Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Biomed Eng Online ; 14: 30, 2015 Apr 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25889735

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Myoelectric controlled prosthetic hand requires machine based identification of hand gestures using surface electromyogram (sEMG) recorded from the forearm muscles. This study has observed that a sub-set of the hand gestures have to be selected for an accurate automated hand gesture recognition, and reports a method to select these gestures to maximize the sensitivity and specificity. METHODS: Experiments were conducted where sEMG was recorded from the muscles of the forearm while subjects performed hand gestures and then was classified off-line. The performances of ten gestures were ranked using the proposed Positive-Negative Performance Measurement Index (PNM), generated by a series of confusion matrices. RESULTS: When using all the ten gestures, the sensitivity and specificity was 80.0% and 97.8%. After ranking the gestures using the PNM, six gestures were selected and these gave sensitivity and specificity greater than 95% (96.5% and 99.3%); Hand open, Hand close, Little finger flexion, Ring finger flexion, Middle finger flexion and Thumb flexion. CONCLUSION: This work has shown that reliable myoelectric based human computer interface systems require careful selection of the gestures that have to be recognized and without such selection, the reliability is poor.


Asunto(s)
Miembros Artificiales , Electromiografía , Gestos , Mano , Músculo Esquelético/fisiología , Reconocimiento de Normas Patrones Automatizadas/métodos , Interfaz Usuario-Computador , Algoritmos , Antebrazo/fisiología , Humanos , Aprendizaje Automático , Diseño de Prótesis , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
2.
Biomed Eng Online ; 13: 155, 2014 Nov 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25422006

RESUMEN

Automatic and accurate identification of elbow angle from surface electromyogram (sEMG) is essential for myoelectric controlled upper limb exoskeleton systems. This requires appropriate selection of sEMG features, and identifying the limitations of such a system.This study has demonstrated that it is possible to identify three discrete positions of the elbow; full extension, right angle, and mid-way point, with window size of only 200 milliseconds. It was seen that while most features were suitable for this purpose, Power Spectral Density Averages (PSD-Av) performed best. The system correctly classified the sEMG against the elbow angle for 100% cases when only two discrete positions (full extension and elbow at right angle) were considered, while correct classification was 89% when there were three discrete positions. However, sEMG was unable to accurately determine the elbow position when five discrete angles were considered. It was also observed that there was no difference for extension or flexion phases.


Asunto(s)
Brazo/fisiología , Electromiografía/métodos , Adulto , Tirantes , Codo/fisiología , Articulación del Codo/fisiología , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Músculo Esquelético/fisiología , Músculos/fisiología , Reconocimiento de Normas Patrones Automatizadas , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Programas Informáticos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA