RESUMEN
Alport syndrome (AS) is the most frequent monogenic inherited glomerulopathy and is also genetically and clinically heterogeneous. It is caused by semi-dominant pathogenic variants in the X-linked COL4A5 (NM_000495.5) gene or recessive variants in the COL4A3/COL4A4 (NM_000091.4/NM_000092.4) genes. The disease manifests in early childhood with persistent microhematuria and can progress to proteinuria and kidney failure in adolescence or early adulthood if left untreated. On biopsy, pathognomonic features include alternate thinning, thickening and lamellation of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM), in the presence of podocyte foot process effacement. Although previous studies indicate a prevalence of AS of about 1/50,000, a recent publication reported a predicted rate of pathogenic COL4A5 variants of 1/2320. We herewith present 98 patients (40 M/58 F) from 26 Greek families. We are selectively presenting the families segregating the X-linked form of AS with pathogenic variants in the COL4A5 gene. We found 21 different pathogenic variants, 12 novel: eight glycine and one proline substitutions in the collagenous domain, one cysteine substitution in the NC1 domain, two premature termination of translation codons, three splicing variants, one 5-bp insertion/frameshift variant, one indel-frameshift variant and four gross deletions. Notably, patients in six families we describe here and three families we reported previously, carried the COL4A5-p.G624D substitution, a founder defect encountered all over Europe which is hypomorphic with mostly milder symptomatology. Importantly, on several occasions, the correct genetic diagnosis reclassified patients as patients with AS, leading to termination of previous immunosuppressive/cyclosporine A therapy and a switch to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi). With the understanding that all 98 patients span a wide range of ages from infancy to late adulthood, 15 patients (11 M/4 F) reached kidney failure and 11 (10 M/1 F) received a transplant. The prospects of avoiding lengthy diagnostic investigations and erroneous medications, and the advantage of delaying kidney failure with very early administration of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade, highlights the importance of timely documentation of AS by genetic diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Nefritis Hereditaria , Insuficiencia Renal , Adolescente , Humanos , Preescolar , Adulto , Nefritis Hereditaria/genética , Grecia , Colágeno Tipo IV/genética , HematuriaRESUMEN
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Current recommendations suggest the use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) as the gold standard for hypertension diagnosis and management in hemodialysis patients. This study assesses the accuracy of peridialytic, intradialytic, and scheduled interdialytic recordings in detecting abnormally elevated 44-hour interdialytic blood pressure (BP). STUDY DESIGN: Diagnostic test study. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: 242 Greek hemodialysis patients who successfully underwent ABPM. TESTS COMPARED: Ambulatory BP was used as the reference method to evaluate the accuracy of the following BP metrics: predialysis and postdialysis BP, intradialytic BP, intradialytic plus pre/postdialysis BP, and scheduled interdialytic BP (on an off-dialysis day at 8:00 am, 8:00 pm, and their average). OUTCOME: 44-hour ambulatory systolic BP/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP) ≥ 130/80 mm Hg. RESULTS: The 44-hour SBP/DBP levels differed significantly from predialysis and postdialysis BP but showed no or minor differences compared with the other BP metrics. Bland-Altman plots showed an absence of systematic bias for all metrics but large between-method difference and wider 95% limits of agreement for predialysis and postdialysis BP compared with intradialytic, intradialytic plus pre/postdialysis, and averaged scheduled interdialytic BP. The sensitivity/specificity and κ-statistic for diagnosing 44-hour SBP ≥ 130 mm Hg were low for predialysis (86.5%/38.6%, κ-statistic = 0.27) and postdialysis BP (63.1%/73.3%, κ-statistic = 0.35), but better for intradialytic BP (77.3%/76.2%, κ-statistic = 0.53), intradialytic plus pre/postdialysis BP (76.6%/72.3%, κ-statistic = 0.49), and scheduled interdialytic BP (87.9%/77.2%, κ-statistic = 0.66). In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, the areas under the curve (AUC) of predialysis SBP (AUC = 0.723) and postdialysis SBP (AUC = 0.746) were significantly lower than that of intradialytic SBP (AUC = 0.850), intradialytic plus pre/postdialysis SBP (AUC = 0.850), and scheduled interdialytic SBP (AUC = 0.917) (z test, P < 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons). Similar observations were made for DBP. LIMITATIONS: Typical home BP data were not obtained, and no assessment was obtained of the reproducibility of the examined metrics over time. CONCLUSIONS: Intradialytic, intradialytic plus pre/postdialysis, and scheduled interdialytic BP measurements were more accurate in detecting elevated 44-hour BP than predialysis and postdialysis BP. Averaged intradialytic BP recordings or scheduled readings at the off-dialysis day appear to be promising approaches to the diagnosis of elevated BP in hemodialysis.
