RESUMEN

Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) significantly disrupts vital renal functions and is a common and serious condition in intensive care units (ICUs). AKI leads to extended hospital stays, increases mortality rates, and often necessitates nephrology consultations. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) plays a central role in managing AKI, requiring a multidisciplinary approach involving nephrologists, intensivists, and anesthesiologists. This study examines the clinical profile and progression of AKI in ICU patients requiring CRRT, with a focus on CRRT indications and modalities. Materials and Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study on ICU patients with AKI requiring CRRT from January to December 2019. AKI diagnosis followed the RIFLE criteria, and patients who received CRRT for less than 36 h were excluded. Data collected included demographics, hemodynamic parameters, and renal function parameters, with follow-ups at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months. Statistical analyses evaluated outcomes and transitions between CRRT and other renal replacement therapies. Results: Among 123 evaluated patients, 95 met inclusion criteria. Fifteen patients received CRRT for less than 36 h, with an early mortality rate of 80%. The final cohort comprised 80 patients who underwent CRRT for over 36 h, with a mean age of 65.3 years (SD = 13.6) and a Charlson index of 6.4. Patients were categorized based on primary diagnosis into heart failure, cardiac surgery, sepsis, other surgeries, and miscellanea groups. Mortality rates were highest in the heart failure and miscellanea groups. Significant variability was observed in therapy transitions and long-term outcomes. Continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) was the most frequently used CRRT modality. Conclusions: This study highlights the variability in CRRT practices and the poor prognosis for critically ill patients with AKI requiring CRRT. Timely nephrology consultation and tailored treatment plans may improve patient outcomes and optimize CRRT utilization. Future research should focus on refining CRRT protocols and exploring preventive strategies for AKI.

RESUMEN

Background/Objectives: GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as fundamental components in the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients (T2DM) with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The oral formulation represents a novel therapeutic tool but may affect drug efficacy. This study sought to compare the effectiveness of subcutaneous versus oral semaglutide formulations in patients with CKD. Methods: A retrospective study in a real-world setting compared type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease patients, initiating oral semaglutide treatment to a historically matched control group treated with subcutaneous semaglutide. The matching considered factors such as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), age, and sex. Results: Nineteen patients were included in both groups, with a mean age of 68.0. Seventy-two percent were males with a CKD-EPI eGFR of 49.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 and a median urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio of 12.7 mg/g. Of the study participants, 94% and 79% of patients were on the maximum semaglutide sbc vs. oral dose, while 5.3% and 15.8% were on the sbc vs. oral low dose. Oral semaglutide significantly reduced HbA1C and BMI, identical to the control group (-0.9 and -1.4, p > 0.05). Renal function parameters and blood pressure remained stable throughout the follow-up in both groups. The main side effect was digestive intolerance (affecting three patients in the oral group and two patients in the subcutaneous group, p = 0.6), although the treatment abandonment percentage was similar. Conclusions: The oral formulation of semaglutide demonstrated equivalent effectiveness in glucose control and body weight management in patients with T2DM and CKD, even with a higher proportion of patients receiving low to medium doses. Gastrointestinal side effects were comparable between both oral and subcutaneous formulations.

RESUMEN

(1) Background: Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) increase uric acid excretion. The intensity of uricosuria is linked to glycosuria. (2) Methods: We aim to analyze the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on urinary fractional excretion (FE) of uric acid and glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in a single-center retrospective study with patients with T2DM and CKD who started on treatment with SGLT2is. Patients on renal replacement therapy or with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP1) analogs were excluded. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the SGLT2i molecule, the main comorbidities, and concomitant treatment. As a secondary objective, the study analyzed the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on uricemia levels. (3) Results: Seventy-three patients were analyzed, with a mean follow-up of 1.2 years. Uric acid and glucose FE significantly increased after the initiation of SGLT2is. This increase remained stable during the follow-up without differences among eGFR groups. No significant reduction in uricemia was observed. However, a trend towards a decrease was observed. (4) Conclusion: The use of SGLT2is in patients with CKD and T2DM is associated with an increase in uric acid FE, which maintains stability irrespective of glomerular filtration loss at least during 24 months of follow-up.

RESUMEN

Background: Cardiorenal programs have emerged to improve the management of cardiorenal disease (CRD). Evidence about the benefits of these programs is still scarce. This work aims to evaluate the performance of a novel cardiorenal program and describe the clinical profile and outcomes of patients with CRD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients with CRD attended in a cardiorenal unit (CRU) from February 2021 to February 2022. Demographics and laboratory tests were collected and events (all-cause death and cardiovascular hospitalizations) were evaluated. Optimization of comorbidities and protective therapies was also assessed. Results: Eighty-two patients were included, with a mean age of 76.8 years [standard deviation (SD) 8.5] and 72% were men. A total of 58.5% (n = 47) had left ventricular ejection fraction <50%. The mean follow-up was 11 months (SD 4.0). Almost 54% of the patients (n = 44) required hospitalization, 30.5% for heart failure (HF) decompensation. Total hospitalizations significantly decreased after CRU inclusion: 0.70 versus 0.45 admissions/year (P < .02). Global mortality was 17.1% (n = 14). The percentage of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction on quadruple therapy increased by 20%, and up to 60% of the patients were on three drugs. A total of 39% of the patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction started treatment with sodium-glucose co-transporter inhibitors. Hyperkalaemia required the use of potassium binders in 12.2% of the patients and treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism was started in 42.7% and renal anaemia in 23.2%. Renal replacement therapy was initiated in 10% of the patients (n = 8). Conclusion: CRD confers a considerable risk of adverse outcomes. Cardiorenal programs may improve cardiorenal syndrome management by optimizing therapies, treating comorbidities and reducing hospitalizations.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a risk factor for death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and COVID-19 may cause acute kidney injury (AKI) which also influences outcomes. There is little information on the independent contribution of CKD and AKI to the risk of death in COVID-19 on different waves, as CKD is a key risk factor for AKI. Methods: We have studied the epidemiology of CKD and AKI in 2878 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and their independent association with in-hospital mortality in the two largest pre-vaccination COVID-19 waves in Madrid, Spain. Hospitalized COVID-19 patients were grouped into four mutually exclusive categories: previous-CKD, community-acquired AKI (CA-AKI), hospital-acquired AKI (HA-AKI) and normal renal function throughout hospitalization. Results: Pre-existent or acquired kidney involvement was observed in 35.5% and 36.8% of COVID-19 patients in the 1st and 3rd waves, respectively. Overall, 13.9% of patients with normal kidney function on arrival developed HA-AKI. In the 3rd wave, CA-AKI was more common than in the 1st wave. Overall, 9%-20% of CKD cases and 22%-40% of AKI cases remained undiagnosed in the discharge report. CKD, CA-AKI and HA-AKI were independently associated with risk of death in multivariate analysis, with HA-AKI, which was usually mild, being the most relevant independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality. A model including kidney involvement category, age, Charlson index, admission lactate dehydrogenase and lymphocytes predicted death with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.898. Conclusion: In conclusion, CKD and AKI were common in pre-vaccination waves among hospitalized COVID-19 patients and were independent risk factors for death, even when AKI was mild to moderate, and despite improvements in treatment.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The choice of renal replacement therapy (RRT) is an important decision that determines the quality of life and survival. Most patients change from one RRT modality to another to adapt RRT to clinical and psychosocial needs. This has been called «integrated model of RRT¼ that implies new questions about the best sequence of techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study describes the impact of transitions between RRT modalities on survival using the Madrid Registry of Renal Patients (2008-2018). This study used the proportional hazards models and competitive risk models to perform an intention-to-treat (ITT), according to their 1st RRT modality and as-treated (AT) analysis, that consider also their 1st transition. RESULTS: A total of 8971 patients started RRT during this period in Madrid (6.6 Million population): 7207 (80.3%) on hemodialysis (HD), 1401 (15.6%) on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 363 (4.2%) received a pre-emptive kidney transplantation (KT). Incident HD-patients were older (HD group 65.3 years (SD 15.3) vs PD group 58.1 years (SD 14.8) vs KTX group 52 years (SD 17.2); p < 0.001) and had more comorbidities. They presented higher mortality (HD group 40.9% vs PD group 22.8% vs KTX group 8.3%, p < 0.001) and less access to a transplant (HD group 30.4% vs PD group 51.6%; p < 0.001). Transitions between dialysis techniques define different groups of patients with different clinical outcomes. Those who change from HD to PD do it earlier (HD â†’ PD: 0.7 years (SD 1.1) vs PD â†’ HD: 1.5 years (SD 1.4) p < 0.001), are younger (HD â†’ PD: 53.5 years (SD 16.7) vs PD â†’ HD: 61.6 years (SD 14.6); p < 0.001), presented less mortality (HD â†’ PD: 24.5% vs PD â†’ HD: 32.0%; p < 0.001) and higher access to a transplant (HD â†’ PD: 49.4% vs PD â†’ HD: 31.7%; p < 0.001). Survival analysis by competitive risks is essential for integrated RRT models, especially in groups such as PD patients, where 51.6% of the patients were considered as lost follow-up (received a KTX after during the first 2.5 years on PD). In this analysis, survival of patients who change from one technique to another, is more similar to the destination modality than the origin one. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that transitions between RRT-techniques describes different patients, who associate different risks, and could be analyzed in an integrated manner to define improvement actions. This approach should be incorporated into the analysis and reports of renal registries.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Correct identification of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients is crucial to implement therapeutic interventions that may prevent disease progression. Methods: We compared the real prevalence of DKD in T2DM patients according to actual serum and urine laboratory data with the presence of the diagnostic terms DKD and/or CKD on the electronic medical records (EMRs) using a natural language processing tool (SAVANA Manager). All patients ˃18 years of age and diagnosed with T2DM were selected. DKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or a urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (UACR) >30 mg/g or a urinary protein:creatinine ratio (UPCR) >0.3 g/g after excluding acute kidney injury. Results: A total of 15 304 T2DM patients identified on EMRs were eligible to enter the study. A total of 4526 (29.6%) T2DM patients had DKD according to lab criteria. However, the terms CKD or DKD were only present in 33.1% and 7.5%, representing a hidden prevalence of CKD and DKD of 66.9% and 92.5%, respectively. Less severe kidney disease (lower UACR or UPCR, higher eGFR values), female sex and lack of insulin prescription were associated with the absence of DKD or CKD terms in the EMRs (P < .001). Conclusions: The prevalence of DKD among T2DM patients defined by lab data is significantly higher than that reported on hospital EMRs. This could imply underdiagnosis of DKD, especially in patients with the least severe disease who may benefit the most from optimized therapy.

