RESUMEN
During the COVID-19 public health emergency, states waived in-state licensure and pre-existing patient-physician relationship requirements to increase access to care. We exploit this state telehealth policy variation to estimate the association of in-state licensure requirement waivers and pre-existing patient-physician relationship requirement waivers with out-of-state tele-mental health care utilization of patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Using claims from January 2019 until December 2021 of 2 037 977 commercially insured individuals in 3 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) straddling Midwestern state borders, we found increased out-of-state telehealth utilization as a share of out-of-state mental health care by 0.1411 and 0.0575 visits per month or 1679.76% and 467.48% after licensure and relationship waivers, respectively. Within-MSA analyses illustrate an urban-rural digital divide in out-of-state utilization as a share of total or telehealth mental health care. Our findings indicate waivers primarily enhance access to care of established patients by enabling the transition of in-person out-of-state health care online. Interstate medical licensure compact participation may provide broader access to out-of-state tele-mental health care than emergency waivers.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the preparations made by adults to age in place and identify disparities. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among U.S. adults ages 50-80 years old (n = 2277). Individual, environmental, social, and community factors influencing readiness for aging in place were examined using chi-square tests and logistic regression. RESULTS: Income, disability status, and household composition, emerged as influential factors, often negatively affecting minority aging. Participants' consideration of aging in place was related to their disability status (OR 1.80 [1.32, 2.45]) and age (OR age 60-69 2.06 [1.54, 2.74], age 70-80 (OR 1.98 [1.46,2.67]), compared with age 50-59). Indigenous and Black older adults reported significantly higher levels of consideration for aging in place than White older adults (Indigenous OR 7.89 [2.35, 26.42], Black OR 1.71 [1.11, 2.64]). CONCLUSION: Aging in place is best facilitated by inclusive communities that prioritize adaptive homes and accessible community services.
Asunto(s)
Vida Independiente , Grupos Raciales , Humanos , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Renta , EnvejecimientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite extensive evidence that COVID-19 symptoms may persist for up to a year, their long-term implications for healthcare utilization and costs 6 months post-diagnosis remain relatively unexplored. We examine patient-level association of COVID-19 diagnosis association of COVID-19 diagnosis with average monthly healthcare utilization and medical expenditures for up to 6 months, explore heterogeneity across age groups and determine for how many months post-diagnosis healthcare utilization and costs of COVID-19 patients persist above pre-diagnosis levels. METHODS: This population-based retrospective cohort study followed COVID-19 patients' healthcare utilization and costs from January 2019 through March 2021 using claims data provided by the COVID-19 Research Database. The patient population includes 250,514 individuals infected with COVID-19 during March-September 2020 and whose last recorded claim was not hospitalization with severe symptoms. We measure the monthly number and costs of total visits and by telemedicine, preventive, urgent care, emergency, immunization, cardiology, inpatient or surgical services and established patient or new patient visits. RESULTS: The mean (SD) total number of monthly visits and costs pre-diagnosis were .4783 (4.0839) and 128.06 (1182.78) dollars compared with 1.2078 (8.4962) visits and 351.67 (2473.63) dollars post-diagnosis. COVID-19 diagnosis associated with .7269 (95% CI, 0.7088 to 0.7449 visits; P < .001) more total healthcare visits and an additional $223.60 (95% CI, 218.34 to 228.85; P < .001) in monthly costs. Excess monthly utilization and costs for individuals 17 years old and under subside after 5 months to .070 visits and $2.77, persist at substantial levels for all other groups and most pronounced among individuals age 45-64 (.207 visits and $73.43) and 65 years or older (.133 visits and $60.49). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with increased healthcare utilization and costs over a six-month post-diagnosis period. These findings imply a prolonged burden to the US healthcare system from medical encounters of COVID-19 patients and increased spending.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Gastos en Salud , Adolescente , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Prueba de COVID-19 , Atención a la Salud , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19RESUMEN
Our aim was to systematically review literature of trauma related rotator cuff tears in order to evaluate the outcome and healing integrity in relation to time of surgery. Our research question was whether earlier surgical repair leads to superior functional results. This review was conducted according to PRISMA statement. A literature search of Pubmed, Embase, Cohrane was conducted, with two researchers assessing studies for eligibility and quality. A total of 20 studies, published between 1980 and 2019, met the inclusion criteria and were divided into two groups based on duration of symptoms before surgery. Group A comprised of studies in which duration was < 3 months and Group B > 3 months. Within each group there was a statistically significant improvement in the CS from pre-operative to post-operative outcome, but the improvement for Group A was statistically higher in comparison to Group B (P=0.01). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in the final outcome for the two groups (P=0.29). The re-tear rate per 100 patients was calculated 28.5(±7.2) for Group A, and 17.2 (±12.56) for Group B (P=0.056). Our results suggest that functional outcome and tendon healing may not be valid arguments for early surgical repair. Therefore, repair of traumatic RCTs could be recommended whenever technically possible.