RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, in a large cohort of patients, oocyte quality and IVF outcome after coasting used to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation. SETTING: Retrospective study. PATIENTS: IVF cycles which had reached estradiol serum levels of at least 4,000 pg/mL without being coasted (control group, n = 208), or where coasting was applied (coasted group, n = 157). METHOD: IVF data of coasted cycles were compared with the control group. Within the group of coasted cycles, we also analyzed whether indirect parameters related to coasting had an effect on IVF results. RESULTS: Coasted patients showed higher maximum estradiol levels and greater numbers of large follicles than the control group, but lower oocyte recovery rates. There were no other significant differences between the two groups of patients. Within the group of coasted patients, no significant relation was found between the number of days of coasting, the estradiol level on the day of hCG, or the fall in estradiol and the outcome, whether measured in terms of oocyte quality, pregnancy rate, or incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation. CONCLUSION: Coasting seems to be associated with a reduced oocyte collection rate, especially when the coasting period is prolonged. However, this does not result in reduced oocyte quality. The length of the coasting period and degree of estradiol decrease do not seem to alter the results in terms of pregnancy rates.
Asunto(s)
Estradiol/sangre , Fármacos para la Fertilidad Femenina/administración & dosificación , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/administración & dosificación , Oocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Síndrome de Hiperestimulación Ovárica/prevención & control , Adulto , Gonadotropina Coriónica/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Valores de Referencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate whether a higher incidence of hyperinsulinism is found in women who have suffered from ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) as compared with other IVF patients. Additionally, we also assessed whether any abnormalities in the haemostatic system were more frequent in women with a past history of OHSS. METHODS: A pilot study was carried out involving OHSS patients and matched IVF patients. Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) of insulin sensitivity was calculated. The main outcome measures were: insulin sensitivity, coagulation anomalies, factor V Leiden mutations, methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphism and prothrombin gene mutation, protein C and protein S deficiency. RESULTS: No increased incidence in hyperinsulism nor in abnormalities of the haemostatic system were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study does not provide evidence for an increased prevalence of hyperinsulinism among women who have developed OHSS in the past.