RESUMEN

Introducción y objetivos : La elección del tratamiento sustitutivo renal (TSR) es una decisión importante que determina la calidad de vida y la supervivencia. La mayoría de los pacientes cambiará de una modalidad de TSR a otra para adaptarla a sus necesidades dentro de lo que se conoce como modelo de TSR integrado. En estas circunstancias surgen nuevas preguntas sobre la mejor secuencia de técnicas o las consecuencias de las transiciones.Material y métodosDescribimos las transiciones entre técnicas de TSR y su impacto en la supervivencia a partir del Registro Madrileño de Enfermos Renales (REMER), durante un periodo de 11 años. Se utilizaron los modelos de riesgos proporcionales y de riesgos competitivos para realizar un análisis por intención de tratar (ITT) según su 1.er tratamiento y como tratado (AT) considerando la 1.ª transición.ResultadosUn total de 8.971 pacientes iniciaron su primer TSR durante este periodo en Madrid (6,6 millones habitantes): 7.207 (80,3%) en hemodiálisis (HD), 1.401 (15,6%) en diálisis peritoneal (DP) y 363 (4,1%) recibieron un trasplante renal anticipado (TXR). En el análisis ITT, los pacientes incidentes en HD eran mayores (HD 65,3 años (DE 15,3) vs. DP 58,1 años [DE 14,8] vs. TXR 52,0 años (DE 17,2); p<0,001) y tenían más comorbilidades. Presentaron mayor mortalidad (HD 40,9% vs. DP 22,8% vs. TXR 8,3%, p<0,001) y menor acceso a trasplante (HD 30,4% vs. DP 51,6%; p<0,001). Las transiciones entre las técnicas de diálisis identifican diferentes fenotipos de pacientes con diferentes resultados clínicos en el análisis AT. Los pacientes que cambiaban de HD a DP lo hacían más precozmente (HD→DP: 0,7 años (DE 1,1) vs. DP→HD: 1,5 años [(DE 1,4); p<0,001), eran más jóvenes (HD→DP: 53,5 años (DE 16,7) vs. DP→HD: 61,6 años, (DE 14,6) p<0,001), sufrían menor mortalidad (HD→DP: 24,5% vs. DP→HD: 32%, p<0,001) y tenían mayor acceso al TXR (HD→DP: 49,4% vs. DP→HD: 31,7%, p<0,001). ... (AU)

Introduction and objectives : The choice of renal replacement therapy (RRT) is an important decision that determines the quality of life and survival. Most patients change from one RRT modality to another to adapt RRT to clinical and psychosocial needs. This has been called «integrated model of RRT» that implies new questions about the best sequence of techniques.Material and methodsThe study describes the impact of transitions between RRT modalities on survival using the Madrid Registry of Renal Patients (2008–2018). This study used the proportional hazards models and competitive risk models to perform an intention-to-treat (ITT), according to their 1st RRT modality and as-treated (AT) analysis, that consider also their 1st transition.ResultsA total of 8971 patients started RRT during this period in Madrid (6.6 Million population): 7207 (80.3%) on hemodialysis (HD), 1401 (15.6%) on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 363 (4.2%) received a pre-emptive kidney transplantation (KTX). Incident HD-patients were older (HD group 65.3 years (SD 15.3) vs PD group 58.1 years (SD 14.8) vs KTX group 52 years (SD 17.2); p<0.001) and had more comorbidities. They presented higher mortality (HD group 40.9% vs PD group 22.8% vs 8.3% KTX group, p<0.001) and less access to a transplant (HD group 30.4% vs DP group 51.6%; p<0.001). Transitions between dialysis techniques define different groups of patients with different clinical outcomes. Those who change from HD to PD do it earlier (HD→PD: 0.7 years (SD 1.1) vs PD→HD: 1.5 years (SD 1.4) p<0.001), are younger (HD→PD: 53.5 years (SD 16.7) vs PD→HD: 61.6 years (SD 14.6); p<0.001), presented less mortality (HD→PD: 24.5% vs PD→HD: 32.0%; p<0.001) and higher access to a transplant (HD→PD: 49.4% vs PD→HD: 31.7%; p<0.001). ... (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: A randomized controlled trial demonstrated a beneficial effect of corticosteroids (CS) + cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine in progressive immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN). Although treatment with CS and mycophenolic acid analogues (MPAAs) remains controversial in IgAN, there is no information about their effects in progressive IgAN. Methods: Patients with progressive IgAN, defined by a decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of at least 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the 12 months prior to the start of treatment, proteinuria ≥0.75 g/24 h despite maximum tolerated doses of renin-angiotensin system blockers, and persistent haematuria who had received treatment with CS + MPAA were included in this retrospective study. The main outcome was the difference between the eGFR slope from the start of treatment with CS + MPAA to the last visit with this treatment with respect to the eGFR slope during the 12 months prior to the start of treatment. Results: A total of 25 patients were included in the study. The mean duration of CS + MPAA treatment was 24.7 ± 15.2 months. In the 12 months prior to treatment the median rate of kidney function decline was 23 mL/min/1.73 m2/year [interquartile range (IQR) -32 to -16]. After the onset of treatment, the median eGFR slope was 5 mL/min/1.73 m2/year (IQR 3-9; P = 0.001 with respect to the 12 months prior to treatment). Proteinuria decreased from 1.8 g/day (IQR 1.0-2.5) at baseline to 0.6 g/day (IQR 0.3-1.2) at the end of treatment (P = 0.01) and haematuria disappeared in 40% of patients. There were no serious adverse effects requiring treatment discontinuation. Conclusions: CS + MPAA is an effective treatment in IgAN patients with a sustained decline in kidney function accompanied by persistent proteinuria and haematuria despite optimized conservative treatment. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cytokine storm control is the main target for improving severe COVID-19 by using immunosuppressive treatment. Effective renal replacement therapy (RRT) could give us an advantage removing cytokines in patients with RRT requirements superimposed on COVID-19. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study in COVID-19 patients who required hemodialysis (HD). Patients were assigned to online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) and expanded HD (HDx) according to Brescia group recommendations. We measured several cytokines, ß2 microglobulin and albumin levels pre/post-dialysis and on 1st-2nd week. We compared levels among both techniques and control group (HD without COVID-19). RESULTS: We included 26 patients: 18 with COVID-19 on RRT (5 of them had acute kidney injury [AKI]) and 8 controls. We confirm higher cytokine levels in COVID-19 patients than controls and even higher in patients with AKI than in those with chronic kidney disease. Most cytokines raised during HD session, except IL-10 and TNFα. IL-10 was eliminated by any dialysis technique, while clearance of TNFα was higher in the HDx group. HDx achieved a deeper normalization of cytokines and ß2 microglobulin reduction. Mortality was higher in the OL-HDF group than the HDx group. DISCUSSION: Not all cytokines behave equally along HD session. The following characteristics should be taken into account, such as intrinsic kinetic profile during a HD session. HDx seems to get better performance, probably due to the combination of different factors; however, we did not reach statistical significance due to the small sample size, dropout, and reduction of AKI incidence during the 2nd pandemic wave. CONCLUSION: HDx appears to provide better clearance for TNFα and ß2 microglobulin during HD session and associates lower mortality. We propose the HDx technique for COVID-19 patients with RRT requirements since it seems to be safe and more effective than OL-HDF. Further studies are still needed, but we hope that our preliminary data may help us in future pandemic waves of SARS-CoV-2 or other viruses still to come.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Escenario: La prevalencia de enfermedad renal crónica (ERC) aumenta en población mayor de 65años y asocia morbilidad, dependencia y fragilidad. La diálisis peritoneal (DP) se ha considerado una técnica de paciente joven y vida activa. Hipótesis: La DP puede ser adecuada en pacientes de edad avanzada. Buscamos resultados desfavorables que contravengan esta hipótesis. Objetivo: Describir el tratamiento con DP en mayores de 65años, evaluar su evolución clínica comparada con los menores de 65 e identificar áreas de mejora asistencial. Estudio: Prospectivo, observacional y multicéntrico en incidentes en DP, seguimiento hasta evento o fin del estudio (ene-2003 a ene-2018).Resultados: Se incluyen 2.435 pacientes; el 31,9% (777) eran mayores de 65 años. El tiempo medio de seguimiento fue de 2,1años para ambos grupos. El grupo de edad avanzada era 25años mayor, con más comorbilidad: diabetes (29,5% vs. 17,2%; p<0,001), evento CV previo (34,5% vs. 14,0%; p<0,001) e índice de Charlson sin edad (3,8 vs. 3,0; p<0,001). No encontramos diferencias en cumplimiento de objetivos intermedios de eficacia de DP, control de anemia o hipertensión durante el seguimiento. La tasa de peritonitis fue mayor en la cohorte mayor de 65años (0,65 vs. 0,45 episodios/paciente-año; p<0,001), aunque la distribución gérmenes, tasa de ingreso y evolución final fue similar en ambos grupos. Lógicamente, registramos mayor mortalidad en el grupo mayor de 65años (28,4% vs. 9,4%), aunque el tiempo de permanencia en DP fue similar (2,1años). La principal causa de salida fue el trasplante renal en jóvenes (48,3%), mientras que en los pacientes de mayor edad fue el paso a hemodiálisis, principalmente por cansancio de cuidador/autocuidado (20,2%) y no por fallo de la técnica (7,3%). (AU)

