RESUMEN
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is internationally established as an approved treatment option for in situ forms of keratinocytic skin cancer (actinic keratoses, Bowen's disease, basal cell carcinoma). For these indications, there are standardized treatment protocols using narrow-spectrum light sources or (artificial) daylight, the use of which is associated with successful healing, a low rate of lesion recurrence, and a very good cosmetic result. Daylight PDT is superior to conventional PDT in terms of significantly less pain and associated higher patient acceptance. Newer indications, for which no approval has yet been granted, but which nevertheless have sufficient evidence of efficacy according to the study situation, are inflammatory (lichen sclerosus, acne) and infectious dermatoses (viral warts, cutaneous leishmaniasis, atypical mycobacteriosis). In addition, PDT is increasingly being used in aesthetic dermatology with the aim of skin rejuvenation.
RESUMEN
This updated and upgraded S2k guideline deals with the diagnosis and treatment of rosacea, which is a common, chronic inflammatory skin disease mostly affecting the face. Initially, rosacea is characterized by recurrent erythema, telangiectasia and flushing. Later, the inflammatory component predominates, with persistent erythema with follicular papules, papulopustules and pustules. The development of phyma, which usually occurs on the acral localizations, is the most severe manifestation. For the treatment of rosacea, the interdisciplinary guideline committee, with representatives of the German Dermatological Society (DDG), the Professional Association of German Dermatologists (BVDD), the German Opthalmological Society (DOG), the Society for Dermopharmacy (GD), the Swiss Society for Dermatology and Venereology (SGDV) and the German Rosacea Aid e. V., recommends the avoidance of trigger factors and topical applications of metronidazole, azelaic acid or ivermectin. For symptomatic treatment of persistent centrofacial erythema, the topical vasoconstrictors brimonidine or oxymetazoline can also be used. Systemic therapy is recommended for therapy-resistant and severe forms of rosacea papulopustulosa. The drug of choice is low-dose doxycycline. Alternatively, low-dose isotretinoin can be recommended. Ocular rosacea should be treated with lid margin hygiene. For topical treatment, ciclosporin eye drops, azithromycin, ivermectin or metronidazole are suggested.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Dermatológicos , Rosácea , Tartrato de Brimonidina , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Eritema/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Ivermectina/uso terapéutico , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Rosácea/diagnóstico , Rosácea/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Cutaneous leishmaniasis is one of the most common travel dermatoses in Germany, which can be acquired not only in Africa, Asia or the American continent, but also in southern European countries. In addition to the currently available topical and systemic therapy options, there have been increasing reports of successful treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with photodynamic therapy (PDT) using numerous therapy regimens and different photosensitizers in recent years. We report on successful photodynamic therapy of Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis with red and green light PDT with 10% 5aminolevulinic acid.
Asunto(s)
Leishmaniasis Cutánea , Fotoquimioterapia , Humanos , Ácido Aminolevulínico/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Fotosensibilizantes/uso terapéutico , Leishmaniasis Cutánea/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Computerized clinical image analysis is shown to improve diagnostic accuracy for cutaneous melanoma but its effectiveness in preoperative assessment of melanoma thickness has not been studied. The aim of this study, is to explore how melanoma thickness correlates with computer-assisted objectively obtained color and geometric variables. All patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma with available clinical images prior to tumor excision were included in the study. All images underwent digital processing with an automated non-commercial software. The software provided measurements for geometrical variables, i.e., overall lesion surface, maximum diameter, perimeter, circularity, eccentricity, mean radius, as well as for color variables, i.e., range, standard deviation, coefficient of variation and skewness in the red, green, and blue color space. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-six lesions were included in the final analysis. The mean tumor thickness was 1.84 mm (range 0.2-25). Melanoma thickness was strongly correlated with overall surface area, maximum diameter, perimeter and mean lesion radius. Thickness was moderately correlated with eccentricity, green color and blue color. We conclude that geometrical and color parameters, as objectively extracted by computer-aided clinical image processing, may correlate with tumor thickness in patients with cutaneous melanoma. However, these correlations are not strong enough to reliably predict tumor thickness.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Melanoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico por imagen , Programas InformáticosRESUMEN
Scabies is a contagious disease with increasing frequency. This is confirmed by data from insurance companies as well as increased search queries on Google. There is a controversial discussion in the scientific literature whether the mite has become resistant to standard therapy with permethrin. One case report and a group of cases (Nâ¯= 12) from a mother-child facility are described in the following demonstrating decreased effectiveness of permethrin therapy. Dermatoscopy can be helpful in diagnosis and in assessing effectiveness of therapy. Dermatoscopic criteria are shown and therapeutic concepts are critically discussed.
