Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
J Med Libr Assoc ; 111(3): 677-683, 2023 Jul 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37483368

RESUMEN

Objective: This study aimed to measure the association between the efficacy/efficiency of digital information retrieval among community family physicians at the point of care and information and computer literacy. Methods: This study is a part of a cross-sectional anonymous online survey-based study among community family physicians who reported no affiliation with an academic institution in eight Arab countries. Results: A total of 72 physicians were included. The mean total score for the information literacy scale was 59.8 out of 91 (SD = 11.4). The mean score was 29.3 (SD = 5.6) out of 55 on the computer literacy scale. A one-way ANOVA revealed a statistically significant association between information literacy and information retrieval efficacy (F (2,69) = 4.466, p = 0.015) and efficiency of information retrieval (F (2.69) = 4.563, p = 0.014). Computer literacy was not associated with information retrieval efficacy or efficiency. Conclusion: The information and computer literacy scores of community family physicians in eight Arab countries are average. Information literacy, rather than computer literacy, is positively associated with the efficacy and efficiency of information retrieval at the point of care. There is room for improvement in evidence-based medicine curricula and continuous professional development to improve information literacy for better information retrieval and patient care.


Asunto(s)
Alfabetización Digital , Alfabetización en Salud , Alfabetización Informacional , Médicos de Familia , Humanos , Computadores , Estudios Transversales , Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
J Dev Behav Pediatr ; 43(7): 418-426, 2022 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35943374

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether children with developmental disorders (DDs) in protective custody are more likely to experience specific placement types and stay in care longer than their typically developing peers. Furthermore, in the DD-only group, we examined whether the likelihood of each placement type differed by specific DD diagnosis. METHODS: This observational retrospective study used child welfare administrative data linked to electronic health records in a large Ohio county. Participants were aged 5 to 20 years (N = 2787). DD diagnoses were determined using problem list and encounter diagnosis codes. RESULTS: Children with versus without DD were less likely to be in kinship placement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.94) and more likely to be in congregate care (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI: 1.04-1.53) and nonrelative foster care (aOR, 1.20; 95% CI: 1.00-1.45). A likelihood of independent living placement did not differ for those with and without DD. Those with versus without DD had longer lengths of stay in protective custody ( p ≤ 0.001), but the number of placement changes did not differ after accounting for length of stay. The pattern of results differed somewhat by individual DD diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Compared with their typically developing peers, children with DD are less likely to be in kinship care and tend to have longer lengths of stay in protective custody. If replicated, these findings suggest the need to identify and address mechanisms to support children with DD across placement settings and to better understand factors prolonging their protective custody stay.


Asunto(s)
Discapacidades del Desarrollo , Cuidados en el Hogar de Adopción , Niño , Protección a la Infancia , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/epidemiología , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/terapia , Cuidados en el Hogar de Adopción/métodos , Humanos , Grupo Paritario , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Health Info Libr J ; 39(2): 178-184, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35396788

RESUMEN

This study is based on Jumana Antoun's PhD thesis at Walden University, USA examining the information retrieval behaviour of 72 community family physicians' at the point of care in eight Arab countries in the Eastern Mediterranean. The key findings were that participants looked for digital clinical information at the point of care on average 14.0 times per week with the majority (80.3%) using a mobile phone. Clinical information about medication dosage and side effects was the most sought clinical question, and patient education was the least. Almost half of the participants considered that they often found relevant (55.6%), useful (56.9%) and unbiased (58.3%) information. Whilst none of the factors examined predicted the physicians' self-reported effectiveness and efficiency at information retrieval, the implication for practice points clearly to the barriers and the need for curricula to focus on search strategies using free resources at the point of care.


