RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) is a common method of assessing clinical skills used at many universities. An important and at the same time difficult aspect of good examination preparation is obtaining a properly trained and well-motivated group of assessors. To effectively recruit and maintain cooperation with assessors, it is worth to know their opinion. The aim of this study was to investigate the opinions of teacher-examiners about OSCE and to identify the factors that could shape this opinion and influence on motivation. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a questionnaire on teachers who participated as OSCE examiners. This questionnaire consisted of 21 questions about their perceptions. Answers were rated in a five-point Likert-type scale. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: A total of 49 (out of 52) teachers participated in this study. Nearly 90% of examiners believed that it is fair, more than 90% that it is transparent. Despite the fact that 67% of examiners believe the examination is difficult to organize and 71% believe it is stressful for students, according to 72% of respondents the OSCE has a positive effect on learning. More than 91% of examiners believed that the OSCE is an appropriate test to assess students' skills. Opinions about examination were independent of specialty, seniority, gender or taking the OSCE as students. CONCLUSION: Teacher-examiners viewed the OSCE as a fair and transparent examination, adequate for assessment of skills and, despite it being difficult to organize, worth doing as it is appropriate to assess practical skills and positively influences students' motivation to learn tested skills.
Asunto(s)
Sesgo , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Forenses/psicología , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Docentes Médicos/psicología , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polonia , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 2015 Department of Medical Education in Medical College of Jagiellonian University in Cracow performed a new format of integrated multidisciplinary skills assessment of third year students of medicine a er completing initial courses in internal medicine, surgery, pediatrics and gynecology. AIM: OSCE assessed from the perspective of 3rd year medical students. METHODS: Students of 3rd year's study of Faculty of medicine were evaluated by OSCE, which assessed their internal medicine, surgery, gynecology, pediatric skills. OSCE consisted of 12 stations. In order to assess student's opinions on OSCE, we used method of diagnostic survey; Statistica 12.0. RESULTS: OSCE passed 255 (98.83%) of the students in thefirst term. We analyzed 221 questionnaires, in which students expressed their opinion. 93.7% of the students considered OSCE as a well organized exam. 87.8% of students claimed that OSCE is fair and 95.5% that the exam is clear. 86.4% students are pleased with the introduction information about OSCE that was given before the examination. 78.6% students believe, that OSCE allows to properly identify skills that require improvement. Students, who didn't pass all stations with positive result, more o en (Chi^2 Pearsona, p = 0.01990) indicated improper balance between quantity of stations that check communication skills and these checking other clinical skills. CONCLUSIONS: is study confirms that OSCE in the students' opinions was well organized and fair. It proves that OSCE correctly selects students who need to improve their knowledge and skills. Students' preparing to the exams, their knowledge and skills, influences on the students' perception of OSCE.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Evaluación Educacional/normas , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Curriculum/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Polonia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Introduction: Reduction of risk factors of atherosclerosis, lifestyle modification significantly cause the reduction in the incidence, morbidity and mortality of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Objective: To evaluate cardiovascular risk factors and analyze the lifestyle of students finishing the first year of studies at selected universities in Krakow. Material and Methods: The study was performed in 2015roku. 566 students finishing the first year of study, including 319 (56.4%) men and 247 (43.6%) women were examined. The students were in age from 18 to 27 years, an average of 20.11± 1.15 years. They represented 6 different universities in Cracow. In order to assess eating habits, lifestyle and analysis of risk factors of cardiovascular disease was used method of diagnostic survey using the survey technique. BMI was calculated from anthropometric measurements. The program Statistica 12.0 were used in statistical analysis. Results: The analysis showed that most fruits and vegetables consume UR students and AWF, least of AGH. Only 34.8% of students regularly consume fish of the sea, there were no significant differences between universities. Sports frequently cultivate the students of AWF (93% of the students of this university). Academy of Fine Arts students drink the most coffee. Students of AGH frequently consume alcohol. 60% of all students never tried drugs, but only 25.7% of student of Fine Arts never tried drugs. Overweight occurs in 12.6% of students, and obesity in 1.1%. Conclusions: The most risk factors of atherosclerosis occur in students of AGH and ASP. The results of the study clearly indicate on the necessity of implementation of prevention and improvement of health behaviors in students of AGH and ASP universities.