RESUMEN
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of current information regarding young-onset diabetes in Thailand. Thus, the objectives of this study were to describe the types of diabetes, the clinical characteristics, the treatment regimens and achievement of glycemic control in Thai patients with young-onset diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 2,844 patients with diabetes onset before 30 years-of-age were retrospectively reviewed from a diabetes registry comprising 31 hospitals in Thailand. Gestational diabetes was excluded. RESULTS: Based on clinical criteria, type 1 diabetes was identified in 62.6% of patients, type 2 diabetes in 30.7%, neonatal diabetes in 0.8%, other monogenic diabetes in 1.7%, secondary diabetes in 3.0%, genetic syndromes associated with diabetes in 0.9% and other types of diabetes in 0.4%. Type 1 diabetes accounted for 72.3% of patients with age of onset <20 years. The proportion of type 2 diabetes was 61.0% of patients with age of onset from 20 to <30 years. Intensive insulin treatment was prescribed to 55.2% of type 1 diabetes patients. Oral antidiabetic agent alone was used in 50.8% of type 2 diabetes patients, whereas 44.1% received insulin treatment. Most monogenic diabetes, secondary diabetes and genetic syndromes associated with diabetes required insulin treatment. Achievement of glycemic control was identified in 12.4% of type 1 diabetes patients, 30% of type 2 diabetes patients, 36.4% of neonatal diabetes patients, 28.3% of other monogenic diabetes patients, 45.6% of secondary diabetes patients and 28% of genetic syndromes associated with diabetes patients. CONCLUSION: In this registry, type 1 diabetes remains the most common type and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes increases with age. The majority of patients did not achieve the glycemic target, especially type 1 diabetes patients.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Insulinas , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Insulinas/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome , Tailandia/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Healthcare service in Thailand is stratified into three levels with different facilities of care. This cross-sectional survey study described diabetes management, diabetes control, and late complication status among patients managed in urban primary health care clinics. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Thirty-seven primary health care units were randomly selected. Each unit enrolled up to 30 patients having been managed in the unit for at least one year. The patients were interviewed, and the medical records such as demographic data, management practice, glycemic control, and complications were retrospectively reviewed for a period of one year. All data were entered in the case record forms, transferred into a database by electronic scanning, and analyzed by SAS version 6.12. One thousand and seventy-eight patients, including 300 males and 778 females, were recruited in the present study. RESULT: Their mean +/- SD of age, onset age, and diabetes duration were 58.2 +/- 11.3, 52.2 +/- 11.4 and 6.2 +/- 4.0 years, respectively. Six percent of the patients were type 1, and 94% were type 2 diabetes. Two-thirds of the patients engaged in diabetes education > or = 5 days during the previous year. Monitoring of glycemic control was largely by measurement of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in the unit. Determination of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol, serum creatinine, urinary protein, and microalbuminuria were observed in 0.7, 17.4, 11.7, 6.9, 38.2, 33.0, and 0.9% of the patients, respectively. Mean +/- SD of FPG was 8.3 +/- 2.7 mmol/l, and HbA1c was 8.6 +/- 1.9%. The percentage of patients with FPG < 6.7 mmol/l and HbA1c < 7% were 28.7 and 19.6%, respectively. An annual eye and foot examination was performed in 21.5% and 45% of the patients, respectively. The prevalence of late complications included retinopathy (13.6%), proteinuria (17.0%), end stage renal failure (0.1%), peripheral neuropathy (34%), acute foot ulcer/gangrene (1.2%), healed foot ulcer (6.9%), stroke (1.9%), and myocardial infarction (0.7%). CONCLUSION: The present study results demonstrated that necessary, routine assessments were not regularly practiced by caregivers in primary care units. In addition, peripheral neuropathy was the most common observed complication and this might explain the high rate of foot ulcers in this cohort.