RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to compare levels of anxiety sensitivity (AS) across a treatment-seeking sample of individuals primarily using opioids, stimulants, or cannabis. Consistent with the idea that individuals high in AS may be motivated to use substances with real or perceived anxiolytic properties, it was hypothesized that individuals primarily using opioids or cannabis would evidence higher levels of AS compared to individuals primarily using stimulants. METHODS: The sample consisted of 110 veterans (including 29 individuals primarily using opioids, 42 primarily using cannabis, and 39 primarily using stimulants) presenting for psychological services to a Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Substance Use Disorder (SUD) specialty clinic at a large southeastern Veteran Affairs (VA) hospital. RESULTS: AS levels varied by group with individuals primarily using stimulants evidencing the highest levels followed by those primarily using opioids and then those primarily using cannabis. Individuals primarily using stimulants had statistically significantly higher levels of AS physical concerns compared to individuals primarily using cannabis but not those primarily using opioids. Further, individuals who primarily use opioids did not differ from those primarily using cannabis. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these findings call into question the notion that AS may be negatively related to the use of substances that have anxiogenic properties.
Asunto(s)
Cannabis , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Analgésicos Opioides , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad , Humanos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Veterans are particularly vulnerable to experiencing concurrent issues related to depression and alcohol misuse. Despite this well-established susceptibility, research explicating targetable mechanisms that can account for this comorbidity remains limited. The present study sought to examine the explanatory role of ruminative thought processing within the depression and alcohol misuse relationship. METHOD: The sample included 230 veterans presenting to a general mental health clinic at a large Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital (83% male, 58% African American, Mageâ¯=â¯50.61, SDageâ¯=â¯13.79). As part of their intake evaluation, veterans completed a brief battery of self-report questionnaires to assist with diagnostic clarification and treatment planning. RESULTS: A significant total effect was observed between depression and alcohol misuse. An indirect effect between depression and alcohol misuse via rumination was also found. Notably, when examining two subtypes of rumination, an indirect effect between depression and alcohol misuse via reflective pondering but not brooding was evinced. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that ruminative thought processing may be an explanatory risk factor within the depression and alcohol misuse relationship. By testing the simultaneous indirect effects of brooding rumination and reflective pondering, the present study also offers novel insights concerning the circumstances under which reflection may become a maladaptive process.
Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo , Veteranos , Adolescente , Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Autoinforme , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
The opioid epidemic is having a disproportionate impact on veterans. Indeed, veterans are twice as likely to die from an accidental overdose than members of the general population, even after accounting for gender and age distribution. Although many veterans seek treatment, a large proportion drop out prematurely and/or relapse highlighting the need to identify malleable factors that may contribute to the recovery process. One such variable is anxiety sensitivity (AS; i.e., fear of anxious arousal). AS is elevated in opioid use populations and is a predictor of treatment dropout among opioid users. Importantly, research suggests that AS is highly malleable; although, no studies have systematically examined such protocols among opioid users. To this end, the purpose of the proposed study was to test the acceptability, feasibility, and utility of a brief, one-session Computerized Anxiety Sensitivity Treatment (termed CAST) delivered to veterans seeking services for an opioid use disorder (OUD). Veterans (n = 16) were assessed at baseline and also at one-week and one-month following CAST. All veterans completed the protocol and reported being interested and engaged during the intervention. Further, small to medium reductions in psychopathology and substance use outcomes were found. Although more work is needed, the current study provides preliminary support for the effectiveness of a brief AS-focused intervention among veterans seeking treatment for an OUD.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/terapia , Intervención basada en la Internet , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Veteranos/psicología , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento , Proyectos PilotoRESUMEN
Introduction It is estimated that 70% of patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have chronic insomnia. A recent meta-analysis examined cognitive-behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) in veterans with and without PTSD, and suggested that most studies had questionable methodology, but generally supported its effectiveness in this population. Further, while CBT-I via telehealth (i.e. using telecommunication and information technology to deliver health services) has shown effectiveness for primary insomnia, it has not been applied to PTSD-related insomnia. Methods Veterans with insomnia who were diagnosed with PTSD ( n = 12) or having significant subthreshold PTSD symptoms ( n = 6) on the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale were randomly assigned to receive CBT-I in-person ( n = 7) or by telephone ( n = 11), to pilot test the potential effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of administering CBT-I in rural veterans. A six-week CBT-I protocol was delivered, and the veteran's insomnia was assessed at post-treatment and follow-up. Results Given the small sample size, Cohen's d was used to detect group differences, finding large effect sizes favouring the in-person delivery, until three-months post-treatment when this difference diminished. Most veterans found the treatment acceptable, regardless of mode of delivery. Based on the results, a larger project is feasible. Feasibility for a larger project is favourable. Discussion In summary, our findings uphold and extend previous research. Specifically, current pilot data suggest that telephone-delivered CBT-I may be able to reduce trauma-related insomnia symptoms. Future trials are needed to assess the effectiveness of CBT-I delivered to rural veterans with posttraumatic insomnia.