RESUMEN
The electrochemical reduction (ECR) of CO2 to CO by nickel-N4-Schiff base complexes as catalysts was investigated using density functional theory (DFT). Three nickel complexes, 1-Ni, 2-Ni, and [2-Ni]Me were considered. Two CO2 reduction pathways, i.e., external and internal proton transfer, were proposed and their reaction energy profiles were computed. The external proton transfer pathway which includes three steps has no transition state. The reaction energies for all steps are exothermic and the reaction catalyzed by 1-Ni has the lowest overall reaction energy (-5.72 eV) followed by those by 2-Ni (-5.56 eV) and [2-Ni]Me (-5.54 eV). The internal proton transfer pathway is composed of four steps. The internal proton transfer step (carboxylic formation) includes a transition state. The CO2 reduction by [2-Ni]Me could not proceed via this mechanism, since [2-Ni]Me does not have an NH group in the ligand and 1-Ni has a lower activation energy (0.83 eV), which is in agreement with the experiment. The charge of the pre-adsorption nickel complex seems to be related to the activity of the catalysts. The catalyst with a less positive nickel charge is more active.
RESUMEN
Effects of size, shape, and pyrene doping on electronic properties of graphene nanoflakes (GNFs) were theoretically investigated using density functional theory method with PBE, B3PW91, and M06-2X functionals and cc-pVDZ basis set. Two shapes of zigzag GNFs, hexagonal (HGN) and rhomboidal (RGN), were considered. The energy band gap of GNF depends on shape and decreases with size. The HGN has larger band gap energy (1.23-3.96 eV) than the RGN (0.13-2.12 eV). The doping of pyrene and pyrene derivatives on both HGN and RGN was also studied. The adsorption energy of pyrene and pyrene derivatives on GNF does not depend on the shape of GNFs with energies between 21 and 27 kcal mol-1. The substituent on pyrene enhances the binding to GNF but the strength does not depend on electron withdrawing or donating capability. The doping by pyrene and pyrene derivatives also shifts the HOMO and LUMO energies of GNFs. Both positive (destabilizing) and negative (stabilizing) shifts on HOMO and LUMO of GNFs were seen. The direction and magnitude of the shift do not follow the electron withdrawing and donating capability of pyrene substituents. However, only a slight shift was observed for doped RGN. A shift of 0.19 eV was noticed for HOMO of HGN doped with 1-aminopyrene (pyNH2) and of 0.04 eV for LUMO of HGN doped with 1-pyrenecarboxylic acid (pyCOOH). Graphical Abstract HOMO and LUMO Energies of pyrene/pyrene derivatives doped Graphene Nanoflakes.