Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Radiol Med ; 120(12): 1138-45, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26088470

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To implement a hardware and software system able to perform the major functions of an Open-Source PACS, and to analyze it in a simulated real-world environment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A small home network was implemented, and the Open-Source operating system Ubuntu 11.10 was installed in a laptop containing the Dcm4chee suite with the software devices needed. RESULTS: The Open-Source PACS implemented is compatible with Linux OS, Microsoft OS, and Mac OS X; furthermore, it was used with operating systems that guarantee the operation in portable devices (smartphone, tablet) Android and iOS. CONCLUSIONS: An OSS PACS is useful for making tutorials and workshops on post-processing techniques for educational and training purposes.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Información Radiológica/instrumentación , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Programas Informáticos
2.
Radiol Med ; 120(3): 309-23, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25024063

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the use of open source software (OSS) to process DICOM images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We selected 23 programs for Windows and 20 programs for Mac from 150 possible OSS programs including DICOM viewers and various tools (converters, DICOM header editors, etc.). The programs selected all meet the basic requirements such as free availability, stand-alone application, presence of graphical user interface, ease of installation and advanced features beyond simple display monitor. Capabilities of data import, data export, metadata, 2D viewer, 3D viewer, support platform and usability of each selected program were evaluated on a scale ranging from 1 to 10 points. RESULTS: Twelve programs received a score higher than or equal to eight. Among them, five obtained a score of 9: 3D Slicer, MedINRIA, MITK 3M3, VolView, VR Render; while OsiriX received 10. CONCLUSIONS: OsiriX appears to be the only program able to perform all the operations taken into consideration, similar to a workstation equipped with proprietary software, allowing the analysis and interpretation of images in a simple and intuitive way. OsiriX is a DICOM PACS workstation for medical imaging and software for image processing for medical research, functional imaging, 3D imaging, confocal microscopy and molecular imaging. This application is also a good tool for teaching activities because it facilitates the attainment of learning objectives among students and other specialists.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen , Sistemas de Información Radiológica , Programas Informáticos , Diagnóstico por Imagen/métodos , Humanos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Validación de Programas de Computación , Interfaz Usuario-Computador
3.
Radiol Med ; 120(5): 466-73, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25412816

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study was done to evaluate the appropriateness of dose indices in computed tomography (CT) by comparing the body computed tomography dose index (CTDI) and the size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) to determine which of these two parameters is more appropriate to estimate the radiation dose to both adult and paediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed 150 thoracic CT and 150 abdominal CT scans, half of which from adult patients and the other half from paediatric patients. We compared the values of the CTDIvol and the SSDE reporting the average, maximum and minimum percentage difference for each body region and depending on the age of the patients. RESULTS: In the thoracic CT and abdominal CT scans, we found values of difference between the SSDE and the CTDIvol of 26.3 and 27.3 %, respectively, in adult patients and of 46.9 and 48.5 % in paediatric patients. CONCLUSIONS: The SSDE is a good tool for estimating the average radiation dose for a given patient depending on the input parameters and the dimensions of the specific person in question before a CT examination.


Asunto(s)
Dosis de Radiación , Radiometría/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada Espiral/métodos , Adolescente , Carga Corporal (Radioterapia) , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Fantasmas de Imagen , Programas Informáticos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA