RESUMEN
We report a 58-year-old female patient with the suspected diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Upon surgical exploration, examination of the appendix revealed the histological diagnosis of primary mucinous adenocarcinoma. This is an unusual consideration in the differential diagnosis of the ovarian cancer. We discuss the diagnosis, classification and treatment of the cancer of the appendix in relation to ovarian cancer.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Apéndice/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patología , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/cirugía , Neoplasias del Apéndice/patología , Neoplasias del Apéndice/cirugía , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnósticoRESUMEN
It has been postulated long ago that "eloquent" areas shift their location in patients with arteriovenous malformations (AVM). Obviously the "motor region" in not located in the precentral gyrus in a patient with an AVM in the "motor region". We report on the case of a 15-year old boy with an AVM in the left sensorimotor cortex, in whom intra-operative mapping showed an inexcitability of the precentral gyrus, while stimulation of the cortex anterior to the primary motor cortex elicited motor responses. This indicates that motor function was translocated from the primary to the supplementary motor cortex. Surgery was performed under general anaesthesia. Neurophysiological monitoring was performed throughout surgery. The central sulcus was identified by phase reversal of the somatosensory evoked potentials. The motor cortex was mapped by direct high-frequency (500 Hz) monopolar anodal stimulation. In the patient herein reported, stimulation of the "anatomically" defined primary motor cortex induced no motor response, as expected. Motor response was elicited only by stimulation of the cortex anterior to the precentral gyrus. There was no postoperative deterioration of motor function. These observations indicate that the precentral gyrus was functionally "useless". The motor region was relocated into more rostral areas in the supplementary motor cortex. This translocation of function in the presence of an AVM indicates cerebral plasticity.
Asunto(s)
Malformaciones Arteriovenosas/complicaciones , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas/cirugía , Potenciales Evocados Motores , Corteza Motora/fisiopatología , Plasticidad Neuronal , Corteza Prefrontal/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Intra-operative neurophysiological techniques allow reliable identification of the sensorimotor region and make their anatomical and functional preservation feasible. Monopolar cortical stimulation has recently been described as a new mapping technique. In the present study this method was compared to the "traditional" technique of bipolar stimulation. Functional mapping of the motor cortex was performed in 35 patients during surgery in the central region. The central sulcus (CS) was identified by somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) phase reversal. Cortical motor mapping was first performed by monopolar anodal stimulation with a train of 500 Hz (7-10 pulses) followed by bipolar stimulation (pulses at 60 Hz with max. 4 sec train duration). Surgery was performed under general anaesthesia without muscle relaxants. Of 280 motor responses elicited by bipolar cortical stimulation, 54.23% [152] were located in the primary motor cortex (PMC), 37.85% 106[ outside the motor strip in the secondary motor cortex (SMC), and 8% 22[ posterior to the CS. Of 175 motor responses elicited by monopolar cortical stimulation. 68.57% 120[ were located in the SMC, 23.42% 41[ in the SMC and 8% 14[ posterior to the CS. Contrary to the general clinical view, there is considerable overlapping of primary motor units over a cortical area much broader than the "classical" narrow motor strip along the CS. Bipolar cortical stimulation is more sensitive than monopolar for mapping motor function in the premotor frontal cortex. Both methods are equally sensitive for mapping the primary motor cortex.