Asunto(s)
Médicos de Familia , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Árabes , Humanos , Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
ATS Sch ; 2(2): 265-277, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34409420

RESUMEN

Background: Dedicated ambulatory training during pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) fellowships is often limited. A novel 2-year longitudinal outpatient pulmonary fellowship curriculum was previously developed, piloted, and studied. The exportability and potential impact of this ambulatory curriculum on PCCM fellowship training nationally is not known. Objective: We aim to understand the current state of ambulatory training in PCCM fellowships and the impact of a standardized outpatient curriculum on fellows' ambulatory knowledge and competency. Methods: Nineteen programs participated in the study from 2017 to 2019. Six programs received the first year of content, seven programs received the entire 2-year curriculum, and seven programs served as a control. Fellows, faculty, and program directors (PDs) completed a series of surveys assessing satisfaction with ambulatory education and the curriculum. Fellows completed a series of medical knowledge inventories, and programs submitted in-training exam scores. Results: A total of 221 fellows (39%) and 17 PDs (89%) completed the precurriculum surveys, and 38 (12%) fellows and 10 (53%) PDs completed postcurriculum surveys. Before curriculum implementation, only 34.4% of fellows rated the quality of their ambulatory education as good or outstanding compared with 57.9% at the end of the study. Eighty-five percent of faculty and 89% of PDs rated the curriculum as good or excellent. Faculty believed that the teaching scripts were easy to use (78.4%), were factually accurate (86.3%), and provided high-yield information (82.1%). The majority of PDs indicated that the curriculum positively impacted patient care (78%) and fulfilled an unmet educational need (100%), and most planned to continue the curriculum after the study (78%). Feedback surrounded the need for updated content based on recently published guidelines and studies. Conclusion: The curriculum is a standardized and feasible way to address a previously unmet need in PCCM fellowship education. PDs rated the curriculum highly and most plan to continue it in the future. Our limited data set suggests that the curriculum was well received by fellows and faculty and positively impacted perceptions of ambulatory education and preparedness for independent practice. Future study with a larger sample of fellows is needed to better understand the generalizability of these findings.

5.
Teach Learn Med ; 27(1): 37-50, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25584470

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: PHENOMENON: Medical students receive much of their inpatient teaching from residents who now experience restructured teaching services to accommodate the 2011 duty-hour regulations (DHR). The effect of DHR on medical student educational experiences is unknown. We examined medical students' and clerkship directors' perceptions of the effects of the 2011 DHR on internal medicine clerkship students' experiences with teaching, feedback and evaluation, and patient care. APPROACH: Students at 14 institutions responded to surveys after their medicine clerkship or subinternship. Students who completed their clerkship (n = 839) and subinternship (n = 228) March to June 2011 (pre-DHR historical controls) were compared to clerkship students (n = 895) and subinterns (n = 377) completing these rotations March to June 2012 (post-DHR). Z tests for proportions correcting for multiple comparisons were performed to assess attitude changes. The Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine annual survey queried institutional members about the 2011 DHR just after implementation. FINDINGS: Survey response rates were 64% and 50% for clerkship students and 60% and 48% for subinterns in 2011 and 2012 respectively, and 82% (99/121) for clerkship directors. Post-DHR, more clerkship students agreed that attendings (p =.011) and interns (p =.044) provided effective teaching. Clerkship students (p =.013) and subinterns (p =.001) believed patient care became more fragmented. The percentage of holdover patients clerkship students (p =.001) and subinterns (p =.012) admitted increased. Clerkship directors perceived negative effects of DHR for students on all survey items. Most disagreed that interns (63.1%), residents (67.8%), or attendings (71.1%) had more time to teach. Most disagreed that students received more feedback from interns (56.0%) or residents (58.2%). Fifty-nine percent felt that students participated in more patient handoffs. INSIGHTS: Students perceive few adverse consequences of the 2011 DHR on their internal medicine experiences, whereas their clerkship director educators have negative perceptions. Future research should explore the impact of fragmented patient care on the student-patient relationship and students' clinical skills acquisition.


