RESUMEN
The objective was to study prescription practices of primary care physicians in prescribing antibiotics for community-acquired respiratory tract infections. Design was time series analysis and cross-sectional survey. The setting was 30 community primary health care centres. A case report form was completed for 3478 patient consultations treated by 198 office-based primary care physicians. Main outcome measures were: classification of diagnoses of respiratory tract infections made by each physician; number of antibiotic prescriptions related to these diagnoses; each physician's mean weekly number of antibiotic prescriptions during 6 months before and after the survey. Patients' risk (odds ratio: OR) to receive an antibiotic prescription from the high and medium prescribers was 5.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.85-6.96) and 2.41 (95% CI 2.04-2.86), compared to low prescribers. High and medium prescribers made more diagnoses of otitis media (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.70-2.53 and 1.85, 95% CI 1.51-2.26, respectively) and fewer diagnoses of unspecified upper respiratory tract infection (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.26-0.38 and 0.57, 95% CI 0.48-0.68, respectively) than low prescribers. The rank of the prescription rate of high, medium and low prescriber groups remained the same for all diagnoses except pneumonia. In addition, the annual rank between high, medium and low prescriber groups remained stable; high group prescribed more antibiotics during the year than medium group, which prescribed more than low prescriber group.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/diagnóstico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Utilización de Medicamentos , Humanos , Oportunidad RelativaRESUMEN
The concentration of total mercury in stimulated saliva was studied in humans with dental amalgam fillings and in 2 nonamalgam groups. The probability of exceeding the limits of mercury permitted in wastewater increased proportionally as the number of amalgam-filled surfaces increased. The mercury limit for sewage is 0.05 mg/l (= 250 nmol/l) effluent, according to the Council of European Communities directive 84/156/EEC. In neither of the nonamalgam groups was this limit exceeded, but 20.5% in the amalgam group exceeded the limit (p < .001). The risk of exceeding the limit increased 2-fold for every 10 additional amalgam-filled surfaces (odds ratio = 2.0; 95% confidence interval = 1.3, 3.3). These results demonstrate that humans, especially in populated areas, can be a significant source of mercury pollutants. As a consequence of mercury release, bacteria may acquire mercury resistance, as well as resistance to other antimicrobial agents, thus resulting in failure of antibiotic treatment.