RESUMEN
For almost two decades, 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been the only class I recommendation on DAPT in American and European guidelines, which has resulted in 12-month durations of DAPT therapy being the most frequently implemented in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) across the globe. Twelve-month DAPT was initially grounded in the results of the CURE (Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events) trial, which, by design, studied DAPT versus no DAPT rather than the optimal DAPT duration. The average DAPT duration in this study was 9 months, not 12 months. Subsequent ACS studies, which were not designed to assess DAPT duration, rather its composition (aspirin with prasugrel or ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel) were further interpreted as supportive evidence for 12-month DAPT duration. In these studies, the median DAPT duration was 9 or 15 months for ticagrelor and prasugrel, respectively. Several subsequent studies questioned the 12-month regimen and suggested that DAPT duration should either be fewer than 12 months in patients at high bleeding risk or more than 12 months in patients at high ischemic risk who can safely tolerate the treatment. Bleeding, rather than ischemic risk assessment, has emerged as a treatment modifier for maximizing the net clinical benefit of DAPT, due to excessive bleeding and no clear benefit of prolonged treatment regimens in high bleeding risk patients. Multiple DAPT de-escalation treatment strategies, including switching from prasugrel or ticagrelor to clopidogrel, reducing the dose of prasugrel or ticagrelor, and shortening DAPT duration while maintaining monotherapy with ticagrelor, have been consistently shown to reduce bleeding without increasing fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular or cerebral ischemic risks compared with 12-month DAPT. However, 12-month DAPT remains the only class-I DAPT recommendation for patients with ACS despite the lack of prospectively established evidence, leading to unnecessary and potentially harmful overtreatment in many patients. It is time for clinical practice and guideline recommendations to be updated to reflect the totality of the evidence regarding the optimal DAPT duration in ACS.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Humanos , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Clorhidrato de Prasugrel/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Prasugrel/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Prasugrel/efectos adversos , Esquema de MedicaciónRESUMEN
Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is an acute cause of heart failure characterized by a reversible left ventricular (LV) impairment usually induced by a physical or emotional trigger. TTS is not always a benign disease since it is associated with a relatively higher risk of life-threatening complications, such as cardiogenic shock, ventricular arrhythmias, respiratory failure, cardiopulmonary resuscitation and death. Despite notable advancements in the management of patients with TTS, physiopathological mechanisms underlying transient LV dysfunction remain largely unknown. Since TTS carries similar prognostic implications than acute myocardial infarction, the identification of mechanisms and predictors of worse prognosis remain key to establish appropriate treatments. The greater prevalence of TTS among post-menopausal women and the activation of the neuro-cardiac axis triggered by physical or emotional stressors paved the way forward to several studies focused on coronary microcirculation and impaired blood flow as the main physiopathological mechanisms of TTS. However, whether microvascular dysfunction is the cause or a consequence of transient LV impairment remains still unsettled. This review provides an up-to-date summary of available evidence supporting the role of microvascular dysfunction in TTS pathogenesis, summarizing contemporary invasive and non-invasive diagnostic techniques for its assessment. We will also discuss novel techniques focused on microvascular dysfunction in TTS which may support clinicians for the implementation of tailored treatments.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Despite the growing awareness towards the importance of adequate representation of women in clinical trials among patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), available evidence continues to demonstrate a skewed distribution of study populations in favour of men. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this pre-specified analysis from the MASTER DAPT screening log and trial, we aimed to investigate the existence of a negative selection bias for women inclusion in a randomized clinical trial. A total of 2847 consecutive patients who underwent coronary revascularization across 65 participating sites, during a median of 14 days, were entered in the screening log, including 1749 (61.4%) non-high bleeding risk (HBR) and 1098 (38.6%) HBR patients, of whom 109 (9.9%) consented for trial participation. Female patients were less represented in consented versus non-consented HBR patients (22% versus 30%, absolute standardized difference: 0.18) and among non-consented eligible versus consented eligible patients (absolute standardized difference 0.14). The observed sex gap was primarily due investigators' choice not to offer study participation to females because deemed at very high risk of bleeding and/or ischemic complications, and only marginally to a slightly higher propensity of females compared to males to refuse study participation. CONCLUSIONS: Female HBR patients undergoing PCI are less prevalent, but also less likely to participate in the trial than male patients, mainly due to investigators' preference.
Asunto(s)
Selección de Paciente , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sesgo de Selección , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Factores Sexuales , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapiaRESUMEN
AIMS: Screening logs have the potential to appraise the actual prevalence and distribution of predefined patient subsets, avoiding selection biases, which are inevitably and potentially present in randomised trials and real-world registries, respectively. We aimed to assess the prevalence of high bleeding risk (HBR) characteristics in the real world and the external validity of the MASTER DAPT trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for at least two consecutive weeks across 65 sites participating in the trial were entered into a screening log. Of 2,847 consecutive patients, 1,098 (38.6 %) were HBR and 109 (9.9 %) consented for trial participation. PRECISE-DAPT score ≥ 25 was the most frequent HBR feature, followed by advanced age, use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) and anaemia. Compared with consecutive HBR patients, consenting patients were older (≥ 75 years: 69 % versus 62 %, absolute standardized difference [SD] 0.16), more frequently male (78 % versus 71 %, absolute SD 0.18), had higher use of OAC (38 % versus 20 %, absolute SD 0.39), treatment with steroids or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (10 % versus 5 %, SD 0.16), and prior cerebrovascular events (10 % versus 6 %, absolute SD 0.18) but lower PRECISE DAPT score ≥ 25 (54 % versus 66 %, absolute SD 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: The HBR criteria distribution differed between consecutive versus selectively included HBR patients, suggesting the existence of selection biases in the trial population.
Asunto(s)
Hemorragia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Riesgo , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Medición de Riesgo , Selección de Paciente , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/efectos adversos , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/métodosAsunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Colchicina , Piridinas , Tiazoles , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Colchicina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2 , Tiazoles/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Complement-stimulated neutrophils are able to adhere to the endothelium and damage endothelial cells both in vitro and in vivo. These blood cells participate in the early stages, growth and complications of atherosclerotic plaques. Recent findings, based on mendelian randomization analysis, support the concept that high neutrophil counts are a causal risk factor for ischemic heart disease and myocardial infarction . Clopidogrel decreases leukocyte count and inflammatory markers in patients with acute coronary syndromes; this off-target effect, which is independent of the antiplatelet action, may help explaining secondary prevention data showing a superiority of clopidogrel over aspirin in reducing new cardiovascular events.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Clopidogrel , Neutrófilos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Neutrófilos/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/farmacología , Recuento de Leucocitos , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Ticlopidina/uso terapéutico , Análisis de la Aleatorización Mendeliana , Infarto del MiocardioAsunto(s)
Morfina , Agregación Plaquetaria , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y , Humanos , Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos de los fármacos , Morfina/farmacología , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/farmacología , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/farmacología , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with a systemic and local inflammatory response with edema. However, their role at the tissue level is poorly characterized. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to characterize T2 values of the noninfarcted myocardium (NIM) and surrounding tissue and to investigate prognostic relevance of higher NIM T2 values after STEMI. METHODS: A total of 171 consecutive patients with STEMI without prior cardiovascular events who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance after primary percutaneous coronary intervention were analyzed in terms of standard infarct characteristics. Edema of the NIM, liver, spleen, and pectoralis muscle was assessed based on T2 mapping. Follow-up was available for 130 patients. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, unplanned coronary revascularization or rehospitalization for heart failure. The median time from primary percutaneous coronary intervention to cardiac magnetic resonance was 3 days (IQR: 2-5 days). RESULTS: Higher (above the median value of 45 ms) T2 values in the NIM area were associated with larger infarct size, microvascular obstruction, and left ventricular dysfunction and did not correlate with C-reactive protein, white blood cells, or T2 values of the pectoralis muscle, liver, and spleen. At a median follow-up of 17 months, patients with higher (>45 ms) NIM T2 values had increased risk of MACE (P < 0.001) compared with subjects with NIM T2 values ≤45 ms, mainly caused by a higher rate of myocardial reinfarction (26.3% vs 1.4%; P < 0.001). At multivariable analysis, higher NIM T2 values independently predicted MACE (HR: 2.824 [95% CI: 1.254-6.361]; P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Higher NIM T2 values after STEMI are independently associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes, mainly because of higher risk of myocardial infarction.
Asunto(s)
Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Anciano , Miocardio/patología , Factores de Tiempo , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Edema Cardíaco/diagnóstico por imagen , Edema Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Edema Cardíaco/etiología , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Readmisión del Paciente , Músculos Pectorales/diagnóstico por imagen , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Hígado/patología , Bazo/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Antithrombotic therapy represents the cornerstone of the pharmacological treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The optimal combination and duration of antithrombotic therapy is still matter of debate requiring a critical assessment of patient comorbidities, clinical presentation, revascularization modality, and/or optimization of medical treatment. The 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of patients with ACS encompassing both patients with and without ST segment elevation ACS have been recently published. Shortly before, a European expert consensus task force produced guidance for clinicians on the management of antithrombotic therapy in patients with ACS as well as chronic coronary syndrome. The scope of this manuscript is to provide a critical appraisal of differences and similarities between the European consensus paper and the latest ESC recommendations on oral antithrombotic regimens in ACS patients.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Cardiología , Humanos , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , ConsensoRESUMEN
Importance: Abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces bleeding with no increase in ischemic events in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Objectives: To evaluate the association of sex with the comparative effectiveness of abbreviated vs standard DAPT in patients with HBR. Design, Setting, and Patients: This prespecified subgroup comparative effectiveness analysis followed the Management of High Bleeding Risk Patients Post Bioresorbable Polymer Coated Stent Implantation With an Abbreviated vs Standard DAPT Regimen (MASTER DAPT) trial, a multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial conducted at 140 sites in 30 countries and performed from February 28, 2017, to December 5, 2019. A total of 4579 patients with HBR were randomized at 1 month after PCI to abbreviated or standard DAPT. Data were analyzed from July 1 to October 31, 2022. Interventions: Abbreviated (immediate DAPT discontinuation, followed by single APT for ≥6 months) or standard (DAPT for ≥2 additional months, followed by single APT for 11 months) treatment groups. Main Outcomes and Measures: One-year net adverse clinical events (NACEs) (a composite of death due to any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or major bleeding), major adverse cardiac or cerebral events (MACCEs) (a composite of death due to any cause, myocardial infarction, or stroke), and major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (MCB). Results: Of the 4579 patients included in the analysis, 1408 (30.7%) were women and 3171 (69.3%) were men (mean [SD] age, 76.0 [8.7] years). Ischemic and bleeding events were similar between sexes. Abbreviated DAPT was associated with comparable NACE rates in men (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97 [95% CI, 0.75-1.24]) and women (HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.60-1.26]; P = .65 for interaction). There was evidence of heterogeneity of treatment effect by sex for MACCEs, with a trend toward benefit in women (HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.44-1.05]) but not in men (HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.88-1.55]; P = .04 for interaction). There was no significant interaction for MCB across sex, although the benefit with abbreviated DAPT was relatively greater in men (HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.50-0.84]) than in women (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.53-1.12]; P = .46 for interaction). Results remained consistent in patients with acute coronary syndrome and/or complex PCI. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that women with HBR did not experience higher rates of ischemic or bleeding events compared with men and may derive particular benefit from abbreviated compared with standard DAPT owing to these numerically lower rates of events. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03023020.
Asunto(s)
Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Isquemia/inducido químicamente , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An excessive inflammatory response and a hypercoagulable state are not infrequent in patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. However, the optimal treatment strategy for COVID-19 patients managed in the out-of-hospital setting is still uncertain. DESIGN: The CONVINCE (NCT04516941) is an investigator-initiated, open-label, blinded-endpoint, 2â×â2 factorial design randomized trial aimed at assessing two independently tested hypotheses (anticoagulation and anti-inflammatory ones) in COVID-19 patients. Adult symptomatic patients (≥18âyears of age) within 7âdays from reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection managed at home or in nursery settings were considered for eligibility. Eligible patients fulfilling all inclusion and no exclusion criteria were randomized to edoxaban versus no treatment (anticoagulation hypothesis) and colchicine versus no treatment (anti-inflammatory hypothesis) in a 1â:â1:1â:â1 ratio. The study had two co-primary endpoints (one for each randomization), including the composite of major vascular thrombotic events at 25â±â3âdays for the anticoagulation hypothesis and the composite of SARS-CoV-2 detection rates at 14â±â3âdays by RT-PCR or freedom from death or hospitalizations (anti-inflammatory hypothesis). Study endpoints will be adjudicated by a blinded Clinical Events Committee. With a final sample size of 420 patients, this study projects an 80% power for each of the two primary endpoints appraised separately. CONCLUSION: The CONVINCE trial aims at determining whether targeting anticoagulation and/or anti-inflammatory pathways may confer benefit in COVID-19 patients managed in the out-of-hospital setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04516941.