Asunto(s)
Prácticas Clínicas , Medicina Interna/educación , Internado y Residencia , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Adulto , Competencia Clínica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
6.
Acad Med ; 90(3): 345-54, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25295964

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To examine whether an Internet-based learning module and small-group debriefing can improve medical trainees' attitudes and communication skills toward patients with substance use disorders (SUDs). METHOD: In 2011-2012, 129 internal and family medicine residents and 370 medical students at two medical schools participated in a cluster randomized controlled trial, which assessed the effect of adding a two-part intervention to the SUDs curricula. The intervention included a self-directed, media-rich Internet-based learning module and a small-group, faculty-led debriefing. Primary study outcomes were changes in self-assessed attitudes in the intervention group (I-group) compared with those in the control group (C-group) (i.e., a difference of differences). For residents, the authors used real-time, Web-based interviews of standardized patients to assess changes in communication skills. Statistical analyses, conducted separately for residents and students, included hierarchical linear modeling, adjusted for site, participant type, cluster, and individual scores at baseline. RESULTS: The authors found no significant differences between the I- and C-groups in attitudes for residents or students at baseline. Compared with those in the C-group, residents, but not students, in the I-group had more positive attitudes toward treatment efficacy and self-efficacy at follow-up (P<.006). Likewise, compared with residents in the C-group, residents in the I-group received higher scores on screening and counseling skills during the standardized patient interview at follow-up (P=.0009). CONCLUSIONS: This intervention produced improved attitudes and communication skills toward patients with SUDs among residents. Enhanced attitudes and skills may result in improved care for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Comunicación , Instrucción por Computador , Curriculum , Internado y Residencia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Competencia Clínica , Análisis por Conglomerados , Educación a Distancia , Humanos , Internet , Autoeficacia , Autoevaluación (Psicología)
8.
J Grad Med Educ ; 6(1): 71-7, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24701314

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Residents receive little information about how they interact with patients. OBJECTIVE: This pilot study assessed the feasibility and validity of a new 16-item tool developed to assess patients' perspectives of interns' communication skills and professionalism and the team's communication. METHODS: Feasibility was determined by the percentage of surveys completed, the average time for survey completion, the percentage of target interns evaluated, and the mean number of evaluations per intern. Generalizability was analyzed using an (evaluator:evaluatee) × item model. Simulated D studies estimated optimal numbers of items and evaluators. Factor analysis with varimax rotation was used to examine the structure of the items. Scores were correlated with other measures of communication and professionalism for validation. RESULTS: Most patients (225 of 305 [74%]) completed the evaluation. Each survey took approximately 6.3 minutes to complete. In 43 days over 18 weeks, 45 of 50 interns (90%) were evaluated an average of 4.6 times. Fifty evaluations would be required to reach a minimally acceptable coefficient (0.57). Two factor structures were identified. The evaluation did not correlate with faculty evaluations of resident communication but did correlate weakly (r  =  0.140, P  =  .04) with standardized patient evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of patient evaluations are needed to reliably assess intern and team communication skills. Evaluations by patients add a perspective in assessing these skills that is different from those of faculty evaluations. Future work will focus on whether this new information adds to existing evaluation systems and warrants the added effort.