Asunto(s)
Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial , Hipertensión , Presión Sanguínea , Humanos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Diálisis Renal , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Patients with end-stage renal-disease under hemodialysis have increased cardiovascular risk and experience severe blood pressure (BP) fluctuations during the dialysis session and the subsequent interdialytic period. BP variability (BPV) may be an additional risk factor for cardiovascular events and preliminary data suggest increased BPV with advancing stages of chronic kidney disease. This is the first study to examine BPV during the whole intradialytic and interdialytic period in hemodialysis patients with ambulatory BP monitoring. METHODS: A total of 160 patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis had 48-h ambulatory BP monitoring with the Mobil-O-Graph device during a regular dialysis session and the subsequent interdialytic interval. Brachial and aortic BPV were calculated with validated formulas and were compared between Days 1 and 2 of the interdialytic period (44-h), Days 1 and 2 of the total 48-h interval (including the dialysis session), and between the two respective daytime periods and night-time periods. RESULTS: All brachial SBPV indices [SD: 14.75â±â4.38 vs. 15.91â±â4.41, Pâ=â0.001; weighted SD: 13.80â±â4.00 vs. 14.89â±â3.90, Pâ<â0.001; coefficient of variation (CV): 11.34â±â2.91 vs. 11.93â±â2.94, Pâ=â0.011; average real variability (ARV): 11.38â±â3.44 vs. 12.32â±â3.65, Pâ<â0.001)] were increasing from Days 1 to 2 of the 44-h interdialytic period. Similarly, all indexes of DBPV were significantly increased in Day 2, except for CV. Aortic SBPV and DBPV indices displayed a similar pattern. Furthermore, all studied brachial SBPV and DBPV indexes were also lower during daytimes 1 than 2 (systolic ARV 11.56â±â3.98 vs. 12.44â±â4.03, Pâ=â0.002); systolic ARV was lower in night-time 1 compared with night-time 2 (11.20â±â5.09 vs. 12.18â±â4.66, Pâ=â0.045). In multivariate regression analysis prehemodialysis SBP, age and diabetes were independently associated with increased SBP ARV. CONCLUSION: BPV is increased in interdialytic Day 2 compared with Day 1 in hemodialysis patients; this could be another mechanism involved in the complex cardiovascular pathophysiology and increased cardiovascular mortality of these individuals.
Asunto(s)
Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal , Anciano , Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial/instrumentación , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Arterial stiffness and augmentation of aortic blood pressure (BP) measured in office are known cardiovascular risk factors in hemodialysis patients. This study examines the prognostic significance of ambulatory brachial BP, central BP, pulse wave velocity (PWV), and heart rate-adjusted augmentation index [AIx(75)] in this population. A total of 170 hemodialysis patients underwent 48-hour ambulatory monitoring with Mobil-O-Graph-NG during a standard interdialytic interval and followed-up for 28.1±11.2 months. The primary end point was a combination of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke. Secondary end points included: (1) all-cause mortality; (2) cardiovascular mortality; and (3) a combination of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, resuscitation after cardiac arrest, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure. During follow-up, 37(21.8%) patients died and 46(27.1%) had cardiovascular events. Cumulative freedom from primary end point was similar for quartiles of predialysis-systolic BP (SBP), 48-hour peripheral-SBP, and central-SBP, but was progressively longer for increasing quartiles for 48-hour peripheral-diastolic BP and central-diastolic BP and shorter for increasing quartiles of 48-hour central pulse pressure (83.7%, 71.4%, 69.0%, 62.8% [log-rank P=0.024]), PWV (93.0%, 81.0%, 57.1%, 55.8% [log-rank P<0.001]), and AIx(75) (88.4%, 66.7%, 69.0%, 62.8% [log-rank P=0.014]). The hazard ratios for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and the combined outcome were similar for quartiles of predialysis-SBP, 48-hour peripheral-SBP, and central-SBP, but were increasing with higher ambulatory PWV and AIx(75). In multivariate analysis, 48-hour PWV was the only vascular parameter independently associated with the primary end point (hazard ratios, 1.579; 95% confidence intervals, 1.187-2.102). Ambulatory PWV, AIx(75), and central pulse pressure are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality, whereas office and ambulatory SBP are not. These findings further support that arterial stiffness is the prominent cardiovascular risk factor in hemodialysis.
Asunto(s)
Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial/métodos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Análisis de la Onda del Pulso/métodos , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Rigidez Vascular/fisiología , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Grecia/epidemiología , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Diálisis Renal/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Wave reflections and arterial stiffness are independent cardiovascular risk factors in ESRD. Previous studies in this population included only static recordings before and after dialysis. This study investigated the variation of these indices during intra- and interdialytic intervals and examined demographic, clinical, and hemodynamic variables related to arterial function in patients undergoing hemodialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Between February 2013 and May 2014, a total of 153 patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis in five dialysis centers of northern Greece underwent ambulatory BP monitoring with the newly introduced Mobil-O-Graph device (IEM, Stolberg, Germany) over a midweek dialysis session and the subsequent interdialytic period. Mobil-O-Graph is an oscillometric device that records brachial BP and pulse waves and estimates, via generalized transfer function, aortic BP, augmentation index (AIx) as a measure of wave reflections, and pulse wave velocity (PWV) as an index of arterial stiffness. RESULTS: AIx was lower during dialysis than in the interdialytic period of dialysis-on day (Day 1) (mean±SD, 24.7%±9.7% versus 26.8%±9.4%; P<0.001). In contrast, PWV remained unchanged between these intervals (9.31±2.2 versus 9.29±2.3 m/sec; P=0.60). Both AIx and PWV increased during dialysis-off day (Day 2) versus the out-of-dialysis period of Day 1 (28.8%±9.8% versus 26.8%±9.4% [P<0.001] and 9.39±2.3 versus 9.29±2.3 m/sec [P<0.001]). Older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.02 to 1.15), female sex (OR, 7.56; 95% CI, 1.64 to 34.81), diabetic status (OR, 8.84; 95% CI, 1.76 to 17.48), and higher mean BP (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.27) were associated with higher odds of high AIx; higher heart rate was associated with lower odds (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.80) of high AIx. Older age (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.61 to 2.58) and higher mean BP (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.27) were independent correlates of high PWV. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a gradual interdialytic increase in AIx, whereas PWV was only slightly elevated during Day 2. Future studies are needed to elucidate the value of these ambulatory measures for cardiovascular risk prediction in ESRD.