RESUMEN
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, often diagnosed at the advanced stage (metastatic). Treatment options for metastatic NSCLC include radiotherapy, chemotherapy, target drug therapy, and immunotherapy. Immunotherapy (utilization of checkpoint inhibitors) boosts the immune system to recognize and destroy cancer cells. However, it is often associated with immune-related complications such as pneumonitis. This review aims to determine the incidence of pneumonitis in metastatic NSCLC patients treated with different immunotherapy drugs. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were scoured for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until October 2023. Published RCTs with similar research objectives were included, while non-English articles, reviews, case reports, ongoing trials, non-randomized studies, conference abstracts, and studies on small cell lung cancer (SCLC) were excluded. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) was used to assess the risk of bias among the included studies. The statistical analyses were performed with the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. The subgroup analysis of the 16 included RCTs showed that metastatic NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab and pembrolizumab had a higher incidence of any grade pneumonitis than those treated with atezolizumab (4.5% and 5.1% vs. 1.6%, respectively). Similarly, the incidence of grade ≥3 pneumonitis was higher among patients receiving nivolumab (1.3%) and pembrolizumab (2.4%) than those receiving atezolizumab (0.7%). Furthermore, the subgroup analysis showed that patients with naive-treated NSCLC on immunotherapy had a higher incidence of any grade pneumonitis than those with previously treated NSCLC (6.5% vs. 3.9%). Treatment-naive patients recorded higher grade ≥3 pneumonitis incidences than those previously treated (3.1% vs. 1.3%). Programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors (i.e., pembrolizumab and nivolumab) have higher incidences of pneumonitis than programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors (atezolizumab).
RESUMEN
Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is a malignancy that commonly appears as lesions on the skin or mucosal surfaces but can also develop in other organs. This cancer is usually caused by the human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8), recently known as Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV). KS is rare in the general population but can develop in kidney transplant recipients with varying incidence due to immunocompromised status from immunosuppression. The main aim of the present systematic review was to identify the prevalence and treatment of KS in kidney transplant patients. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies until October 2023. Full-text studies with similar research objectives were included, while non-English articles, reviews, case reports, ongoing clinical trials, and studies evaluating KS in HIV patients or after other solid organ transplants were excluded. All studies were observational; therefore, methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The statistical analyses were performed with the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software (Biostat, Inc. Englewood, NJ). The pooled analysis from the 15 studies included showed that KS develops in 1.5% of kidney transplant recipients and is more prevalent in African (1.7%) and Middle Eastern (1.7%) recipients than in Western recipients (0.07%). KS was also significantly more prevalent among male recipients than female recipients (OR: 2.36; p < 0.0001). Additionally, cyclosporine-based immunosuppression accounts for most KS incidences (79.6%) compared to azathioprine-based immunosuppression (28.2%). Furthermore, reduction or withdrawal of immunosuppression alone resulted in 47.8% KS complete remissions. Post-kidney transplantation KS is more frequent among males and patients of Middle Eastern and African origin. However, the gender difference may be attributed to most patients undergoing kidney transplants being male. Therefore, if gender balance is considered in future studies, then the difference might be insignificant. Based on our results, we can concur that the mainstay treatment for post-transplant KS is reduction or withdrawal of immunosuppression. However, the patients should be closely monitored to avoid KS recurrence and kidney rejection. Furthermore, there is an increased risk for KS with the use of cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. However, this does not mean that the withdrawal of this immunosuppression agent might result in improved KS outcomes because the withdrawal of azathioprine with or without cyclosporine reduction has also led to improved outcomes.