9.
J Gen Intern Med ; 28(8): 1008-13, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23595925

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Handoffs among post-graduate year 1 (PGY1) trainees occur with high frequency. Peer assessment of handoff competence would add a new perspective on how well the handoff information helped them to provide optimal patient care. OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study were to test the feasibility of the approach of an instrument for peer assessment of handoffs by meeting criteria of being able to use technology to capture evaluations in real time, exhibiting strong psychometric properties, and having high PGY1 satisfaction scores. DESIGN: An iPad® application was built for a seven-item handoff instrument. Over a two-month period, post-call PGY1s completed assessments of three co-PGY1s from whom they received handoffs the prior evening. PARTICIPANTS: Internal Medicine PGY1s at the University of Pennsylvania. MAIN MEASURES: ANOVA was used to explore interperson score differences (validity). Generalizability analyses provided estimates of score precision (reproducibility). PGY1s completed satisfaction surveys about the process. KEY RESULTS: Sixty-two PGY1s (100 %) participated in the study. 59 % of the targeted evaluations were completed. The major limitations were network connectivity and inability to find the post-call trainee. PGY1 scores on the single item of "overall competency" ranged from 4 to 9 with a mean of 7.31 (SD 1.09). Generalizability coefficients approached 0.60 for 10 evaluations per PGY1 for a single rotation and 12 evaluations per PGY1 across multiple rotations. The majority of PGY1s believed that they could adequately assess handoff competence and that the peer assessment process was valuable (70 and 77 %, respectively). CONCLUSION: Psychometric properties of an instrument for peer assessment of handoffs are encouraging. Obtaining 10 or 12 evaluations per PGY1 allowed for reliable assessment of handoff skills. Peer evaluations of handoffs using mobile technology were feasible, and were well received by PGY1s.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Computadoras de Mano/normas , Internado y Residencia/normas , Revisión por Expertos de la Atención de Salud/normas , Computadoras de Mano/tendencias , Recolección de Datos/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Internado y Residencia/tendencias , Revisión por Expertos de la Atención de Salud/métodos , Revisión por Expertos de la Atención de Salud/tendencias , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos
10.
J Grad Med Educ ; 4(2): 209-14, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23730443

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Improving handoff communications is a National Patient Safety Goal. Interns and residents are rarely taught how to safely handoff their patients. Our objective was to determine whether teaching safe handoff principles would improve handoff quality. METHODS: Our study was conducted on the inpatient services at 2 teaching hospitals. In this single-institution, randomized controlled trial, internal medicine interns (N  =  44) and residents (N  =  24) participated in a 45-minute educational session on safe handoff communication skills. Residents received additional education on effective feedback practices and were asked to provide each intern with structured feedback. Quality of interns' electronic and verbal handoffs was measured by using a Handoff Evaluation Tool created by the authors. The frequency of handoff communication failures was also assessed through semistructured phone interviews of postcall interns. RESULTS: Interns who received handoff education demonstrated superior verbal handoff skills than control interns (P < .001), while no difference was seen in electronic handoff skills. Communication failures related to code status (P < .001) and overnight tasks (P < .050) were less frequent in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: Interns' electronic handoff documentation skills did not improve with the intervention. This may reflect greater difficulty in changing physicians' electronic documentation habits.

11.
J Allied Health ; 32(1): 10-7, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12665288

RESUMEN

There have been numerous changes in the health care system, including cost-containment efforts, the increased growth of managed care, and shortages of many health professionals. It is important to assess the impact these changes are having on the quality of health care delivery and the way various health professionals view their jobs. To accomplish this assessment, a sample of experienced nursing and allied health professionals were asked to provide their assessment of positive and negative changes in the health system over a 5-year period. They also were asked to indicate their level of satisfaction with their profession, their current job, and various aspects of that job. A Health Care Environment Survey was mailed to six groups of graduates of a mid-Atlantic college of health professions. Three of the groups had been in practice for 5 years, and three of the groups had been in practice for 10 years. The survey asked respondents to assess the magnitude of certain changes in the health system over the previous 5 years and to provide an assessment of their satisfaction with their current job. A total of 1,610 surveys were mailed, and 787 were returned for a rate of 49%. Nursing and allied health professionals who responded to the survey reported that there have been many more negative than positive changes in the health care system, including less job security, efficiency, and time available to spend with individual patients and increases in workload, paperwork, and control of health care by insurance companies. Even with these negative changes, nurses and allied health professionals report a high level of satisfaction with their jobs. In investigating the aspects of their jobs that were most related to satisfaction, having a feeling of worthwhile accomplishment from their job, opportunities for personal and professional growth, recognition and satisfaction with their workload were found to be the best predictors of job satisfaction.


Asunto(s)
Técnicos Medios en Salud/psicología , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Personal de Enfermería/psicología , Adulto , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Mid-Atlantic Region , Escuelas para Profesionales de Salud
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA