RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel monotherapy improved clinical outcomes compared with aspirin monotherapy during a chronic maintenance period in patients who underwent coronary stenting in the HOST-EXAM (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis-Extended Antiplatelet Monotherapy) trial. However, it is uncertain whether the beneficial effect of clopidogrel over aspirin is different according to the renal function. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the HOST-EXAM trial. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, readmission due to acute coronary syndrome, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding type ≥3, during the 2-year follow up. Among the 5438 patients enrolled in the HOST-EXAM trial, 4844 patients (mean age, 63.3±10.6 years; 74.9% men) with a baseline creatinine value were analyzed in this study. A total of 508 (10.5%) patients had CKD, who were at higher risk of the primary end point compared with those without CKD (hazard ratio [HR], 2.01 [95% CI, 1.51-2.67]). Clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with a lower rate of the primary end point in both patients with CKD (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.44-1.25]) and patients without CKD (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.56-0.91]). No significant interaction was observed between the treatment effect and CKD status (P for interaction=0.889). CONCLUSIONS: During the chronic maintenance period after coronary stenting, the risk of thrombotic and bleeding events was significantly higher in patients with CKD compared with those without CKD. There was no statistical difference in the treatment effect of clopidogrel monotherapy in those with versus without CKD.

Asunto(s)

Aspirina , Clopidogrel , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Clopidogrel/efectos adversos , Clopidogrel/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Anciano , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Stents , Factores de Tiempo

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vulnerable plaque presents prognostic implications in addition to functional significance. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify relevant features of vulnerable plaque in functionally significant lesions. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective study conducted across 5 countries, including patients who had invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≤0.80, a total of 95 patients with available pullback pressure gradient (PPG) and plaque analysis on coronary computed tomographic angiography and optical coherence tomography were analyzed. Vulnerable plaque was defined as the presence of plaque rupture or thin-cap fibroatheroma on optical coherence tomography. Among the 25 clinical characteristics, invasive angiographic findings, physiological indexes, and coronary computed tomographic angiographic findings, significant predictors of vulnerable plaque were identified. RESULTS: Mean percentage diameter stenosis, FFR, and PPG were 77.8% ± 14.6%, 0.66 ± 0.13, and 0.65 ± 0.13, respectively. Vulnerable plaque was present in 53 lesions (55.8%). PPG and FFR were identified as significant predictors of vulnerable plaque (P < 0.05 for all). PPG >0.65 and FFR ≤0.70 were significantly related to a higher probability of vulnerable plaque after adjustment for each other (OR: 6.75 [95% CI: 2.39-19.1]; P < 0.001] for PPG >0.65; OR: 4.61 [95% CI: 1.66-12.8]; P = 0.003 for FFR ≤0.70). When categorizing lesions according to combined PPG >0.65 and FFR ≤0.70, the prevalence of vulnerable plaque was 20.0%, 57.1%, 66.7%, and 88.2% in the order of PPG ≤0.65 and FFR >0.70, PPG ≤0.65 and FFR ≤0.70, PPG >0.65 and FFR >0.70, and PPG >0.65 and FFR ≤0.70 (P for trend < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among low-FFR lesions, the presence of vulnerable plaque can be predicted by PPG combined with FFR without additional anatomical or plaque characteristics. (Precise Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Plan [P3] Study; NCT03782688).

