RESUMEN

Tamoxifen, a pivotal therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, is known for its efficacy in reducing breast cancer recurrence and mortality. However, concerns about potential ocular complications, particularly maculopathy, have emerged. This study aims to investigate the risk and associated factors of diverse macular conditions in tamoxifen users, considering drug exposure, demographics, and systemic diseases. A nationwide cohort of tamoxifen users, comprised of 14,267 tamoxifen users, was analyzed using the health insurance review and assessment database in South Korea. Demographic and clinical characteristics were examined, and the cumulative incidence of macular diseases was stratified by age and cumulative tamoxifen dosage. We conducted logistic regression analysis to identify potential risk factors among clinical variables such as age, sex, indications for tamoxifen use, and systemic diseases associated with various macular conditions. Additionally, Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the baseline clinical characteristics predictive of these macular conditions, with subsequent calculation of hazard ratios. Cumulative incidences of overall macular diseases, other maculopathy excluding common macular diseases, and macular edema were 26.4, 11.4, and 6.5%, respectively. The incidence of various macular conditions increased with age and the cumulative tamoxifen dose. Age, cumulative dose group, and liver diseases demonstrated significant associations with overall macular diseases and maculopathy excluding common macular diseases in multivariate logistic regression analyses (all P < 0.05). Furthermore, age emerged as significant predictive factors of maculopathy in Cox proportional hazard models. Tamoxifen-induced maculopathy poses a concern for prescribing physicians and ophthalmologists, and this study provides valuable insights into its risk and risk factors. This study may contribute to evidence-based guidelines for tamoxifen maculopathy screening, emphasizing the importance of considering age, cumulative dose, and liver diseases for recommendation on screening timing and frequency.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background/Objective: Hydroxychloroquine retinopathy, traditionally characterized by parafoveal or pericentral outer retinal damage, is explored for atypical presentations in Asian patients. This challenges conventional beliefs regarding onset, retinopathy pattern, and associated visual field defects. Methods: Ninety-five patients diagnosed with hydroxychloroquine retinopathy at Hanyang University Hospital underwent screening from January 2010 to December 2023. Swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), ultra-widefield fundus autofluorescence (UWF-FAF), and automated visual fields (VF) were employed for detailed structural and functional evaluations. Multifocal electroretinography was performed in selected cases requiring additional objective evidence of retinal toxicity. Results: Among 95 patients, 14 (14.7%) exhibited atypical presentations, including very early onset (n = 1), (far) peripheral-dominant damages (n = 4), perivascular involvement (n = 1), bitemporal hemianopsia due to nasal extensive lesions (n = 1), unilateral involvement (n = 2), and asymmetric involvement in retinopathy pattern or severity between the eyes (n = 7). These findings underscore the importance of utilizing expanded imaging techniques, such as ultra-widefield FAF imaging, to identify atypical presentations of retinal involvement. Conclusions: Screening physicians should consider these atypical presentations to ensure timely diagnosis and appropriate management in patients undergoing hydroxychloroquine treatment.

RESUMEN

In this population-based cohort study, we investigated screening practices for maculopathy and incidences of specific macular/retinal conditions in pentosan polysulfate (PPS) users and assessed the relationship between these outcomes and drug exposure levels. Using a health claims database that covers approximately 50 million Koreans, we identified 138,593 individuals who were prescribed PPS between 2010 and 2021. For the 133,762 PPS users who initiated therapy between 2012 and 2021, the cumulative PPS dose for each participant was evaluated, and based on their cumulative PPS dose, patients were categorized into the high-risk (≥ 500 g), low-risk (50-500 g), and minimal exposure (< 50 g) groups. We analyzed the performance and methods of these examination methods used between 2018 and 2021 and compared them among cumulative dose groups to determine whether high-risk users underwent maculopathy screening more frequently or appropriately. We assessed the cumulative incidence of overall macular degeneration and maculopathy excluding common macular diseases following PPS therapy initiation. Most PPS users (99.7%) received a cumulative PPS dose < 500 g and the high- and low-risk groups comprised 445 (0.3%) and 22,185 (16.6%) patients, respectively. During the study period, monitoring examinations were conducted in 52.6% and 49.4% of high- and low-risk patients, respectively, revealing no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.156). No significant differences were observed in the annual percentages of patients receiving ophthalmic examinations between the high- and low-risk groups (all P > 0.05). The cumulative incidences of overall macular degeneration and maculopathy excluding common macular diseases in high-risk users were 19.3% and 9.0%, respectively, which were significantly different from those of low-risk users (both P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed significantly higher risks of maculopathy excluding common macular diseases in the low- (Hazard ratio [HR] of 1.55 [95% CI 1.13-2.12]) and high-risk groups (HR of 1.66 [95% CI 1.22-2.27]) compared to the minimal exposure group. Our findings suggest a need for increased emphasis on PPS maculopathy screening in high-risk patients, highlighting raising awareness regarding exposure-dependent risks and the establishment of screening guidelines.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

(1) Background/Objectives: To investigate the nationwide screening practices and trends in tamoxifen retinal toxicity (tamoxifen retinopathy) in South Korea using national health insurance claims data. (2) Methods: A total of 43,848 patients who started tamoxifen therapy between 2015 and 2020 and had no prior ophthalmic diseases or other conditions requiring screening for retinopathy were included. The annual numbers of tamoxifen users and new initiators of tamoxifen therapy were assessed. The screening examinations were separated into baseline (first ophthalmic examination after tamoxifen administration) and subsequent monitoring examinations. The timing and modalities for the baseline and subsequent monitoring examinations performed between 2015 and 2021 were assessed in tamoxifen users. (3) Results: The annual number of tamoxifen users increased over the study period from 54,056 in 2015 to 81,720 in 2021. The number of patients who underwent ophthalmic examination after tamoxifen administration was 8961 (20.4%). Baseline screening was performed in 6.5% of patients within 1 year of use, and subsequent monitoring was performed in 27.8% of patients who underwent baseline screening. Funduscopy or fundus photography was performed most commonly for baseline screening and subsequent monitoring (99.0% and 98.6%, respectively), while optical coherence tomography was performed only in 21.9% and 29.6% of baseline and monitoring examinations, respectively. The average number of monitoring examinations per year was 0.68 ± 0.45. Although the annual percentage of patients receiving a baseline examination within 1 year gradually increased over time, the percentage of those with subsequent monitoring performed within 1 year was similar over the study period. (4) Conclusions: Our finding, appropriate screening in a small proportion of patients receiving tamoxifen, suggests the need to promote awareness among healthcare professionals and develop a standardized approach for screening for tamoxifen retinopathy.

