RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Kyphoplasty is a minimally invasive treatment for chronic refractory pain secondary to spinal compression fracture. This study investigates racial and socioeconomic disparities in kyphoplasty among the Medicare population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study utilized data from the Medicare Limited Data Sets (LDS), a CMS administrative claims database. Patients aged 18 and older with ICD code consistent with spinal pathology and compression fractures were included. Outcome was defined as kyphoplasty by race and socioeconomic status (SES) with low SES defined by dual enrollment in Medicare/Medicaid. RESULTS: There was a total of 215,502 patients gathered from CMS data, and 717 (0.33%) of these patients underwent kyphoplasty during the study period. Of these patients, 458 (63.8%) were female, the average age was 76.5 years old, 655 (91.3%) were White, 20 (2.7%) were Black, 9 (1.3%) were Hispanic, and 98 (13.7%) were Medicare/Medicaid dual eligible. White patients (32,317/157,177 [20.6%]) were less likely to be dual enrollment eligible in Medicare and Medicaid than Black (5407/13,522 [39.9%]), Hispanic (2833/3675 [77.1%]), Asian (2087/3312 [63.0%]), or North American Native patients (778/1578 [49.1%]). Multivariate regression (MVR) analysis was performed and showed that Blacks were less likely than Whites to have a kyphoplasty performed (OR 0.46 [95% CI: 0.29-0.72], p-value <0.001). Although Hispanics (OR 0.95 [0.49-1.86]), North American Native (OR 0.82 [0.3-2.19]), and unknown race had a decreased odd of undergoing kyphoplasty, it was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Our study showed after adjustment for pertinent comorbidities, Medicare/Medicaid dual-eligible patients and Black patients were significantly less likely to receive kyphoplasty than White patients with Medicare.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