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is preferred for treating severe aortic stenosis in older, frail populations, yet the impact of frailty on economic and clinical outcomes of TAVI is not well studied. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 2175 TAVI patients from 2015 to 2019, using Korea's National Health Insurance Service database, stratifying patients into low, intermediate, and high-frailty groups, using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS). Health care costs, admissions, and total length of hospitalization were analyzed using Wilcoxon-rank test 12 months pre- and post-TAVI. Composite endpoint of death, stroke, and major bleeding, with individual outcomes, were compared using χ2 tests and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Mean age was 80.2 years, and 47.3% were male; 747 (34.3%) were low frailty, 1159 (53.3%) were moderate frailty, and 269 (12.4%) were high frailty. After TAVI, medical costs decreased in the intermediate- (pre-TAVI: 2,269,000 KRW [$1668 USD], post-TAVI: 1,607,000 KRW [$1181 USD]; P < 0.001) and high-frailty groups (pre-TAVI: 3,949,000 KRW [$2904 USD], post-TAVI: 2,188,000 KRW [$1609 USD]; P < 0.001). All frailty groups had shorter length of hospital stay post-TAVI (26 to 21 days in the low-frailty, 44 to 31 days in the intermediate-frailty, and 65 to 41 days in the high-frailty group; all P <0.001). The composite outcome was higher in the frailer groups (27.8% in the low-frailty vs 31.5% in the intermediate-frailty vs 37.9% in the high-frailty group; P = 0.008). All groups showed comparable rates of cardiovascular death, stroke, or bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: TAVI is clinically viable and cost-saving treatment option for frail patients with severe aortic stenosis.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: AccuFFRct (ArteryFlow Technology) is a novel noninvasive method for calculating fractional flow reserve (FFR) from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). The accuracy of AccuFFRct has not been adequately assessed. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of AccuFFRct in detecting lesion-specific ischemia. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled 339 patients with 404 vessels. CCTA-derived FFR was calculated using an on-site computational fluid dynamics-based method and compared with invasive FFR. The performance of AccuFFRct was comprehensively analyzed in all lesions and subgroups, including "gray zone" lesions, various lesion classifications, clinical presentations, stenosis severities, and lesion locations. RESULTS: Using FFR ≤0.80 as a reference standard, the overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for AccuFFRct were 90.6% (95% CI: 87.3%-93.3%), 90.9% (95% CI: 85.1%-94.9%), 90.4% (95% CI: 86.1%-93.8%), 85.3% (95% CI: 79.8%-89.5%), and 94.2% (95% CI: 90.8%-96.4%), respectively. Good correlation and agreement were found between the computed AccuFFRct and measured FFR. AccuFFRct showed superior discrimination ability to CCTA (AUC: 0.93 [95% CI: 0.89-0.95] vs 0.77 [95% CI: 0.72-0.81]; P < 0.001) and quantitative coronary angiography (AUC: 0.93 [95% CI: 0.89-0.95] vs 0.89 [95% CI: 0.85-0.92]; P = 0.048) for identifying functionally significant stenosis. Notably, AccuFFRct maintained high diagnostic accuracy across the spectrum of lesion classifications, clinical presentations, stenosis severities, lesion locations, and in the "gray zone". Furthermore, in the cohort with ≥70% stenosis, AccuFFRct could significantly reduce the rate of un-necessary invasive tests (33.1% vs 6.6%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms the potential of AccuFFRct as a noninvasive alternative to invasive FFR for detecting ischemia in coronary artery disease and to risk stratify patients. The results highlight AccuFFRct's robust diagnostic ability across a wide range of lesion classifications, clinical presentations, stenosis severities, lesion locations, and in the "gray zone". (Diagnostic Performance of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary CT Angiography [ACCURATE-CT]; NCT04426396).

Asunto(s)

Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Estenosis Coronaria , Vasos Coronarios , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estenosis Coronaria/fisiopatología , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/fisiopatología , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The index of microcirculatory resistance is a reliable measure for evaluating coronary microvasculature, but its prognostic value in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of postpercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (angio-IMR) in patients with NSTEMI. METHODS: The culprit vessel's angio-IMR was measured after PCI in 2,212 NSTEMI patients at 3 sites. The primary endpoint was 2-year major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as a composite of cardiac death, readmission for heart failure, myocardial reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: The mean post-PCI angio-IMR was 20.63 ± 4.17 in NSTEMI patients. A total of 206 patients were categorized as the high post-PCI angio-IMR group according to maximally selected log-rank statistics. Patients with angio-IMR >25 showed a higher rate of MACEs than those with angio-IMR ≤25 (32.52% vs 9.37%; P < 0.001). Post-PCI angio-IMR >25 was an independent predictor of MACEs (HR: 4.230; 95% CI: 3.151-5.679; P < 0.001) and showed incremental prognostic value compared with conventional risk factors (AUC: 0.774 vs 0.716; P < 0.001; net reclassification index: 0.317; P < 0.001; integrated discrimination improvement: 0.075; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing PCI for NSTEMI, an increased post-PCI angio-IMR is associated with a higher risk of MACEs. The addition of post-PCI angio-IMR into conventional risk factors significantly improves the ability to reclassify patients and estimate the risk of MACEs. (Angiograph-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction; NCT05696379).

Asunto(s)

Angiografía Coronaria , Circulación Coronaria , Microcirculación , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Resistencia Vascular , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Recurrencia , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/fisiopatología , Readmisión del Paciente , China

RESUMEN

Identifying functional significance using physiological indexes is a standard approach in decision-making for treatment strategies in patients with coronary artery disease. Recently, coronary computed tomography angiography-based physiological assessments, such as computed tomography perfusion and fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFR-CT), have emerged. These methods have provided incremental diagnostic values for ischemia-causing lesions over anatomical stenosis defined solely by coronary computed tomography angiography. Clinical data have demonstrated their prognostic value in the prediction of adverse cardiovascular events. Several randomized controlled studies have shown that clinical use of FFR-CT can reduce unnecessary invasive procedures compared to usual care. Recent studies have also expanded the role of FFR-CT in defining target lesions for revascularization by acquiring noninvasive lesion-specific hemodynamic indexes like ΔFFR-CT. This review encompasses the current evidence of the diagnostic and prognostic performance of computed tomography-based physiological assessment in defining ischemia-causing lesions and adverse cardiac events, its clinical impact on treatment decision-making, and implications for revascularization.

RESUMEN

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) can cause myocardial ischemia in patients presenting with angina without obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA). Evaluating for CMD by using the thermodilution technique offers a widely accessible means of assessing microvascular resistance. Through this technique, 2 validated indices, namely coronary flow reserve and the index of microcirculatory resistance, can be computed, facilitating investigation of the coronary microcirculation. The index of microcirculatory resistance specifically estimates minimum achievable microvascular resistance within the coronary microcirculation. We aim to review the bolus thermodilution method, outlining the fundamental steps for conducting measurements and introducing an algorithmic approach (CATH CMD) to systematically evaluate the coronary microcirculation. Embracing a standardized approach, exemplified by the CATH CMD algorithm, will facilitate adoption of this technique and streamline the diagnosis of CMD.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Angiographic assessment of coronary stenosis severity using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) is often inconsistent with that based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). We investigated the incidence of discrepancies between QCA and FFR or IVUS, and the outcomes of FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies in discordant coronary lesions. METHODS: This study was a post-hoc analysis of the FLAVOUR study. We used a QCA-derived diameter stenosis (DS) of 60% or greater, the highest tertile, to classify coronary lesions as concordant or discordant with FFR or IVUS criteria for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization at 24 months. RESULTS: The discordance rate between QCA and FFR or IVUS was 30.2% (n=551). The QCA-FFR discordance rate was numerically lower than the QCA-IVUS discordance rate (28.2% vs. 32.4%, p=0.050). In 200 patients with ≥60% DS, PCI was deferred according to negative FFR (n=141) and negative IVUS (n=59) (15.3% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001). The POCO incidence was comparable between the FFR- and IVUS-guided deferral strategies (5.9% vs. 3.4%, p=0.479). Conversely, 351 patients with DS <60% underwent PCI according to positive FFR (n=118) and positive IVUS (n=233) (12.8% vs. 25.9%, p<0.001). FFR- and IVUS-guided PCI did not differ in the incidence of POCO (9.5% vs. 6.5%, p=0.294). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of QCA-FFR or IVUS discordance was approximately one third for intermediate coronary lesions. FFR- or IVUS-guided strategies for these lesions were comparable with respect to POCO at 24 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02673424.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The clinical benefits of complete revascularization (CR) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients are unclear. Moreover, the benefit of CR is unknown in AMI with diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. We sought to compare the prognosis of CR and incomplete revascularization (IR) in patients with AMI and multivessel disease, according to the presence of DM. METHODS: A total of 2,150 AMI patients with multivessel coronary artery disease were analyzed. CR was defined based on the angiographic image. The primary endpoint of this study was the patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) defined as a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, and any revascularization within 3 years. RESULTS: Overall, 3-year POCO was significantly lower in patients receiving angiographic CR (985 patients, 45.8%) compared with IR (1,165 patients, 54.2%). When divided into subgroups according to the presence of DM, CR reduced 3-year clinical outcomes in the non-DM group but not in the DM group (POCO: 11.7% vs. 23.2%, p<0.001, any revascularization: 7.2% vs. 10.8%, p=0.024 in the non-DM group, POCO: 24.3% vs. 27.8%, p=0.295, any revascularization: 13.3% vs. 11.3%, p=0.448 in the DM group, for CR vs. IR). Multivariate analysis showed that CR significantly reduced 3-year POCO (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.75) only in the non-DM group. CONCLUSIONS: In AMI patients with multivessel disease, CR may have less clinical benefit in DM patients than in non-DM patients.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at increased risk of not only bleeding, but also ischaemic events. This study aimed to determine the long-term relative risk of ischaemic and bleeding events in HBR patients. METHODS: This study was a nationwide cohort study, based on the Korean National Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. Patients diagnosed with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome and those who underwent PCI in Korea between 2009 and 2018 were included in the analysis. According to the Academic Research Consortium HBR criteria, the total population was divided into HBR and non-HBR groups. The co-primary outcomes were major bleeding events and ischaemic (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischaemic stroke) events. RESULTS: Among a total of 325 417 patients who underwent PCI, 66 426 patients (20.4%) had HBR. During the follow-up period, HBR patients had a higher risk for major bleeding events (23.9% vs. 8.9%, P < .001) and ischaemic events (33.8% vs. 14.4%, P < .001). However, the impact of HBR was significant for major bleeding events [hazard ratio (HR) 3.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.04-3.21, P < .001] and for ischaemic events (HR 2.50, 95% CI 2.45-2.56, P < .001). The HBR group was also associated with a greater risk of all-cause mortality (HR 3.73, 95% CI 3.66-3.79, P < .001). The average annual rate of major bleeding events within the first year after PCI was 5.5% for a single major criterion, and 2.9% for a single minor criterion. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing PCI, those with HBR were at increased long-term risk for both bleeding and ischaemic events, with a greater risk of mortality compared to non-HBR patients.

RESUMEN

Importance: The associations between angiographic findings and post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) and their clinical relevance according to residual functional disease burden have not been thoroughly investigated. Objectives: To evaluate the association of angiographic and physiologic parameters according to residual functional disease burden after drug-eluting stent implantation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study population was from the International Post-PCI FFR registry, which incorporated 4 registries from Korea, China, and Japan. Patients who underwent angiographically successful second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation and post-PCI FFR measurement were included in the analysis. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the residual disease burden (post-PCI FFR ≤0.80 [residual ischemia], 0.81-0.86 [suboptimal], and >0.86 [optimal]). The data were collected from August 23, 2018, to June 11, 2019, and the current analysis was performed from January 11, 2022, to October 7, 2023. Exposures: Angiographic parameters and post-PCI FFR. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 2 years. Results: In this cohort of 2147 patients, the mean (SD) age was 64.3 (10.0) years, and 1644 patients (76.6%) were men. Based on the post-PCI physiologic status, 269 patients (12.5%) had residual ischemia, 551 (25.7%) had suboptimal results, and 1327 (61.8%) had optimal results. Angiographic parameters had poor correlations with post-PCI FFR (r < 0.20). Post-PCI FFR was isolated from all angiographic parameters in the unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis. Post-PCI FFR was associated with the occurrence of TVF (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] per post-PCI FFR 0.01 increase, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.92-0.97]; P < .001), but angiographic parameters were not. The residual ischemia group had a significantly higher rate of TVF than the suboptimal group (AHR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.08-2.83]; P = .02) and the optimal group (AHR, 2.94 [95% CI, 1.82-4.73]; P < .001). The TVR in the residual ischemia group was predominantly associated with TVR in the nonstented segment (14 [53.8%]), unlike the other 2 groups (3 [10.0%] in the suboptimal group and 13 [30.2%] in the optimal group). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of the International Post-PCI FFR registry, a low degree of associations were observed between angiographic and physiologic parameters after PCI. Post-PCI FFR, unlike angiographic parameters, was associated with clinical events and the distribution of clinical events. The current study supports the use of post-PCI FFR as a procedural quality metric and further prospective study is warranted.