RESUMEN

Importance: Understanding the potential risk of uveitis recurrence after COVID-19 vaccination in individuals with a history of uveitis is crucial for vaccination strategies and clinical monitoring. Objective: To investigate the risk of uveitis recurrence after COVID-19 vaccination in a cohort of individuals with a history of uveitis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective population-based cohort study included individuals diagnosed with uveitis between January 1, 2015, and February 25, 2021, in South Korea. After excluding individuals without COVID-19 vaccination or with SARS-CoV-2 infection, individuals with a history of uveitis who had received at least 1 dose of a messenger RNA (BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech] or mRNA-1273 [Moderna]) or adenovirus vector-based (ChAdOx1 [AstraZeneca] or Ad26.COV2.S [Janssen]) COVID-19 vaccine were included. Data were analyzed from February 26, 2021, to December 31, 2022. Exposure: Demographic and clinical data, along with vaccination details, were retrieved from the Korean National Health Insurance Service and Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency databases. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes of interest were incidence and risk of postvaccination uveitis in association with different COVID-19 vaccines and periods before and after COVID-19 vaccination. Uveitis was categorized by onset (early, within 30 days, or delayed) and type (anterior or nonanterior). Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were calculated to evaluate the risk of uveitis following COVID-19 vaccination, stratified according to vaccine type and vaccination period. Results: Of 543 737 individuals with history of uveitis, 473 934 individuals (mean [SD] age, 58.9 [17.4] years; 243 127 [51.3] female) had documented COVID-19 vaccination and were included in analysis. The cumulative incidence of postvaccination uveitis was 8.6% at 3 months, 12.5% at 6 months, and 16.8% at 1 year, predominantly of the anterior type. Variations in the risk of postvaccination uveitis were observed across different vaccines and intervaccination periods. The risk of early postvaccination uveitis was increased for individuals receiving the BNT162b2 (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.52-1.86), mRNA-1273 (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.21-1.89), ChAdOx1 (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.43-1.79), and Ad26.COV2.S (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.40-3.07) vaccines. The risk of uveitis was higher particularly between the first and second vaccination doses (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.55-1.73). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that there was an elevated risk of uveitis following COVID-19 vaccination, with the vaccine type and period mediating this risk. For individuals with a history of uveitis, clinicians should consider the potential risk of uveitis recurrence in vaccination strategies and clinical monitoring.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Anterior uveitis (AU) is a significant concern in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and the choice of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) as a treatment modality raises questions regarding its effects on AU. We compared the effects of TNFi on AU in patients with AS. Methods: Patients diagnosed with AS and treated with at least one TNFi, including anti-TNFα antibodies (adalimumab and infliximab) or a soluble TNF receptor molecule (etanercept), between January 2010 and December 2022, were retrospectively reviewed. We compared the recurrence rate of AU in patients with a history of uveitis and the incidence of new-onset AU in those without a history of uveitis among the three TNFi groups. We also compared the effects of two different TNFi agents in patients who underwent TNFi switching. Results: Within two years of treatment initiation, there was no significant difference in AU recurrence among the three TNFi groups. However, the incidence of new-onset AU was significantly higher in the etanercept group than in the adalimumab group (26.4% vs. 6.3%; p = 0.024). After two years, the AU recurrence rate was significantly lower in the adalimumab group than in the other groups (p < 0.001). Among patients who underwent anti-TNFi switching, adalimumab treatment was associated with a significantly lower incidence of uveitis than etanercept (p = 0.023). Conclusion: In the short-term period following TNFi therapy, etanercept induced new-onset AU more frequently than adalimumab in patients with AS. Adalimumab recipients experienced fewer AU recurrences during the subsequent long-term period compared to other TNFi recipients.