Asunto(s)
Insecticidas , Escabiosis , Administración Oral , Administración Tópica , Niño , Humanos , Insecticidas/uso terapéutico , Ivermectina/uso terapéutico , Permetrina/uso terapéutico , Escabiosis/diagnóstico , Escabiosis/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Uveal melanoma (UM) is an orphan cancer of high unmet medical need. Current patterns of care and surveillance remain unclear as they are situated in an interdisciplinary setting. METHODS: A questionnaire addressing the patterns of care and surveillance in the management of patients with uveal melanoma was distributed to 70 skin cancer centers in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Frequency distributions of responses for each item of the questionnaire were calculated. RESULTS: 44 of 70 (62.9%) skin cancer centers completed the questionnaire. Thirty-nine hospitals were located in Germany (88.6%), three in Switzerland (6.8%) and two in Austria (4.5%). The majority (68.2%) represented university hospitals. Most patients with metastatic disease were treated in certified skin cancer centers (70.7%, 29/41). Besides, the majority of patients with UM were referred to the respective skin cancer center by ophthalmologists (87.2%, 34/39). Treatment and organization of follow-up of patients varied across the different centers. 35.1% (14/37) of the centers stated to not perform any screening measures. CONCLUSION: Treatment patterns of patients with uveal melanoma in Germany, Austria and Switzerland remain extremely heterogeneous. A guideline for the treatment and surveillance is urgently needed.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores , Melanoma/terapia , Monitoreo Fisiológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Úvea/terapia , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Cuidados Posteriores/estadística & datos numéricos , Austria/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania/epidemiología , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Melanoma/epidemiología , Melanoma/patología , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/estadística & datos numéricos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Derivación y Consulta/normas , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suiza/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Úvea/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Úvea/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Solar urticaria is a rare photodermatosis, the diagnosis and therapy of which have not yet been standardized. The aim of this research was to use innovative radiation sources for diagnostics with defined and reproducible emission spectra and doses. A uniform therapy step scheme was to be created. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a longitudinal study, 27 patients with solar urticaria were examined over 13 years. With a characteristic anamnesis, the diagnosis was confirmed with phototesting (photoprovocation) from various radiation sources (UVB, UVB311nm, UVA, UVA-1, green light, red light) and a therapy step scheme was designed consisting of light protection, antihistamines, rush hardening with UVA-1, and administration of omalizumab. RESULTS: Action spectrum: UVB 44 %, UVA 70 %, UVA-1 89 %, green light 37 % and red light 22 %. Rush hardening with subsequent maintenance therapy was performed on 20 patients, 17 of whom were hereby adequately protected. In three further patients, omalizumab was additionally administered. CONCLUSIONS: Phototesting with UVB, UVB311nm, UVA, UVA-1, and visible light with innovative radiation sources is uniformly possible in every major skin clinic. With the help of the therapy step scheme the patients can be adjusted well. Rush hardening with UVA-1 is a safe method to help the patients during the sunny season. Omalizumab as the last therapy option is effective, but currently only possible in off-label use.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos por Fotosensibilidad , Urticaria , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Omalizumab , Luz Solar , Rayos UltravioletaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Solar urticaria is a rare photodermatosis, yet lacking standardization in diagnosis and therapy. The aim of this research was to use innovative radiation sources for diagnostics with defines and reproducible emission spectrum and doses. A uniform therapy step scheme was to be created. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a longitudinal study, 27 patients were examined with solar urticaria over 13 years. With a characteristic anamnesis, the diagnosis was confirmed with phototesting from various radiation sources (UVB, UVB311nm, UVA, UVA1, green light, red light) and a therapy step scheme consisting of light protection, antihistamines, rush hardening with UVA-1 and the treatment with omalizumab. RESULTS: Action spectrum: UVB 44 %, UVA 70 %, UVA1 89 %, green light 37 % and red light 22 %. Rush hardening was performed on 20 patients, 17 of whom were adequately protected. In three further patients, omalizumab was additionally treated in off-label use. CONCLUSIONS: Photoprovocation with UVB, UVB311nm, UVA, UVA-1 and visible light with innovative radiation sources is uniformly possible in every major skin clinic. With the help of the therapy step scheme the patients can be adjusted well, a Rush Hardening with UVA-1 is a safe method to help the patients during the sunny season. Omalizumab as the last therapy option is effective, but currently only possible in off-label use.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: We have previously reported on the 3-year results of the phase III German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group trial (DeCOG; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02434107) comparing distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with positive sentinel lymph-node biopsy who were randomly assigned to complete lymph node dissection (CLND) or observation. Here, we report the final analysis with 72 months of median follow up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The multicenter randomized phase III trial included patients with cutaneous melanoma of the trunk and extremities who were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo CLND or observation. DMFS was analyzed as the primary end point, and RFS, OS, and recurrences in the regional lymph node basin were secondary end points. The analysis was by intention to treat. Disease and survival information were collected quarterly. RESULTS: From January 2006 to December 2014, 5,547 patients were screened to identify 1,256 with metastases in the sentinel lymph node (SLN). Of these, 483 (39%) were included: 241 in the observation arm and 242 in the CLND arm. In the final analysis, median follow up was 72 months (interquartile range, 67-77 months). No significant treatment-related difference was seen in the 5-year DMFS between the observation and CLND arms (67.6% v 64.9%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; P = .87). The 5-year RFS and OS also showed no difference (HR, 1.01 and 0.99, respectively). Grade 3 and 4 adverse effects occurred in 32 patients (13%) in the CLND arm; lymphedema (n = 20) and delayed wound healing (n = 5) were most common and no serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: The final results of the German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group trial with a median follow up of 72 months showed higher event rates, but similar HRs compared with those at the 3-year analysis. These results confirm that immediate CLND in SLN-positive patients is not superior to observation in terms of DMFS, RFS, or OS and support not recommending CLND in patients with SLN metastasis.