RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rivastigmine is a cholinesterase inhibitor for treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia associated with Parkinson's disease. The new patch formulation was recently made available. We assessed the safety, tolerability, and cognitive outcome of rivastigmine patch in treatment of mild to moderate AD in clinical practice in Thailand. METHODS: A multicentre, hospital-based, prospective observational study was conducted in nine hospitals across Thailand. Patients with probable mild to moderate AD who received the rivastigmine patch were enrolled. Data were collected data at baseline, weeks 4-8 and after week16. RESULTS: A total of 116 AD patients were screened, and three were excluded. Of 113 patients, 62.8% were women with a mean age of 73.3 ± 9.2 years; 79.7% were newly diagnosed. One-third of all patients had been using antipsychotic or antidepressant medication. Common comorbidities were hypertension and dyslipidemia. The Thai Mental State Examination score significantly increased from 18.6 to 20.3 (weeks 4-8) and 20.4 (week 16+) (P < 0.001). Scores based on physicians' (Clinical Global Impression) and caregivers' (Patients' Caregiver Global Impression of Change) impressions of improvement suggested minimal improvement. Because of adverse events, seven patients's dosages were reduced 10 cm(2) to 5 cm(2) or from 5 cm(2) to nothing. Itching was the most common adverse symptom. CONCLUSIONS: During the first 16 weeks after initiation of rivastigmine patch therapy, patients with probable mild to moderate AD had statistically significant improvement in cognitive function, but clinically marginal benefit. Rivastigmine was safe and well tolerated.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Colinesterasa/administración & dosificación , Cognición/efectos de los fármacos , Fenilcarbamatos/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/psicología , Inhibidores de la Colinesterasa/efectos adversos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fenilcarbamatos/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Rivastigmina , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tailandia , Parche Transdérmico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Prognosis of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) has never been studied in Thailand. A simple prognostic score to predict poor prognosis of CVST has also never been reported. The authors are aiming to establish a simple and reliable prognostic score for this condition. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The medical records of CVST patients from eight neurological training centers in Thailand who received between April 1993 and September 2005 were reviewed as part of this retrospective study. Clinical features included headache, seizure, stroke risk factors, Glasgow coma scale (GCS), blood pressure on arrival, papilledema, hemiparesis, meningeal irritation sign, location of occluded venous sinuses, hemorrhagic infarction, cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure, treatment options, length of stay, and other complications were analyzed to determine the outcome using modified Rankin scale (mRS). Poor prognosis (defined as mRS of 3-6) was determined on the discharge date. RESULTS: One hundred ninety four patients' records, 127 females (65.5%) and mean age of 36.6 +/- 14.4 years, were analyzed Fifty-one patients (26.3%) were in the poor outcome group (mRS 3-6). Overall mortality was 8.4%. Univariate analysis and then multivariate analysis using SPSS version 11.5 revealed only four statistically significant predictors influencing outcome of CVST They were underlying malignancy, low GCS, presence of hemorrhagic infarction (for poor outcome), and involvement of lateral sinus (for good outcome). Thai venous stroke prognostic score (TV-SPSS) was derived from these four factors using a multiple logistic model. CONCLUSION: A simple and pragmatic prognostic score for CVST outcome has been developed with high sensitivity (93%), yet low specificity (33%). The next study should focus on the validation of this score in other prospective populations.
Asunto(s)
Venas Cerebrales/fisiopatología , Trombosis de los Senos Intracraneales/fisiopatología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Trombosis de los Senos Intracraneales/diagnóstico , Trombosis de los Senos Intracraneales/terapia , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Tailandia , Resultado del Tratamiento , VenasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Piribedil is a non-ergot D2/D3 dopamine agonist with antagonistic effect on alpha2-adrenoceptors and lack of agonist properties at 5-HT2A/2C receptors. Previous studies indicated its efficacy in monotherapy as well as in combinatio' s disease in L-dopa-treated parkinsonian patients. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A 6-month, open-labeled, multicenter study was conducted in Thai Parkinsonian patients who were insufficiently controlled by L-dopa (< or = 600 mg/day). Piribedil 50 mg in retard form was titrated upward to 150 mg/day (50 mg tid) by the 5th week and up to 6 months as an add-on treatment. L-dopa daily dose was kept stable until the 3rd month and could be adjusted afterwards. The main efficacy parameter was the change in UPDRS part III score versus baseline over Full Analysis Set, score variation, and percentage of responders defined by at least 30% decrease from baseline of total UPDRS part III score. The secondary efficacy criteria were changes in L-dopa dose between the third month and the end of the study, UPDRS part II score variation, Hoehn and Yahr stage variation and Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale variation. The acceptability of piribedil was assessed by physical examination, weight, blood pressure and heart rate as well as the reported adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (55.2% male) with the mean age of 64.0 +/- 7.2 years and mean duration of disease of 18.3 +/- 8.2 months were recruited The mean UPDRS part III score at baseline was 19.8 +/- 11.4. After 6-month treatment with piribedil, mean UPDRS part III score significantly decreased to 6.6 +/- 4.7 (p < 0.0001) with mean score variation of 13.3 +/- 10.3. Twenty-seven patients (93.1%) were responders. Mean UPDRS part II score was significantly decreased from 7.2 +/- 5.4 at baseline to 2.7 +/- 2.1 at the end of 6 months (p < 0.0001). Hoehn and Yahr stage and Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale were also significantly improved Reported adverse events were mainly gastrointestinal symptoms. Blood pressure and heart rate were not significantly changed during the study period. Peak dose dyskinesia was reported only in one patient. Two patients (6.9%) were withdrawn because of adverse events. CONCLUSION: Piribedil was effective on motor symptoms during a 6-month treatment in early parkinsonian patients insufficiently controlled by L-dopa and it was well tolerated.