RESUMEN
Describe cultural beliefs related to diabetes in Minnesota Somali children with type 1 diabetes (T1D), and compare their diabetes control to that of non-Somali children with diabetes. A cross-sectional study involving Somali children ≤ 19 years with T1D at the University of Minnesota Masonic Children's Hospital and Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota. A survey was administered to parents of all participants and to children aged ≥ 12 years. Data were collected by history and from the medical record. Twenty-five Somali children participated, with 24 parent-child pairs (2 siblings). Mean participant age was 12.2 ± 5.2 (36% female). Seventy-one percent of parents indicated the child was "the same as before" other than having to do diabetes cares. Families were coping well, and the child was not treated differently than siblings. Performance of routine cares was described as the hardest part about having diabetes, but this was not related to traditional culture or religion. One notable exception was difficulty performing carbohydrate counting on Somali foods. Respondents were appreciative of the education provided by the diabetes team. Less than 10% used herbal supplements in addition to insulin. Mean HbA1c in Somali children was higher than the overall pediatric clinic average, 9.5 ± 1.6 % versus 8.8 ± 1.6 (p = 0.01). The difference was largely due to adolescent patients. The majority of Somali families cope well with diabetes and have a positive attitude towards the diabetes education. Glycemic control in adolescents is worse than in non-Somali peers. There is a need for culture-specific dietary instruction materials.
Asunto(s)
Cultura , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/etnología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/psicología , Familia/etnología , Familia/psicología , Adaptación Psicológica , Adolescente , Niño , Ciudades , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Minnesota/epidemiología , Somalia/etnologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetes results from autoimmune destruction of pancreatic ß cells. Findings from preclinical studies suggest that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and proton-pump inhibitors might enhance ß-cell survival and regeneration. We postulated that sitagliptin and lansoprazole would preserve ß-cell function in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes. METHODS: We did a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial (REPAIR-T1D). Participants aged 11-36 years, diagnosed with type 1 diabetes within the past 6 months were recruited from Sanford Health Systems (Sioux Falls, SD, USA; Fargo, ND, USA), Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota (St Paul, MN, USA), and Rady Children's Hospital (San Diego, CA, USA). Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive oral sitagliptin (100 mg for participants ≥18 years, 50 mg for those <18 years) and lansoprazole (60 mg for participants ≥18 years, 30 mg for those <18 years) or matched placebo for 12 months. Randomisation was done by a blocked randomisation process (blocks of three and six), with separate streams for younger (<18 years) and older (≥18 years) participants, and males and females. All participants and personnel remained masked until after the completion of the final 12 month visit, at which time data were unmasked to the analysis team. The primary endpoint was C-peptide response to a mixed meal challenge at 12 months measured as 2 h area under curve. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01155284. FINDINGS: Between Sept 21, 2010, and May 29, 2012, 46 participants were randomly assigned to the treatment group and 22 to the placebo group; of whom 40 participants in the treatment group and 18 in the placebo group completed the 12-month treatment. At 12 months, the mean change in C-peptide area under curve was -229 pmol/L (95% CI -316 to -142) for the treatment group and -253 pmol/L (-383 to -123) for the placebo group; this difference was not significant (p=0·77). No adverse or serious adverse events were probably or definitely related to the study treatment. INTERPRETATION: Although the expected change in the primary endpoint was not achieved, not all participants had increases in glucagon-like peptide-1 and gastrin concentrations that were expected with treatment. Although participants did not have adverse events related to study drugs, the study is not powered to address safety definitively. Further trials including these drugs might be warranted, but should be designed to ensure appropriate selection of participants and increases in these intermediary hormones. FUNDING: Sanford Research and JDRF.