A recent review suggests minimal respiratory depression (RD) after perioperative methadone, while another identified RD in up to 37 percent of patients. A meta-analysis is equivocal. At our institution, five of 75 opioid naive patients (6.6 percent) given perioperative methadone received naloxone. We report three of these cases in detail. Two others were discovered during an electronic medical record search for opioid naïve patients who received methadone plus naloxone during their anesthesia care. Our five patients indicate that RD owing to methadone can occur with excessive perioperative adjuvant medications and/or in patients who are taking home central nervous system depressants. We define perioperative adjuvant medications as medications given by the anesthesiologist prior to induction and intraoperatively. The risks and benefits of perioperative methadone administration, specifically in patients who received post-operative naloxone, deserve further investigation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of administering the MoCA 5-minute test/Telephone (T-MoCA), an abbreviated version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment to older adults perioperatively DESIGN: A feasibility study including patients aged ≥ 70 years scheduled for surgery from December 2020 to March 2021 SETTING: Preoperative virtual clinic PATIENTS: Patients ≥70 years undergoing major elective surgery INTERVENTION: A study investigator called eligible patients prior to surgery, obtained consent, and completed the preoperative cognitive assessment. Follow-up assessment was completed 1-month postoperatively, and participating clinicians were surveyed at the completion of the study. MEASUREMENTS: An attention test, T-MoCA, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item (GAD-2) MAIN RESULTS: Overall, 37/40 (92.5%) patients completed the pre- and post-operative assessments. The cohort was 50% female, white (97.5%), with a median age of 76 years (interquartile range (IQR) 73-79), and education level was higher than high school in 82.5% of patients. Preoperatively, the median number of medications was 8 (IQR 7-11), 27/40 (67.5%) had medications with anticholinergic effects, and 6/40 (15%) had benzodiazepines. Median completion time of the phone assessment was 10 min (IQR 8.25-12) and 4 min (IQR 3-5) for the T-MoCA with a median T-MoCA score of 13 (IQR 12-14). Most patients (37/40) completed the post-operative assessment, and 6/37 (16.2%) reported they had experienced a change in memory or attention post-operatively. Clinician's survey reported ease and feasibility in performing T-MoCA as a preoperative cognitive evaluation. CONCLUSION: Preoperative cognitive assessment of older adults using T-MoCA over the phone is easy to perform by clinicians and had a high completion rate by patients. This test is feasible for virtual assessments. Further research is needed to better define validity and correlation with postoperative outcomes.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Preoperative clinics and patient optimization are examples of collaborative, multidisciplinary care pathways that create value. This article reviews current literature to demonstrate the importance of preoperative enhancement of patients' cognitive and functional status. This article underscores the importance of formal training in multidisciplinary topics, such as frailty, brain health, and shared decision-making for anesthesiology house staff. RECENT FINDINGS: Preoperative cognitive screening of older patients is a valuable metric for risk stratification and detection of patients at risk of postoperative delirium. Frailty is another syndrome that can be identified and optimized preoperatively. Sarcopenia has been shown to correlate with frailty; this shows promise as a method to detect frailty preoperatively. SUMMARY: Anesthesiologists as perioperative physicians are in a unique position to lead and coordinate interdisciplinary conversations that incorporate patient goal concordant care and realistic assessment of perioperative complications. Formal house staff training in early recognition and management of patients at risk of adverse outcomes in the short and long term postoperatively improves patient outcomes and decreases healthcare spending.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Patient falls are a preventable public health problem, and they are among the most reported safety incidents in the hospital. We used a hospital safety reporting system to examine the nature of reported falls in the perioperative setting at an academic tertiary center. METHODS: In this retrospective study, reports of perioperative safety events listed as "Falls" between 2014 and 2020 were analyzed for severity level and specific event type. RESULTS: Out of 8337 safety reports from 2014 to 2020, 86 were "fall" related (1%). The most common "fall" event type was "ambulating with assistance and the severity level reported was mainly level 1 (no harm, did reach patient, 63%) followed by level 2 (temporary or minor harm, 28%). One of the most frequently reported types of perioperative falls was from a bed or stretcher (15% of falls)". CONCLUSIONS: Our safety data reporting system identified falls as a safety event that causes patient harm in the perioperative setting that could be preventable with a multifaceted interdisciplinary approach. Risk managers can use these data to implement strategies to reduce falls such as creating screening protocols to identify high-risk patients, educating and training healthcare personnel, and optimizing operating room, hospital, and equipment design.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Adverse event reporting systems are important tools for identifying areas of risk and opportunities quality improvement. Perioperative airway management (PAM) carries patient risk. We examine the nature of PAM incident reports at an academic tertiary care center. In this retrospective data review, perioperative safety reports filed under "Airway Management" between 2015 and 2020 were analyzed. Data analyzed included severity level (patient harm) and specific event type. There was a total of 7827 safety reports filed from January 2015 to July 2020, with 67 reports related to "Airway Management" (0.85%). The most common specific event type in this safety reporting database was "Intubation Injury (Mouth, Tooth, Airway)" (35.8%). The most common severity level of all reported events was level 2 (temporary or minor harm, 57%). Our safety reporting data demonstrates that adverse events related to PAM are likely to reach the patient and can cause significant harm. Data from our findings can help providers and risk managers to focus efforts on reducing patient harm. Strategies include continued education in technical skills and crisis management, preparation for the difficult airway, increased availability of video laryngoscopes, ongoing safety reporting and collaborative review of adverse events with implementation of quality improvement measures.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Adverse event reporting systems are important tools for identifying areas of risk and opportunities for education and improvement. Our goal was to examine the nature of perioperative incident reports related to care coordination that were filed by staff at an academic tertiary care center. In this retrospective data review, perioperative safety reports between 2015 and 2020 were analyzed. Information examined included the type of staff who initiated the report, location of the incident, type of incident and the severity level of event, including patient harm. Out of the 7827 reports evaluated, 61.2% of reports were filed by nurses, and 5.6% by physicians. We investigated one particular category called "coordination of care" and found the specific event most commonly reported was insufficient handoff (15.0%-26.9%), with severity level reported primarily being no to minor harm reaching the patient. However, communication failures were judged to be one of leading causes of inadvertent harm. It is imperative for hospital incident reporting systems to collect data on issues related to communication failures and to design interventions with the help of frontline staff to provide high quality, safe care to patients and to remain compliant with regulatory requirements and hospital policies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The study assessed whether pre-existing cognitive impairment (CI) prior to elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with worse postoperative outcomes such as delirium, in-hospital medical complications, 30-day mortality, hospital length of stay and non-home discharge. METHODS: A retrospective database analysis from the NSQIP Geriatric Surgery Pilot Project was used. There was an initial cohort of 6350 patients undergoing elective TKA, 104 patients with CI were propensity score matched to 104 patients without CI. RESULTS: Analysis demonstrated a significantly increased incidence of post-operative delirium (POD) in the cohort with pre-op CI (p = < .001), a worsened functional status (p = < .001) and increased nonhome discharge postoperatively compared to the group without CI (p = 0.029). Other post-operative outcomes included 30-day mortality of 0% in both groups, and low rate of complications such as infection (2.88% vs 0.96%), pneumonia (1.92% vs 0%), failure to wean (0.96% vs 0%), and reintubation (0.96% vs 0%). Some other differences between the CI group and non-CI group, although not statistically significant, included increased rate of transfusion (10.58% vs 6.73%), and sepsis (1.92% vs 0%). The length of stay was increased in the non-CI group (4.28% vs 2.32%, p = 0.122). CONCLUSION: CI in patients undergoing TKA is associated with an increased risk of POD, worsened postoperative functional status, and discharge to non-home facility.

RESUMEN

Studies have shown conflicting data with regard to the volume and outcome relationship for gastrectomy. Using the University HealthSystem Consortium national database, we examined the influence of the hospital's volume of gastrectomy on outcomes at academic centers between 2004 and 2008. Outcome measures, including length of stay, 30-day readmission, morbidity, and in-hospital mortality, were compared among high- (13 or greater), medium- (6 to 12), and low-volume (five or less) hospitals. There were 10 high- (n = 593 cases), 36 medium- (n = 1076 cases), and 75 low-volume (n = 500 cases) hospitals. There were no significant differences between high- and low-volume hospitals with regard to length of stay, overall complications, 30-day readmission rate, and in-hospital mortality (2.4 vs 4.4%, respectively, P = 0.06). Despite the small number of gastrectomies performed at the low-volume hospitals, these same hospitals performed a large number of other types of gastric surgery such as gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity (102 cases/year). Within the context of academic medical centers, lower annual volume of gastrectomy for neoplasm is not a predictor of poor outcomes which may be explained by the gastric operative experience derived from other types of gastric surgery.

Asunto(s)