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing in patients older than 65years and is related to morbidity, frailty, and dependence. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has classically been associated with young patients with an active life. Hypothesis: PD should be offered to patients over 65years. We search for any unfavorable results that may advice not to recommend PD therapy for this group. Objective: To describe PD treatment and outcomes in patients >65years, to compare their results with patients <65years and to identify areas with room for improvement in a real-life study. Study: Prospective, observational, and multicenter study performed in incident PD patients, from January 2003 until January 2018. Results: We included 2,435 PD patients, 31.9% were older than 65years; there was a difference of 25years between both groups. Median follow up was 2.1years. Older than 65years group had more comorbidity: Diabetes (29.5% vs 17.2%; p<0.001), previous CV events 34.5% vs 14.0%; p<0.001), Charlson index (3.8 vs 3.0; p<0.001). We did not find differences in efficacy and PD adequacy objectives fulfillment, anaemia management or blood pressure during follow-up. Peritonitis rate was higher in older 65years group (0.65 vs 0.45 episodes/patient/year; p<0.001), but there was not differences in germs, admission rate and follow up. Mortality was higher in older 65years group (28.4% vs 9.4%) as expected. PD permanence probability was similar (2.1years). The main cause of PD withdrawal was transplant in group <65years (48.3%) and transfer to HD in group >65years. The main reason was caregiver or patient fatigue (20.2%), and not technique failure (7.3%). (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The choice of renal replacement therapy (RRT) is an important decision that determines the quality of life and survival. Most patients change from one RRT modality to another to adapt RRT to clinical and psychosocial needs. This has been called «integrated model of RRT¼ that implies new questions about the best sequence of techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study describes the impact of transitions between RRT modalities on survival using the Madrid Registry of Renal Patients (2008-2018). This study used the proportional hazards models and competitive risk models to perform an intention-to-treat (ITT), according to their 1st RRT modality and as-treated (AT) analysis, that consider also their 1st transition. RESULTS: A total of 8971 patients started RRT during this period in Madrid (6.6 Million population): 7207 (80.3%) on hemodialysis (HD), 1401 (15.6%) on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 363 (4.2%) received a pre-emptive kidney transplantation (KTX). Incident HD-patients were older (HD group 65.3 years (SD 15.3) vs PD group 58.1 years (SD 14.8) vs KTX group 52 years (SD 17.2); p<0.001) and had more comorbidities. They presented higher mortality (HD group 40.9% vs PD group 22.8% vs 8.3% KTX group, p<0.001) and less access to a transplant (HD group 30.4% vs DP group 51.6%; p<0.001). Transitions between dialysis techniques define different groups of patients with different clinical outcomes. Those who change from HD to PD do it earlier (HD→PD: 0.7 years (SD 1.1) vs PD→HD: 1.5 years (SD 1.4) p<0.001), are younger (HD→PD: 53.5 years (SD 16.7) vs PD→HD: 61.6 years (SD 14.6); p<0.001), presented less mortality (HD→PD: 24.5% vs PD→HD: 32.0%; p<0.001) and higher access to a transplant (HD→PD: 49.4% vs PD→HD: 31.7%; p<0.001). Survival analysis by competitive risks is essential for integrated RRT models, especially in groups such as PD patients, where 51.6% of the patients were considered as lost follow-up (received a KTX after during the first 2.5 years on PD). In this analysis, survival of patients who change from one technique to another, is more similar to the destination modality than the origin one. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that transitions between RRT-techniques describes different patients, who associate different risks, and could be analyzed in an integrated manner to define improvement actions. This approach should be incorporated into the analysis and reports of renal registries.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients on haemodialysis (HD) have high mortality. We investigated the value of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the dynamic changes of antibodies (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay immunoglobulin M (IgM) + IgA and/or IgG) in a large HD cohort. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study in 10 Madrid HD centres. Infection rate, anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody dynamics and the incidence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (defined by positive RT-PCR, IgM + IgA and/or IgG) were assessed. RESULTS: From 1 March to 15 April 2020, 136 of 808 (16.8%) HD patients were diagnosed with symptomatic COVID-19 by RT-PCR of nasopharyngeal swabs and 42/136 (31%) died. In the second fortnight of April, RT-PCR and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were assessed in 763 of the surviving patients. At this point, 69/91 (75.8%) symptomatic COVID-19 patients had anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Four weeks later, 15.4% (10/65) of initially antibody-positive patients had become negative. Among patients without prior symptomatic COVID-19, 9/672 (1.3%) were RT-PCR positive and 101/672 patients (15.0%) were antibody positive. Four weeks later, 62/86 (72.1%) of initially antibody-positive patients had become negative. Considering only IgG titres, serology remained positive after 4 weeks in 90% (54/60) of patients with symptomatic COVID-19 and in 52.5% (21/40) of asymptomatic patients. The probability of an adequate serologic response (defined as the development of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies that persisted at 4 weeks) was higher in patients who had symptomatic COVID-19 than in asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection {odds ratio [OR) 4.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.04-7.99]} corrected for age, Charlson comorbidity index score and time on HD. Living in a nursing home [OR 5.9 (95% CI 2.3-15.1)] was the main risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSIONS: The anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody immune response in HD patients depends on clinical presentation. The antibody titres decay earlier than previously reported for the general population. This inadequate immune response raises questions about the efficacy of future vaccines.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing in patients older than 65 years and is related to morbidity, frailty, and dependence. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has classically been associated with young patients with an active life. HYPOTHESIS: PD should be offered to patients over 65 years. We search for any unfavorable results that may advice not to recommend PD therapy for this group. OBJECTIVE: To describe PD treatment and outcomes in patients > 65 years, to compare their results with patients < 65 years and to identify areas with room for improvement in a real-life study. STUDY: Prospective, observational, and multicenter study performed in incident PD patients, from January 2003 until January 2018. RESULTS: We included 2,435 PD patients, 31.9% were older than 65 years; there was a difference of 25 years between both groups. Median follow up was 2.1 years. Older than 65 years group had more comorbidity: Diabetes (29.5% vs 17.2%; p < 0.001), previous CV events 34.5% vs 14.0%; p < 0.001), Charlson index (3.8 vs 3.0; p < 0.001). We did not find differences in efficacy and PD adequacy objectives fulfillment, anaemia management or blood pressure during follow-up. Peritonitis rate was higher in older 65 years group (0.65 vs 0.45 episodes/patient/year; p < 0.001), but there was not differences in germs, admission rate and follow up. Mortality was higher in older 65 years group (28.4% vs 9.4%) as expected. PD permanence probability was similar (2.1 years). The main cause of PD withdrawal was transplant in group < 65 years (48.3%) and transfer to HD in group > 65 years. The main reason was caregiver or patient fatigue (20.2%), and not technique failure (7.3%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a relation (HR [95%CI]) between mortality and age > 65 years 2.4 [1.9-3.0]; DM 1.6 [1.3-2.1]; CV events 2.1 [1.7-2.7]. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identify a relation between technique failure and age > 65 years 1.5 [1.3-1.9]; DM 1.6 [1.3-1.9] and previous transplant 1.5 [1.2-2.0]. CONCLUSION: Patients older than 65 years fulfilled PD adequacy criteria during the follow up. We believe PD is a valid option for patients older 65 years. It is necessary to try to prevent infections and patient/caregiver fatigue, to avoid HD transfer for reasons not related to technique failure.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged in Wuhan and rapidly spread, affecting >10 million cases worldwide. Caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and primarily manifesting as an acute respiratory failure with interstitial and alveolar pneumonia, it can also affect multiple organs. Kidney involvement was underestimated in early reports and its role remains controversial. The aim of this study was to analyse the role of kidney damage in COVID-19 outcome. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of 1603 consecutive patients admitted in a University Reference Hospital in the heart of the European outbreak. RESULTS: Median age was 64 years, 40.4% were female, 15.2% presented diabetes mellitus, 35.7% hypertension and 20.3% obesity. On admission, the prevalence of elevated serum creatinine (sCr), proteinuria, leucocyturia and haematuria were 21.0, 37.8, 31.8 and 45.6%, respectively. In total, 43.5% of those with an elevated sCr had previous chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 11.4% of those with normal sCr developed an in-hospital acute kidney injury (AKI); 17 patients needed acute haemodialysis; and 197 patients died during hospitalization. Cox proportional hazard regression confirmed that elevated baseline sCr [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) 2.40 (1.79-3.22)], previous CKD [1.59 (1.06-2.37)], haematuria [1 + 1.68 (0.92-3.06), 2-3 + 2.69 (1.49-4.87)] and in-hospital AKI [1.50 (0.92-2.44)] were independent risk factors for in-hospital death after adjusting for age, sex and comorbidity. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of acute and chronic kidney disease on admission and in-hospital AKI is higher than previously reported in Wuhan, and is associated with high in-hospital mortality. We should increase our awareness towards kidney involvement and design specific strategies for management of COVID-19 in these patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: La enfermedad renal crónica tiene una alta prevalencia y coste, así como un mayor riesgo de ingreso. Disponemos de registros públicos y obligatorios, pero no hay referencias recientes para estimar el impacto que el tratamiento sustitutivo renal (TSR) tiene en la actividad hospitalaria. MÉTODOS: Tras las autorizaciones pertinentes, hemos integrado las bases de datos REMER (2013-2014) y CMBDH (2013-2015) para analizar la actividad hospitalaria durante el primer año de TSR. RESULTADOS: Un total de 767 pacientes iniciaron TSR en los 7 hospitales de tercer nivel de la Comunidad de Madrid. Más de una tercera parte lo hicieron de forma no programada durante un ingreso. Este inicio es más frecuente en HD que en DP, pero existen diferencias clínicas relevantes en edad y en comorbilidad. Descartando este primer episodio, casi el 60% de pacientes ingresan durante el primer año. La tasa de ingreso es de 1,2 ingresos/paciente, más alta en HD que en TX y DP; la estancia media es de 8,6días. El coste agregado de los ingresos del primer año es de 12.006 €/paciente. Nuestro análisis asegura la inclusión exhaustiva de todos los episodios y la estimación precisa de costes. CONCLUSIONES: El impacto del TSR en la actividad hospitalaria ha sido infraestimado y es una parte importante del coste global del TSR. Los resultados de la literatura internacional no pueden extrapolarse a nuestro país por las diferencias en el modelo sanitario y perfil de paciente. La integración de bases de datos clínicas es técnicamente viable y podría abrir una vía inmensa de información que solo requiere apoyo institucional para su desarrollo

