that includes 1.851 cases of bacteremia.
RESUMEN
Surveillance systems for hospital infections are reporting increasing rates of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-positive Enterobacteriaceae in Europe. We aimed to perform a national survey on this trend and on the regional distribution of nosocomial infections due to ESBL-positive Enterobacteriaceae in German hospitals. Data from 2007 to 2012 from two components of the German national nosocomial infection surveillance system were used for this analysis. The data derive from intensive care units and surgical departments. Independent factors determining the proportion of ESBL-positive Enterobacteriaceae among nosocomial infections due to Enterobacteriaceae and changes in its regional distribution (broken down into German federal states) were calculated by regression analysis. From 2007 to 2012, the data showed a significantly increasing proportion of ESBL-positive Enterobacteriaceae in surgical site infections (from 11.46 to 15.38, 134%, p 0.003), urinary tract infections (9.36 to 16.56, 177%, p <0.001) and lower respiratory tract infections (11.91 to 14.70, 123%, p <0.001) due to Enterobacteriaceae. Factors independently associated with a growing proportion were: Thuringia (p 0.009; odds ratio (OR) 1.53), North Rhine-Westphalia (p <0.001; OR 1.41) and general surgery ward (p 0.002; OR 1.47). The proportion of ESBL-positive Enterobacteriaceae in nosocomial infections has significantly increased in Germany over the last 6 years. Hospitals in Central Germany and surgical departments in all of Germany are especially affected by this development.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimología , beta-Lactamasas/biosíntesis , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/diagnóstico , Geografía , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de la Población , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The burden of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-positive Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) is growing worldwide. We aimed to determine the financial disease burden attributable to ESBL-positive species in cases of bloodstream infection (BSI) due to K. pneumoniae and E. coli. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study on patients with BSI due to K. pneumoniae or E. coli between 2008 and 2011 in our institution. Data were collected on true hospital costs, length of stay (LOS), basic demographic parameters, underlying diseases as Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and ESBL positivity of the pathogens. Multivariable regression analysis on hospital costs and length of stay was performed. RESULTS: Overall we found 1,851 consecutive cases of ESBL-E BSI, 352 (19.0%) cases of K. pneumoniae BSI and 1,499 (81.0%) cases of E. coli BSI. Sixty-six of E. coli BSI (18.8%) and 178 of K. pneumoniae BSI (11.9%) cases were due to ESBL-positive isolates, respectively (p = 0.001). 830 (44.8%) cases were hospital-onset, 215 (61.1%) of the K. pneumoniae and 615 (41.0%) of the E. coli cases (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was overall 19.8, 25.0% in K. pneumoniae cases and 18.5% in E. coli cases (p = 0.006). Increased hospital costs and length of stay were significantly associated to BSI with ESBL-positive K. pneumoniae. CONCLUSION: In contrast to BSI due to ESBL-positive E. coli, cases of ESBL-positive K. pneumoniae BSI were associated with significantly increased costs and length of stay. Infection prevention measures should differentiate between both pathogens.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/microbiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Escherichia coli/enzimología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzimología , beta-Lactamasas/biosíntesis , Anciano , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacteriemia/economía , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Costo de Enfermedad , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/economía , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/economía , Infecciones por Klebsiella/epidemiología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resistencia betalactámicaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CVC BSI) are a common and serious complication among critically ill patients on intensive care units (ICUs), but also result in a financial burden for the health care system. Our aim was to determine the additional costs and length of stay (LOS) of patients with ICU-acquired CVC BSI. METHODS: We used the surveillance method of the German nosocomial infection surveillance system (Krankenhaus Infections Surveillance System, KISS) to find cases of CVC BSI. The associated costs of CVC BSI were estimated as true costs generated within our hospital. We used a matched cohort design, comparing patients with CVC BSI and patients without BSI. The study period was from January to December 2010. Patients were matched by age, sex, and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS). The LOS in the ICU of control patients needed to be at least as long as that of CVC BSI patients before the onset of CVC BSI. RESULTS: We matched 40 CVC BSI patients to 40 patients without BSI. The median hospital costs for CVC BSI patients were significantly higher than for patients without BSI (60,445 vs. 35,730 ; p = 0.006) and the CVC BSI patients stayed longer in the hospital than patients without CVC BSI (44 days vs. 30 days; p = 0.110). The median attributable costs per CVC BSI was 29,909 (p = 0.006) and the median attributable LOS was 7 days (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: CVC BSI is associated with increased hospital costs and prolonged hospital stay. Hospital management should implement control measurements to keep the incidence of CVC BSI as low as possible.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/economía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Little information is available on antibiotic prescription management in German hospitals. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to determine the prevalence and components of antibiotic stewardship measures in German intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: A questionnaire survey was sent to all ICUs participating in the German nosocomial infection surveillance system (n = 579) in October 2011. Data on antibiotic management structures were collected and analyzed by structural hospital and ICU factors. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 355 German ICUs (response rate 61 %). Common measures used (>80 % of the ICUs) were personnel restrictions for antibiotic prescriptions, routine access to bacterial resistance data, and pharmacy reports on antibiotic costs and consumption. A small proportion of ICUs (14 %) employed physicians specialized in the prescription of antimicrobial medication. Hospitals with their own microbiological laboratory report participation in surveillance networks for antimicrobial use (34 %) and bacterial resistance (32 %) twice as often as hospitals with external laboratories (15 and 14 %, respectively, p < 0.001). Also, non-profit and public hospitals participate more often in surveillance networks for bacterial resistance than private hospitals (>23 % vs. 11 %, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of ICUs report to have some antibiotic policies established, the contents and composition of these policies vary. Organizational-level control strategies to improve antibiotic management are common in Germany. However, strategies widely considered effective, such as the systematic cross-institutional surveillance of antimicrobial use and bacterial resistance in a standardized manner or the employment of infectious disease specialists, are scarce. This study provides a benchmark for future antibiotic stewardship programs.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/normas , Utilización de Medicamentos/normas , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios Transversales , Alemania , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infants with very low birthweight (< 1 500 g, VLBW) are at increased risk for nosocomial infections (NI). In 2 000, we implemented a surveillance system for VLBW infants in Germany: NEO-KISS. In 2005, a joint committee of healthcare providers and insurance companies required German neonatology departments to participate. As a result, NEO-KISS is now a nationwide surveillance system for NI in VLBW infants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present NEO-KISS data collected between 2007 and 2011 by 228 neonatology departments. Rates of sepsis, pneumonia and necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) were calculated. In order to evaluate the department-specific infection rate we introduced a new indicator: the Standardised Infection Rate (SIR). The SIR considers the department-specific patient distribution (based on the patients' birthweight) and describes the ratio of observed and expected infections (calculated from the reference data for this individual patient distribution). The data presented comprise 33 048 VLBW infants.The incidence density of CVC-associated sepsis 8.6 per 1 000 CVC-days. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The incidence of pneumonia among mechanically ventilated patients was 2.7/1 000 ventilator days. The incidence of NEC was 0.8. The SIR showed strong variation among the participating departments. It is an excellent tool for identifying outliers in nosocomial infection rates and for stimulating activities to decrease the risk of nosocomial infections.