Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transplantation ; 104(6): 1229-1238, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31490859

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We examined the 10-year experience of Mayo Clinic's kidney paired donation (KPD).We aimed to determine the benefits for the recipients of enrolled ABO/HLA compatible pairs and determine the factors associated with prolonged KPD waiting time. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 332 kidney transplants facilitated by the Mayo 3-site KPD program from September 2007 to June 2018. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) time from KPD entry to transplantation was 89 days (42-187 days). The factors independently associated with receiving a transplant >3 months after KPD entry included recipient blood type O and calculated panel reactive antibodies ≥98%. Fifty-four ABO/HLA compatible pairs participated in KPD for the following reasons: cytomegalovirus mismatch (18.5% [10/54]), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) mismatch (EBV) (9.3% [5/54]), age/size mismatch (51.9% [28/54]), or altruistic reasons (20.3% [11/54]). Cytomegalovirus and EBV mismatch were avoided in 90% (9/10) and 100% (5/5) of cases. Recipients who entered KPD for age/size mismatch and altruistic reasons received kidneys from donors with lower Living Kidney Donor Profile Index scores than their actual donor (median [interquartile range] 31.5 [12.3-47]; P < 0.001 and 26 (-1 to 46); P = 0.01 points lower, respectively). Median time to transplant from KPD entry for compatible pair recipients was 70 days (41-163 days), and 44.4% (24/54) of these transplants were preemptive. All chains/swaps incorporating compatible pairs included ABO/HLA incompatible pairs. CONCLUSIONS: KPD should be considered for all living donor/recipient pairs because the recipients of these pairs can derive personal benefit from KPD while increasing the donor pool for difficult to match pairs.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Donante/métodos , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Sistema del Grupo Sanguíneo ABO/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Altruismo , Selección de Donante/organización & administración , Selección de Donante/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Fallo Renal Crónico/sangre , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/estadística & datos numéricos , Donadores Vivos/psicología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Receptores de Trasplantes/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Transplantation ; 98(3): 300-5, 2014 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24699400

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Kidney paired donation (KPD) has emerged as a viable option for renal transplant candidates with incompatible living donors. The aim of this study was to assess the "performance" of a three-site KPD program that allowed screening of multiple donors per recipient. METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively the activity of our KPD program involving three centers under the same institutional umbrella. The primary goal was to achieve a transplant that was both ABO compatible and had a negative or low-positive flow cytometric crossmatch (+XM). RESULTS: During the 40-month study period, 114 kidney transplant candidates were enrolled-57% resulting from a +XM and 39% resulting from ABO incompatible (ABOi) donors. Important outcomes were as follows: (1) 81 (71%) candidates received a transplant and 33 (29%) were still waiting; (2) 368 donors were evaluated, including 10 nondirected donors; (3) 82% (37/45) of ABOi candidates underwent transplantation; (4) 56% (36/65) of +XM candidates underwent transplantation (however, all but four of these had a cPRA less than 95%); (5) at the end of the study period, 97% (28/29) of +XM candidates still waiting had a cPRA greater than 95%. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest evaluating large numbers of donors increases the chances of KPD. Patients with a cPRA greater than 95% are unlikely to receive a negative or low-positive +XM, suggesting the need for desensitization protocols in KPD.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Donadores Vivos , Sistema del Grupo Sanguíneo ABO/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Incompatibilidad de Grupos Sanguíneos/inmunología , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad , Humanos , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Listas de Espera
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA