RESUMEN
Inactivated and fowlpox virus (FP)-vectored vaccines have been used to control H5 avian influenza (AI) in poultry. In H5 AI endemic countries, breeder flocks are vaccinated and therefore, maternally-derived antibodies (MDA) are transferred to their progeny. Results of three immunogenicity and one efficacy studies performed in birds with or without MDA indicated that the immunogenicity of an inactivated vaccine based on a H5N9 AI isolate (inH5N9) was severely impaired in chicks hatched from inH5N9-vaccinated breeders. This MDA interference was lower when breeders received only one administration of the same vaccine and could be overcome by priming the chicks at day-of-age with a live recombinant FP-vectored vaccine with H5 avian influenza gene insert (FP-AI). The interference of anti-FP MDA was of lower intensity than the interference of anti-AI MDA. The highest interference observed on the prime-boost immunogenicity was in chicks hatched from breeders vaccinated with the same prime-boost scheme. The level of protection against an antigenic variant H5N1 highly pathogenic AI isolate from Indonesia against which the FP-AI or inH5N9 alone was poorly protective could be circumvented by the prime-boost regimen in birds with either FP or AI MDA. Thus, the immunogenicity of vaccines in young chicks with MDA depends on the vaccination scheme and the type of vaccine used in their parent flocks. The heterologous prime-boost in birds with MDA may at least partially overcome MDA interference on inactivated vaccine.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/biosíntesis , Pollos , Subtipo H5N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Gripe Aviar/prevención & control , Animales , Viruela Aviar/inmunología , Virus de la Viruela de las Aves de Corral/inmunología , Gripe Aviar/inmunología , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunologíaRESUMEN
Mixtures of turkey herpesvirus (HVT) and Rispens poultry vaccines have been used worldwide for over 20 yr, mainly for vaccination of future layers and breeders. With increasing virulence of Marek's disease (MD) virus strains, vaccination strategies are evolving toward the use of vaccines combining HVT and Rispens. A single vaccination either in ovo or at 1 day of age with the HVT + infectious bursal disease (IBD) vector vaccine is efficient against IBD. However, with vaccination programs that include a hatchery administration of the HVT + IBD vaccine, additional protection against very virulent and very virulent-plus MD viruses is needed, especially for layers and breeders. This study looked at the combination of four commercially available Rispens vaccines with the HVT + IBD vector vaccine injected at 1 day of age. MD challenge tests that were superior to 90% in relative score in all the groups vaccinated with both vaccines showed that the mixture of HVT + IBD and Rispens vaccines had no effect on clinical protection against MD, and IBD challenge tests showed that the mixture of HVT + IBD and Rispens vaccines had no effect on clinical protection against IBD, which was equal to 100% protection in all the groups vaccinated with both vaccines.
Asunto(s)
Pollos , Herpesvirus Meleágrido 1/inmunología , Virus de la Enfermedad Infecciosa de la Bolsa/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Enfermedad de Marek/inmunología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/prevención & control , Animales , Infecciones por Birnaviridae/prevención & control , Infecciones por Birnaviridae/veterinaria , Femenino , Enfermedad de Marek/prevención & control , Organismos Libres de Patógenos EspecíficosRESUMEN
Fowlpox (FP)-vectored avian influenza (FP-AI) vaccines are used in 1-day-old chickens, but they have also recently been shown to be immunogenic in ducks. The objectives of this work were 1) to evaluate safety and to compare the immunogenicity in ducks of three poxvirus vectors (fowlpox, canarypox, and vaccinia) expressing the same hemagglutinin gene from an H5N1 isolate, 2) to study the effect of the dose of the FP-AI and the presence of an adjuvant in 1-day-old Pekin ducks on antibody response after a boost with inactivated vaccine given 3 wk later, and 3) to confirm the immunogenicity of such a heterologous prime-boost vaccination scheme in 1-day-old Muscovy ducks. Immunogenicity induced by the three poxvirus vectors was comparable, and the FP vector was selected for the other studies. As published previously, there was a strong dose effect of the FP-AI priming on the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers induced after the boost with an inactivated vaccine. In contrast, the two tested adjuvants did not significantly increase the activity of FP-AI priming. The heterologous prime-boost regimen given to both Muscovy and Pekin ducklings at 1 and 14 or 21 days of age, respectively, was shown to be at least as immunogenic as two administrations of inactivated vaccines given at 2 and 5 wk of age. However, HI antibody titers were of short duration for both vaccine schemes, and their persistence was heterogeneous among individual birds.
Asunto(s)
Avipoxvirus , Patos/genética , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Gripe Aviar/prevención & control , Animales , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Subtipo H5N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Factores de Tiempo , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunología , Vacunas Sintéticas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Sintéticas/inmunologíaRESUMEN
The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of two avian influenza (AI) H5-inactivated vaccines containing either an American (A/turkey/Wisconsin/68 H5N9; H5N9-WI) or a Eurasian isolate (A/chicken/Italy/22A/98 H5N9; H5N9-It). Three-week-old specific pathogen-free chickens were vaccinated once and challenged 3 wk later with a H5N1 highly pathogenic AI (HPAI) virus isolated from a chicken in Thailand in 2004. All unvaccinated challenged birds died within 2 days, whereas 90% and 100% of chickens vaccinated with H5N9-WI and H5N9-It, respectively, were protected against morbidity and mortality. Both vaccines prevented cloacal shedding and significantly reduced oral shedding of the challenge HPAI virus. Additional chickens (vaccinated or unvaccinated) were placed in contact with the directly challenged birds 18 hr after challenge. All unvaccinated chickens in contact with unvaccinated challenged birds died within 3 days after contact, whereas unvaccinated chickens in contact with vaccinated challenged birds either showed a significantly delayed mortality or did not become infected. All vaccinated contacts were protected against clinical signs, and most chickens did not shed detectable amount of HPAI virus. Altogether, these data indicate that both vaccines protected very well against morbidity and mortality and reduced or prevented shedding induced by direct or contact exposure to Asian H5N1 HPAI virus.