RESUMEN
Dentofacial deformities are characterized by abnormalities in craniofacial development that affects the individual's skeletal and occlusion, often causing functional and esthetic problems. In literature, there is an involvement of polymorphisms in estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) and estrogen receptor 2 (ESR2) genes in craniofacial measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate a possible association between polymorphisms in ESR1 (rs2234693 and rs9340799) and ESR2 (rs1256049 and rs4986938) genes with cephalometric measurements in individuals with dentofacial deformities. This cross-sectional study was performed with 158 individuals in the preoperative period of orthognathic surgery. The cephalometric measurements obtained through lateral cephalogram using Dolphin Imaging software. For genetic analysis, the DNA extracted from epithelial cells of the oral mucosa and were genotyped using the real-time polymerase chain reaction. The data found submitted to statistical analysis, through the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Mann-Whitney, and Kruskal-Wallis tests, using the IBM SPSS software version 24.0. Considered a significance level of 0.05. We found association between polymorphisms and cephalometric measurements just in the female sex. The polymorphisms ESR1/rs9340799 ( P= 0.003), ESR1/rs2234693 ( P= 0.026), and ESR2/rs1256049 ( P= 0.046) were associated with the upper gonial angle (Ar-Go-N). The polymorphism ESR2/rs1256049 was also associated with the facial axis-rickets (NBa-PtGn) ( P= 0.004), anterior cranial base (SN) ( P= 0.036), and Y-axis (SGn-SN) ( P= 0.031).
Asunto(s)
Deformidades Dentofaciales , Receptor alfa de Estrógeno , Femenino , Humanos , Receptor alfa de Estrógeno/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Estudios Transversales , Estética Dental , Receptor beta de Estrógeno/genética , Predisposición Genética a la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate if single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) and bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) are associated with different craniofacial patterns. Furthermore, we also investigated if RUNX2 and BMP2 expression in the maxilla and mandible are differently expressed according to facial phenotypes and influenced by the SNPs in their encoding genes. Orthognathic patients were included. Materials and Methods: Lateral cephalometric radiographs were used to classify facial phenotypes based on Steiner's ANB and Ricketts' NBa-PtGn angles. Bone samples from 21 patients collected during orthognathic surgery were used for the gene expression assays. DNA from 129 patients was used for genotyping the SNPs rs59983488 and rs1200425 in RUNX2 and rs235768 and rs1005464 in BMP2. The established alpha was 5%. Results: A statistically significant difference was observed in the relative BMP2 expression in the mandible between Class I and III participants (P = 0.042). Homozygous GG (rs59983488) had higher RUNX2 expression (P = 0.036) in the mandible. In maxilla, GG (rs1200425) had a higher BMP2 expression (P = 0.038). Discussion: In conclusion, BMP2 is expressed differently in the mandible of Class I and Class III participants. Genetic polymorphisms in RUNX2 and BMP2 are associated with their relative gene expression.
RESUMEN
This study aimed to investigate the kinetics and thermodynamic of the phenolics degradation and the kinetics of degradation of the total color difference of yacon juice microcapsules produced by spray drying using Gum Arabic and polydextrose as wall materials. The degradation of the microcapsule was evaluated by accelerated tests under controlled conditions at 35 and 45 °C, and relative humidity of 75 and 90%, for 35 days. Degradation of phenolics followed the first order model and the degradation constant was in the range of 0.0124-0.0209 days-1. The microparticles with gum Arabic were more stable than those with polydextrose for all conditions studied, with longer half-lives. Both wall materials showed similar thermodynamic characteristics, indicating similar mechanism of degradation of phenolics. With respect to the color parameters, the first order model adjusted to data of the total color difference, and no significant differences were observed for the conditions studied.