RESUMEN
: There is an unacceptably high burden of death and disability from conditions that are treatable by surgery, worldwide and especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The major actions to improve this situation need to be taken by the surgical communities, institutions, and governments of the LMICs. The US surgical community, including the US academic surgical community, has, however, important roles to play in addressing this problem. The American Surgical Association convened a Working Group to address how US academic surgery can most effectively decrease the burden from surgically treatable conditions in LMICs. The Working Group believes that the task will be most successful (1) if the epidemiologic pattern in a given country is taken into account by focusing on those surgically treatable conditions with the highest burdens; (2) if emphasis is placed on those surgical services that are most cost-effective and most feasible to scale up; and (3) if efforts are harmonized with local priorities and with existing global initiatives, such as the World Health Assembly with its 2015 resolution on essential surgery. This consensus statement gives recommendations on how to achieve those goals through the tools of academic surgery: clinical care, training and capacity building, research, and advocacy. Through all of these, the ethical principles of maximally and transparently engaging with and deferring to the interests and needs of local surgeons and their patients are of paramount importance. Notable benefits accrue to US surgeons, trainees, and institutions that engage in global surgical activities.
Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Salud Global , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Rol del Médico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Consenso , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Childhood obesity is a tremendous burden for children, their families, and society. Obesity prevention remains the ultimate goal but rapid development and deployment of effective nonsurgical treatment options is not currently achievable given the complexity of this disease. Surgical options for adolescent obesity have been proven to be safe and effective and should be offered. The development of stratified protocols of increasing intensity should be individualized for patients based on their disease severity and risk factors. These protocols should be offered in multidisciplinary, cooperative clinical trials to critically evaluate and develop optimal treatment strategies for morbid obesity.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Obesidad/cirugía , Adolescente , Fármacos Antiobesidad/uso terapéutico , Cirugía Bariátrica/instrumentación , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Niño , Protocolos Clínicos , Terapia Combinada , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/etiología , Obesidad/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Programas de Reducción de PesoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The public health crisis of obesity has spread to the pediatric population. In morbidly obese (MO) adolescents, early weight loss intervention can reduce and prevent obesity-related comorbidities and mortality and improve quality of life. The present study was performed to evaluate weight loss efficacy and safety of "off-label" laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) procedures performed in MO adolescents by our adult bariatric program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 716 LAGB procedures performed on an off-label basis in adults and 24 adolescent patients ages 14 to 20 years by the adult bariatric program at our institution between 2001 and 2006. RESULTS: There was no mortality. Average operative time was 45 minutes, length of stay for adolescents was 15 hours, and weight loss outcome and overall surgical complication rates are comparable between adolescents and adults. For adolescent subjects, baseline mean preoperative body mass index was 49 kg/m and average excess weight loss rates were 22%, 34%, 52%, 42%, and 42% at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. The overall complication rate was 29%, with a 25% incidence of pouch enlargement in adolescents (vs 18% in adult patients; P = ns). Two of 24 adolescent patients (8.4%) required laparoscopic band repositioning (vs 1.5% of adult patients; P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: LAGB is an effective and safe surgical weight loss modality for MO adolescent subjects. Vigilant follow-up for LAGB-related complications and intensive postoperative behavioral management are important for improving long-term success. We recommend continued investigation of long-term efficacy and safety of LAGB in this population.