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic kidney disease has a high prevalence and economic impact, and an increased risk of hospitalization. Although there are public regional and country registries, we have not found references to estimate the impact of renal replacement therapy (RRT) on hospital admissions. METHODS: We obtained authorization from the ethics committee and health authorities to integrate the REMER [Madrid Kidney Disease Registry] (2013-2014) and Minimum Basic Data Set (2013-2015) databases and to analyze the admissions during the first year of RRT. RESULTS: 767 patients started RRT in all the hospitals of our region across all RRT modalities. More than a third of the patients start dialysis during a hospital admission. This unplanned start, more common in HD than PD, shows relevant differences in patient profile or admission characteristics. Without considering this initial episode, almost 60% of patients were admitted during their first year. The hospitalization rate was 1.2 admissions/patient, higher in HD than in TX or PD; the mean length of stay was 8.6 days. The estimated cost of admissions during the first year is €12,006/patient. Our analysis ensures the exhaustive inclusion of all episodes and accurate estimation based on the discharge form. CONCLUSION: The impact of RRT on hospitals has been underestimated and is very relevant when calculating the total cost of RRT. Results from other countries cannot be extrapolated due to differences in the health system and patient profile. The integration of clinical databases could open up an opportunity that needs only institutional support for its development

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Spain has dramatically increased the number of controlled circulatory death donors (cDCD). The initial selection criteria for considering cDCD for kidney transplantation (KT) have been expanded progressively, with practically no limits in donor age during the last years. We aimed to analyze the early clinical outcomes using expanded (> 65 years) cDCD in comparison with standard ones. METHODS: Observational multicenter study including 19 transplant centers in Spain. We performed a systematic inclusion in a central database of every KT from expanded cDCD at each participant unit from January-2012 to January-2017. Surgical procedures and immunosuppressive protocols were based on local practices. Data was analyzed in the central office using logistic and Cox regression or competitive-risk models for multivariate analysis. Median time of follow-up was 18.1 months. RESULTS: 561 KT were performed with kidneys from cDCD, 135 from donors older than 65 years. As expected, recipients from older cDCD were also older (65.8 (SD 8.8) vs 53.7 (SD 11.4) years; p < 0.001) and with higher comorbidity. At 1 year, no differences were found amongst older and younger cDCD KT recipients in terms of serum creatinine (1.6 (SD 0.7) vs 1.5 (SD 0.8) mg/dl; p = 0.29). Non-death censored graft survival was inferior, but death-censored graft survival was not different (95.5 vs 98.2% respectively; p = 0.481). They also presented a trend towards higher delayed graft function (55.4 vs 46.7%; p = 0.09) but a similar rate of primary non-function (3.7 vs 3.1%; p = 0.71), and acute rejection (3.0 vs 6.3%; p = 0.135). In the multivariate analysis, in short follow-up, donor age was not related with worse survival or poor kidney function (eGFR < 30 ml/min). CONCLUSIONS: The use of kidneys from expanded cDCD is increasing for older and comorbid patients. Short-term graft outcomes are similar for expanded and standard cDCD, so they constitute a good-enough source of kidneys to improve the options of KT wait-listed patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic kidney disease has a high prevalence and economic impact, and an increased risk of hospitalization. Although there are public regional and country registries, we have not found references to estimate the impact of renal replacement therapy (RRT) on hospital admissions. METHODS: We obtained authorization from the ethics committee and health authorities to integrate the REMER [Madrid Kidney Disease Registry] (2013-2014) and Minimum Basic Data Set (2013-2015) databases and to analyze the admissions during the first year of RRT. RESULTS: 767 patients started RRT in all the hospitals of our region across all RRT modalities. More than a third of the patients start dialysis during a hospital admission. This unplanned start, more common in HD than PD, shows relevant differences in patient profile or admission characteristics. Without considering this initial episode, almost 60% of patients were admitted during their first year. The hospitalization rate was 1.2admissions/patient, higher in HD than in TX or PD; the mean length of stay was 8.6days. The estimated cost of admissions during the first year is €12,006/patient. Our analysis ensures the exhaustive inclusion of all episodes and accurate estimation based on the discharge form. CONCLUSION: The impact of RRT on hospitals has been underestimated and is very relevant when calculating the total cost of RRT. Results from other countries cannot be extrapolated due to differences in the health system and patient profile. The integration of clinical databases could open up an opportunity that needs only institutional support for its development.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introducción: Varios países eu:ropeos disponen de programas de donación tras parada cardiaca controlada (cDCD). Veintidós centros participan en el grupo GEODAS, cuyos resultados clínicos presentamos desde una perspectiva nefrológica. Métodos: Estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo observacional con inclusión sistemática de todos los trasplantes renales (TR) procedentes de cDCD, siguiendo protocolos locales de extracción e inmunosupresión. Resultados: Se incluyó a 335 donantes tras cDCD (edad media 57,2 años) fallecidos mayoritariamente por eventos cardiovasculares. Se analizan 566 receptores (edad media de 56,5 años; el 91,9% con primer trasplante renal), con una mediana de seguimiento de 1,9 años. La terapia de inducción fue casi universal (timoglobulina 67,4%; simulect 32,8%) con mantenimiento con prednisona-MMF-tacrolimus (91,3%) o combinaciones con mTOR (6,5%). El tiempo medio de isquemia fría (CIT) fue 12,3 h. Hubo un 3,4% de fallo primario del injerto (n = 19), asociado fundamentalmente al tiempo de isquemia fría (solo el CIT ≥ 14 h se asoció a fallo primario del injerto). La función retrasada del injerto (DGF) fue 48,8%. Los factores de riesgo para la DGF fueron: CIT ≥ 14 h OR 1,6, procedencia de hemodiálisis (vs. diálisis peritoneal) OR 2,1 y edad del donante OR 1,01 (por año). Veintiún pacientes fallecieron con injerto funcionante (3,7%), con una supervivencia de paciente e injerto (censurada para muerte) al segundo año del 95% y del 95,1%, respectivamente. El filtrado glomerular estimado al año de seguimiento fue 60,9ml/min. Conclusiones: El CIT es un factor modificable para mejorar la incidencia del fallo primario del injerto en trasplante renal procedente de cDCD. El trasplante renal con cDCD tiene mayor incidencia en la función retrasada del injerto, pero igual supervivencia de paciente e injerto que la referencia histórica para donación en muerte encefálica. Los resultados son satisfactorios para continuar promoviendo este tipo de donación. Conclusiones: El CIT es un factor modificable para mejorar la incidencia del fallo primario del injerto en trasplante renal procedente de cDCD. El trasplante renal con cDCD tiene mayor incidencia en la función retrasada del injerto, pero igual supervivencia de paciente e injerto que la referencia histórica para donación en muerte encefálica. Los resultados son satisfactorios para continuar promoviendo este tipo de donación

Introduction: Many European countries have transplant programmes with controlled donors after cardiac death (cDCD). Twenty-two centres are part of GEODAS group. We analysed clinical results from a nephrological perspective. Methods: Observational, retrospective and multicentre study with systematic inclusion of all kidney transplant recipients from cDCD, following local protocols regarding extraction and immunosuppression. Results: A total of 335 cDCD donors (mean age 57.2 years) whose deaths were mainly due to cardiovascular events were included. Finally, 566 recipients (mean age 56.5 years; 91.9% first kidney transplant) were analysed with a median of follow-up of 1.9 years. Induction therapy was almost universal (thymoglobulin 67.4%; simulect 32.8%) with maintenance with prednisone-MMF-tacrolimus (91.3%) or combinations with mTOR (6.5%). Mean cold ischaemia time (CIT) was 12.3 h. Approximately 3.4% (n = 19) of recipients experienced primary non-function, essentially associated with CIT (only CIT ≥ 14 h was associated with primary non-function). Delayed graft function (DGF) was 48.8%. DGF risk factors were CIT ≥ 14 h OR 1.6, previous haemodialysis (vs. peritoneal dialysis) OR 2.1 and donor age OR 1.01 (per year). Twenty-one patients (3.7%) died with a functioning graft, with a recipient and death-censored graft survival at 2-years of 95% and 95.1%, respectively. The estimated glomerular filtration rate at one year of follow-up was 60.9 ml/min. Conclusions: CIT is a modifiable factor for improving the incidence of primary non-function in kidney transplant arising from cDCD. cDCD kidney transplant recipients have higher delayed graft function rate, but the same patient and graft survival compared to brain-dead donation in historical references. These results are convincing enough to continue fostering this type of donation

Asunto(s)