RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In acute stroke, large vessel occlusion (LVO) should be promptly identified to guide patient's transportation directly to comprehensive stroke centers (CSC) for mechanical thrombectomy (MT). In many cases, prehospital multi-parameter scores are used by trained emergency teams to identify patients with high probability of LVO. However, in several countries, the first aid organization without intervention of skilled staff precludes the on-site use of such scores. Here, we assessed the accuracy of LVO prediction using a single parameter (i.e. complete hemiplegia) obtained by bystander's telephone-based witnessing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This observational, single-center study included consecutive patients who underwent intravenous thrombolysis at the primary stroke center and/or were directly transferred to a CSC for MT, from January 1, 2015 to March 1, 2020. We defined two groups: patients with initial hemiplegia (no movement in one arm and leg and facial palsy) and patients without initial hemiplegia, on the basis of a bystander's witnessing. RESULTS: During the study time, 874 patients were included [mean age 73 years (SD 13.8), 56.7% men], 320 with initial hemiplegia and 554 without. The specificity of the hemiplegia criterion to predict LVO was 0.88, but its sensitivity was only 0.53. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the presence of hemiplegia as witnessed by a bystander can predict LVO with high specificity. This single criterion could be used for decision-making about direct transfer to CSC for MT when the absence of emergency skilled staff precludes the patient's on-site assessment, especially in regions distant from a CSC.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , TriajeRESUMEN
Purpose: Few data are available on complications occurring during inter-hospital transfer from a primary stroke center (PSC) to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) for endovascular treatment (EVT) after large vessel occlusion (LVO). Therefore, we prospectively studied data from consecutive patients transferred from our PSC to the next CSC during 4 years to determine the incidence and risk factors of complications during transfer. Methods: This observational, single-center study included consecutive patients transferred from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018. During inter-hospital transfer, all medical incidents were systematically recorded. A new complete clinical examination was performed on arrival at the CSC. Results: Among the 253 patients transferred to the CSC during the study period, 68 (26.9%) had one or more complications. In 11 patients (4.3%) these were life-threatening and required emergency intervention by a physician. Baseline characteristics were not different between patients with and without complications, except for the LVO location. Specifically, basilar artery (BA) occlusion was strongly associated with complications during the transport (p < 0.0005). Conclusion: Complications occurred in 26.9% of patients during transfer. Only BA occlusion could predict complication during transfer. Future studies should identify variables to help stratifying patients at high and low risk of complications during transportation.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/complicaciones , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/complicaciones , Transferencia de Pacientes , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Hospitales , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/terapiaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The current guidelines advocate the implementation of stroke networks to organize endovascular treatment (ET) for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) after transfer from a Primary Stroke Centre (PSC) to a Comprehensive Stroke Centre (CSC). In France and in many other countries around the world, these transfers are carried out by a physician-led mobile medical team. However, with the recent broadening of ET indications, their availability is becoming more and more critical. Here, we retrospectively analysed data of patients transferred from a PSC to a CSC for potential ET to identify predictive factors of major complications (MC) at departure and during transport that absolutely require the presence of a physician during interhospital transfer. METHODS: This observational, single-centre study included patients with evidence of intracranial LVO transferred for ET from Perpignan to a 156 km-distant CSC between January 1, 2015 and -December 31, 2018. We compared 2 groups: MC group (patients who required emergency intervention by the medical team due to life-threatening complications, including need of mechanical ventilation at departure) and non-MC group (all other patients who experienced no or only minor complications that could be managed by the emergency paramedics alone). RESULTS: Among the 253 patients who were transferred to the CSC, 185 (73.1%) had no complication, 57 (22.6%) minor complications, and 11 (4.3%) had MC. In multivariate analysis, MC was associated with basilar artery (BA) occlusion (p < 0.0001), initial National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score >22 (p < 0.005), and history of atrial fibrillation (p < 0.04). Among the 168 patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), only 1 patient (0.6%) had MC due to an IVT-related adverse event during transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Physician-led inter-hospital transports are warranted for patients with BA occlusion, initial NIHSS score >22, or history of atrial fibrillation. For the other patients, transfer without a physician may be considered, even if treated with IVT.