Asunto(s)

Angiografía Coronaria , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico/fisiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Sistema de Registros , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Estudios de Cohortes , República de Corea , China/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Long-term follow-up is essential to evaluate the impact of polymer degradation in drug-eluting stents (DES). AIMS: We aimed to compare durable-polymer DES (DP-DES) and biodegradable-polymer DES (BP-DES) during a 3-year follow-up to evaluate the entire period of polymer resolution (before, during, and after degradation). METHODS: The HOST REDUCE POLYTECH RCT Trial was a randomised clinical trial enrolling patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and comparing the efficacy and safety of DP-DES and BP-DES. The primary outcome was a patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO), and the key secondary outcome was a device-oriented composite outcome (DOCO). RESULTS: A total of 3,413 ACS patients were randomised to either the DP-DES (1,713 patients) or BP-DES (1,700 patients) group. During the 3-year follow-up, the risk of the POCO was similar between the DP-DES and BP-DES groups (14.8% vs 15.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80-1.14; p=0.613). However, the risk of the DOCO was lower in the DP-DES group (6.0% vs 8.0%, HR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57-0.95; p=0.020). In a landmark analysis, the lower risk of the DOCO for the DP-DES group was evident during the transition from the early to the late period after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (from 8 to 16 months post-PCI; 1.8% vs 3.3%, HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.34-0.84; p=0.007), which was mainly driven by a risk reduction of target lesion revascularisation. CONCLUSIONS: In ACS patients, DP-DES showed similar results to BP-DES regarding the POCO up to 3 years. For the DOCO, DP-DES were superior to BP-DES; this was due to the higher event rate during the period of polymer degradation.

Asunto(s)

Implantes Absorbibles , Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Polímeros , Humanos , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Diseño de Prótesis , Factores de Tiempo

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The hyperaemic stenosis resistance (HSR) index was introduced to provide a more comprehensive indicator of the haemodynamic severity of a coronary lesion. HSR combines both the pressure drop across a lesion and the flow through it. As such, HSR overcomes the limitations of the more traditional fractional flow reserve (FFR) or coronary flow reserve (CFR) indices. AIMS: We aimed to identify the diagnostic and prognostic value of HSR and evaluate the clinical implications. METHODS: Patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) and obstructive coronary artery disease were selected from the multicentre ILIAS Registry. For this study, only patients with combined Doppler flow and pressure measurements were included. RESULTS: A total of 853 patients with 1,107 vessels were included. HSR more accurately identified the presence of inducible ischaemia compared to FFR and CFR (area under the curve 0.71 vs 0.66 and 0.62, respectively; p<0.005 for both). An abnormal HSR measurement was an independent and important predictor of target vessel failure at 5-year follow-up (hazard ratio 3.80, 95% confidence interval: 2.12-6.73; p<0.005). In vessels deferred from revascularisation, HSR seems to identify more accurately those vessels that may benefit from revascularisation rather than FFR and/or CFR. CONCLUSIONS: The present study affirms the theoretical advantages of the HSR index for the detection of ischaemia-Âinducing coronary lesions in a large CCS population. (Inclusive Invasive Physiological Assessment in Angina Syndromes Registry [ILIAS Registry], ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04485234).

Asunto(s)

Angina Estable , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Angina Estable/fisiopatología , Angina Estable/terapia , Angina Estable/diagnóstico , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico/fisiología , Estenosis Coronaria/fisiopatología , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico , Pronóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Resistencia Vascular/fisiología , Angiografía Coronaria

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is well-established for diagnosis and stratification of coronary artery disease (CAD). Its usefulness in guiding percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and stent sizing is unknown. METHODS: This is a sub-analysis of the Precise Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Plan (P3) study (NCT03782688). We analyzed 65 vessels with matched CCTA and pre-PCI optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessment. The CCTA-guided stent size was defined by the mean distal reference lumen diameter rounded up to the nearest stent diameter. The OCT lumen-guided stent size was the mean distal reference lumen diameter rounded to the closest stent diameter. The agreement on stent diameters was determined with Kappa statistics, Passing-Bablok regression analysis, and the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The distal reference lumen diameter by CCTA and OCT were 2.75 â€‹± â€‹0.53 â€‹mm and 2.72 â€‹± â€‹0.55 â€‹mm (mean difference 0.06, limits of agreement -0.7 to 0.82). There were no proportional or systematic differences (coefficient A 1.06, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.3 and coefficient B -0.22, 95% CI -0.83 to 0.36) between methods. The agreement between the CCTA and OCT stent size was substantial (Cohen's weighted Kappa 0.74, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.85). Compared to OCT stent diameter, CCTA stent size was concordant in 52.3% of the cases; CCTA overestimated stent size in 20.0% and underestimated in 27.7%. CONCLUSION: CCTA accurately assessed the reference vessel diameter used for stent sizing. CCTA-based stent sizing showed a substantial agreement with OCT. CCTA allows for PCI planning and may aid in selecting stent diameter.

Asunto(s)

Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Vasos Coronarios , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Diseño de Prótesis , Stents , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Humanos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Masculino , Femenino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A lesion-level risk prediction for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) needs better characterization. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the additive value of artificial intelligence-enabled quantitative coronary plaque and hemodynamic analysis (AI-QCPHA). METHODS: Among ACS patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) from 1 month to 3 years before the ACS event, culprit and nonculprit lesions on coronary CTA were adjudicated based on invasive coronary angiography. The primary endpoint was the predictability of the risk models for ACS culprit lesions. The reference model included the Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System, a standardized classification for stenosis severity, and high-risk plaque, defined as lesions with ≥2 adverse plaque characteristics. The new prediction model was the reference model plus AI-QCPHA features, selected by hierarchical clustering and information gain in the derivation cohort. The model performance was assessed in the validation cohort. RESULTS: Among 351 patients (age: 65.9 ± 11.7 years) with 2,088 nonculprit and 363 culprit lesions, the median interval from coronary CTA to ACS event was 375 days (Q1-Q3: 95-645 days), and 223 patients (63.5%) presented with myocardial infarction. In the derivation cohort (n = 243), the best AI-QCPHA features were fractional flow reserve across the lesion, plaque burden, total plaque volume, low-attenuation plaque volume, and averaged percent total myocardial blood flow. The addition of AI-QCPHA features showed higher predictability than the reference model in the validation cohort (n = 108) (AUC: 0.84 vs 0.78; P < 0.001). The additive value of AI-QCPHA features was consistent across different timepoints from coronary CTA. CONCLUSIONS: AI-enabled plaque and hemodynamic quantification enhanced the predictability for ACS culprit lesions over the conventional coronary CTA analysis. (Exploring the Mechanism of Plaque Rupture in Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Computational Fluid Dynamics II [EMERALD-II]; NCT03591328).

Asunto(s)

Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Inteligencia Artificial , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Placa Aterosclerótica , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/fisiopatología , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Circulación Coronaria , Vasos Coronarios/fisiopatología , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemodinámica , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Rotura Espontánea , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo

Asunto(s)

Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Vasos Coronarios , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Humanos , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an invasive standard method to identify ischemia-causing coronary artery disease (CAD). With the advancement of technology, FFR can be noninvasively computed from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Recently, a novel simpler method has been developed to calculate on-site CCTA-derived FFR (CT-FFR) with a commercially available workstation. METHODS: A total of 319 CAD patients who underwent CCTA, invasive coronary angiography, and FFR measurement were included. The primary outcome was the accuracy of CT-FFR for defining myocardial ischemia evaluated with an invasive FFR as a reference. The presence of ischemia was defined as FFR ≤0.80. Anatomical obstructive stenosis was defined as diameter stenosis on CCTA ≥50%, and the diagnostic performance of CT-FFR and CCTA stenosis for ischemia was compared. RESULTS: Among participants (mean age 64.7±9.4 years, male 77.7%), mean FFR was 0.82±0.10, and 126 (39.5%) patients had an invasive FFR value of ≤0.80. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CT-FFR were 80.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.5-80.7%), 88.1% (95% CI, 82.4-93.7%), 75.6% (95% CI, 69.6-81.7%), 70.3% (95% CI, 63.1-77.4%), and 90.7% (95% CI, 86.2-95.2%), respectively. CT-FFR had higher diagnostic accuracy (80.6% vs. 59.1%, p<0.001) and discriminant ability (area under the curve from receiver operating characteristic curve 0.86 vs. 0.64, p<0.001), compared with anatomical obstructive stenosis on CCTA. CONCLUSIONS: This novel CT-FFR obtained from an on-site workstation demonstrated clinically acceptable diagnostic performance and provided better diagnostic accuracy and discriminant ability for identifying hemodynamically significant lesions than CCTA alone.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of each third-generation drug-eluting stent with ultrathin struts and advanced polymer technology remain unclear. We investigated the clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention using the Coroflex ISAR polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) or Orsiro biodegradable polymer SES. METHODS: The HOST-IDEA trial (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis-Coronary Intervention With Next-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Platforms and Abbreviated Dual Antiplatelet Therapy), initially designed with a 2×2 factorial approach, sought to randomize patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention based on dual antiplatelet therapy duration (3 versus 12 months) and stent type (Coroflex ISAR versus Orsiro). Despite randomizing 2013 patients for dual antiplatelet therapy duration, the stent arm transitioned to a registry format during the trial. Among these, 328 individuals (16.3%) were randomized for Coroflex ISAR or Orsiro SES, while 1685 (83.7%) underwent percutaneous coronary intervention without stent-type randomization. In this study, the Coroflex ISAR (n=559) and Orsiro groups (n=1449) were matched using a propensity score. The prespecified primary end point was target lesion failure, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 12 months. RESULTS: The baseline patient and procedural characteristics were well balanced between the Coroflex ISAR and Orsiro groups after propensity score matching (n=559, each group). The Coroflex ISAR group was significantly associated with a higher rate of target lesion failure, mainly driven by clinically driven target lesion revascularization, compared with the Orsiro group (3.4% versus 1.1%; hazard ratio, 3.21 [95% CI, 1.28-8.05]; P=0.01). A higher risk of target lesion failure in the Coroflex ISAR group was consistently observed across various subgroups. The rates of any bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.51-1.40]; P=0.52) and major bleeding (hazard ratio, 1.58 [95% CI, 0.61-4.08]; P=0.34) were comparable between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this propensity score-matched analysis of the stent arm registry from the HOST-IDEA trial, the Orsiro SES was associated with significantly better outcomes in terms of 1-year target lesion failure, mainly driven by clinically driven target lesion revascularization, than the Coroflex ISAR SES. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02601157.

Asunto(s)

Implantes Absorbibles , Fármacos Cardiovasculares , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Polímeros , Diseño de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , Sirolimus , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Tiempo , Polímeros/química , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Medición de Riesgo , Estenosis Coronaria/terapia , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Coronaria/mortalidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología

Asunto(s)

Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Tiempo , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas

RESUMEN

Background: Both left ventricular systolic function and fractional flow reserve (FFR) are prognostic factors after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, how these prognostic factors are inter-related in risk stratification of patients after PCI remains unclarified. Objectives: This study evaluated differential prognostic implication of post-PCI FFR according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods: A total of 2,965 patients with available LVEF were selected from the POST-PCI FLOW (Prognostic Implications of Physiologic Investigation After Revascularization with Stent) international registry of patients with post-PCI FFR measurement. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death or target-vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI) at 2 years. The secondary outcome was target-vessel revascularization (TVR) and target vessel failure, which was a composite of cardiac death, TVMI, or TVR. Results: Post-PCI FFR was independently associated with the risk of target vessel failure (per 0.01 decrease: HRadj: 1.029; 95% CI: 1.009-1.049; P = 0.005). Post-PCI FFR was associated with increased risk of cardiac death or TVMI (HRadj: 1.145; 95% CI: 1.025-1.280; P = 0.017) among patients with LVEF ≤40%, and with that of TVR in patients with LVEF >40% (HRadj: 1.028; 95% CI: 1.005-1.052; P = 0.020). Post-PCI FFR ≤0.80 was associated with increased risk of cardiac death or TVMI in the LVEF ≤40% group and with that of TVR in LVEF >40% group. Prognostic impact of post-PCI FFR for the primary outcome was significantly different according to LVEF (Pinteraction = 0.019). Conclusions: Post-PCI FFR had differential prognostic impact according to LVEF. Residual ischemia by post-PCI FFR ≤0.80 was a prognostic indicator for cardiac death or TVMI among patients with patients with LVEF ≤40%, and it was associated with TVR among patients with patients with LVEF>40%. (Prognostic Implications of Physiologic Investigation After Revascularization with Stent [POST-PCI FLOW]; NCT04684043).