RESUMEN

In this nationwide population-based cohort study, we investigated the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with hydroxychloroquine retinopathy screening using the National Health Insurance Review and Assessment database in South Korea. This study included a total of 32,732 at-risk patients, identified based on having been prescribed hydroxychloroquine for at least 6 months, and 15,477 long-term (> 5 years) users between January 2010 and December 2020. Participants were categorized based on the performance of baseline examinations (within 1 year of hydroxychloroquine use) and monitoring examinations (after 5 years of hydroxychloroquine use). Demographic and clinical factors, including hospitals and medical specialties prescribing hydroxychloroquine, indications for hydroxychloroquine use, and prescription details, were compared between groups. Significant differences were found in sex, residence, departments and hospitals (primary vs. referral centers) where hydroxychloroquine was prescribed, diagnosis for hydroxychloroquine therapy, and mean daily dose between patients who did and did not undergo baseline or monitoring examinations (all P < 0.01). Patients who received hydroxychloroquine prescriptions from referral hospitals were more likely to undergo baseline and monitoring examinations compared to those from primary clinics (both P < 0.001). Additionally, patients who received hydroxychloroquine prescriptions from the rheumatology department and had systemic lupus erythematosus were more likely to undergo baseline and monitoring examinations compared to other patients (all P < 0.001). There were notable differences in the number of modalities used for retinopathy screening between primary and referral centers (P < 0.001). Our findings suggest that several clinical factors related to hydroxychloroquine prescription and screening centers are associated with retinopathy screening practices.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the nationwide use of pentosan polysulfate (PPS) and screening practices for PPS maculopathy (PPM), with a focus on the timing and modalities used. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: For evaluation of nationwide usage, 133 762 individuals who received PPS prescriptions between 2012 and 2021 were included. To investigate practice patterns, 55 487 individuals (referred to as overall users) who initiated PPS therapy between 2018 and 2020 were identified using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment database. After excluding patients with ophthalmic diseases before PPS administration, 34 857 PPS users without prior ophthalmic diseases were identified. METHODS: Ophthalmic examinations performed after initiating PPS therapy were categorized as baseline and subsequent monitoring examinations. The timing and modalities employed for these examinations were analyzed. The annual trends in PPS utilization and maculopathy screening were evaluated by assessing the number of PPS users and determining the proportion of patients receiving retinal/macular examinations among these users. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Performance of baseline and subsequent monitoring examinations and timing and modalities used for screening. RESULTS: The number of PPS users dramatically increased annually over the study period from 5494 in 2012 to 40 451 in 2021. However, the majority of PPS users did not undergo baseline or subsequent monitoring examinations for PPM. Only 27.2% and 12.4% of PPS users without prior ophthalmic disease underwent baseline and monitoring examinations, respectively. Funduscopy/fundus photography was the most commonly utilized, whereas OCT and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) were performed in only 45.2% and 5.3% of the PPS users without prior ophthalmic diseases for monitoring, respectively. The performance of the screening examinations differed significantly across the 3 different daily dose and duration groups (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the lack of performance of baseline and monitoring examinations for maculopathy in most patients taking PPS in South Korea. The limited use of OCT and FAF suggests potential insensitivity in detecting PPM. These findings emphasize the need for improvements in screening practices, including increased awareness and referrals to ophthalmologists, utilization of more sensitive modalities, and regular monitoring to enable early detection of PPM. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of donor age on corneal graft survival following primary penetrating keratoplasty (PK) with imported donor corneas. METHODS: The eyes of patients who underwent primary PK with imported donor corneas were classified retrospectively into two groups according to a donor-age cutoff of 65 years. Primary outcome measures were rejection-free graft survival and graft survival. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to assess the factors affecting graft survival. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, while differences between groups were examined using a log-rank test. A subgroup analysis of low- and high-risk eyes according to preoperative diagnosis was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 140 eyes from 138 patients (age, 58 ± 18 years) were enrolled. Cox regression analysis revealed that the donor age of 65 years or older group presented an increased risk of both graft rejection and failure. Survival analysis revealed that rejection-free graft survival and graft survival rates were higher in eyes in the donor age of less than 65 years group. Finally, in the subgroup analysis, both rejection-free graft survival and graft survival rates were significantly higher in the donor age of less than 65 years group than in the donor age of 65 years or older group, but only in the low-risk subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Donor age may correlate with graft survival in primary PK performed with imported donor corneas. Donor age could be a considerable factor in primary PK with imported donor corneas, especially in preoperatively low-risk patients.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cellular phones enable communication between healthcare providers and patients for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases. However, few studies have examined the user-friendliness or effectiveness of cellular phone-based medical informatics (CPBMI) for healthcare. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study investigated the use of CPBMI to identify its current status within the medical field, advantages and disadvantages, practicability, clinical effectiveness, costs, and cost-saving potential. RESULTS: CPBMI was validated in terms of practicality and provision of medical benefits. It is critical to use CPBMI in accordance with the different features of each disease and condition. Use of CPBMI is expected to be especially useful for patients with chronic disease. CONCLUSIONS: We discussed the current status of the clinical use, benefits, and risks of CPBMI. CPBMI and information technology-based health management tools are anticipated to become useful and effective components of healthcare management in the future.

Asunto(s)