RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with lissencephaly typically present with severe psychomotor retardation and drug-resistant seizures. The aim of this study was to characterize the epileptic phenotype in a genotypically and radiologically well-defined patient cohort and to evaluate the response to antiseizure medication (ASM). Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated 47 patients of five genetic forms (LIS1/PAFAH1B1, DCX, DYNC1H1, TUBA1A, TUBG1) using family questionnaires, standardized neuropediatric assessments, and patients' medical reports. RESULTS: All but two patients were diagnosed with epilepsy. Median age at seizure onset was 6 months (range: 2.1-42.0), starting with epileptic spasms in 70%. Standard treatment protocols with hormonal therapy (ACTH or corticosteroids) and/or vigabatrin were the most effective approach for epileptic spasms, leading to seizure control in 47%. Seizures later in the disease course were most effectively treated with valproic acid and lamotrigine, followed by vigabatrin and phenobarbital, resulting in seizure freedom in 20%. Regarding psychomotor development, lissencephaly patients presenting without epileptic spasms were significantly more likely to reach various developmental milestones compared to patients with spasms. CONCLUSION: Classic lissencephaly is highly associated with drug-resistant epilepsy starting with epileptic spasms in most patients. The standard treatment protocols for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome lead to freedom from seizures in around half of the patients. Due to the association of epileptic spasms with an unfavorable course of psychomotor development, early and reliable diagnosis and treatment of spasms should be pursued. For epilepsies occurring later in childhood, ASM with valproic acid and lamotrigine, followed by vigabatrin and phenobarbital, appears to be most effective.
RESUMEN
Background: For adult multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, impaired temporal processing of simultaneity/successiveness has been frequently reported although interval timing has been investigated in neither adult nor pediatric MS patients. We aim to extend previous research in two ways. First, we focus on interval timing (instead of simultaneity/successiveness) and differentiate between sensory-automatic processing of intervals in the subsecond range and cognitive processing of intervals in the one-second range. Second, we investigate whether impaired temporal information processing would also be observable in pediatric MS patients' interval timing in the subsecond and one-second ranges. Methods: Participants were 22 pediatric MS patients and 22 healthy controls, matched for age, gender, and psychometric intelligence as measured by the Culture Fair Test 20-R. They completed two auditory interval-timing tasks with stimuli in the subsecond and one-second ranges, respectively, as well as a frequency discrimination task. Results: Pediatric MS patients showed impaired interval timing in the subsecond range compared to healthy controls with a mean difference of the difference limen (DL) of 6.3 ms, 95% CI [1.7, 10.9 ms] and an effect size of Cohen's d = 0.830. The two groups did not differ significantly in interval timing in the one-second range (mean difference of the DL = 26.9 ms, 95% CI [-14.2, 67.9 ms], Cohen's d = 0.399) or in frequency discrimination (mean difference of the DL = 0.4 Hz, 95% CI [-1.1, 1.9 Hz], Cohen's d = 0.158). Conclusion: The results indicate that, in particular, the sensory-automatic processing of intervals in the subsecond range but not the cognitive processing of longer intervals is impaired in pediatric MS patients. This differential pattern of results is unlikely to be explained by general deficits of auditory information processing. A tentative explanation, to be tested in future studies, points to subcortical deficits in pediatric MS patients, which might also underlie deficits in speech and visuomotor coordination typically reported in pediatric MS patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Processing speed is frequently reduced in patients suffering from multiple sclerosis (MS). Reduced processing speed can also lead to impaired working memory capacity (WMC) in adult MS patients. Less is known about the interplay of cognitive deficits in paediatric MS patients. OBJECTIVES: In the present study, we investigated whether processing speed and WMC are reduced in paediatric MS patients compared with healthy controls and whether reduced processing speed and WMC might explain potential differences in psychometric intelligence between MS patients and healthy controls. METHODS: Twenty-one paediatric MS patients and 21 healthy controls completed a reaction time (RT) task, a working memory task, and Cattell's Culture Fair Test (CFT20-R). RESULTS: Patients with MS had slower RT and lower intelligence scores than healthy controls. We could find no significant differences for WMC. An analysis of covariance revealed that group differences in intelligence could be partially explained by processing speed differences. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that processing speed is a good marker for MS-related impaired efficiency and increased error-proneness of the central nervous system in higher-order cognition as required by Cattell's CFT20-R.
RESUMEN
Epigenetic alterations are common events in cancer. Using a genome wide methylation screen (Restriction Landmark Genomic Scanning-RLGS) we identified the gene for the dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) as tumor-specific methylated. As DRD4 is involved in early brain development and may thus be involved in developmentally dependent tumors of the CNS in children epigenetic deregulation of DRD4 and its functional consequences were analyzed in vitro. CpG methylation of DRD4 was detected in 18/24 medulloblastomas, 23/29 ependymomas, 6/6 high-grade gliomas, 7/10 CNS PNET and 8/8 cell lines by qCOBRA and bisulfite sequencing. Real-time RT-PCR demonstrated a significantly inferior expression of DRD4 in primary tumors compared to cell lines and non-malignant control tissues. Epigenetic deregulation of DRD4 was analyzed in reexpression experiments and restoration of DRD4 was observed in medulloblastoma (MB) cells treated with 5-Aza-CdR. Reexpression was not accompanied by demethylation of the DRD4 promoter but by a significant decrease of H3K27me3 and of bound enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2). Knockdown of EZH2 demonstrated DRD4 as a direct target for inhibition by EZH2. Stimulation of reexpressed DRD4 resulted in an activation of ERK1/2. Our analyses thus disclose that DRD4 is epigenetically repressed in CNS tumors of childhood. DRD4 is a direct target of EZH2 in MB cell lines. EZH2 appears to dominate over aberrant DNA methylation in the epigenetic inhibition of DRD4, which eventually leads to inhibition of a DRD4-mediated stimulation of the ERK1/2 kinase pathway.