RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine which components from a multidomain assessment best predict protracted recovery in pediatric patients with a concussion. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort of patients aged 5-9 years who presented within 21 days of concussion to a specialty clinic were categorized into normal (≤30 days) and protracted (>30 days) recovery. Participants provided demographic and medical history information, and completed the Child Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5 symptom report and balance assessment, the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screen-Child (VOMS-C), and the Pediatric Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing. Univariate logistic regressions (LR) were used to inform a follow-up forward stepwise LR to identify the best predictors of protracted recovery. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the area under the curve (AUC) was used to identify which predictors retained from the LR model best discriminated recovery. RESULTS: The final sample included 68 patients (7.52 ± 2.3 years; 56% male), 36 (52.9%) with normal and 32 (47.1%) with protracted recovery. Results of the LR to identify protracted recovery were significant (P < .001) and accounted for 39% of the variance. The model accurately classified 78% of patients, with days to first clinic visit (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4; P = .003) and positive VOMS-C findings (OR, 8.32; 95% CI, 2.4-28.8; P < .001) as significant predictors. A receiver operating characteristic analysis of the AUC of this 2-factor model discriminated protracted from normal recovery (AUC, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.92; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Days to first clinic visit and positive findings on the VOMS-C were the most robust predictors of protracted recovery after concussion in young pediatric patients.
Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica , Recuperación de la Función , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Niño , Estudios Prospectivos , Preescolar , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Curva ROC , Modelos LogísticosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical utility of the Sports Concussion Assessment Tool-5 Child (Child SCAT5) in an outpatient specialty clinic sample of children aged 5-9 years. STUDY DESIGN: Ninety-six children within 30 days of a concussion (mean = 8.90 ± 5.78 days) and 43 age- and sex-matched healthy controls completed the Child SCAT5, including balance items, cognitive screening, parent and child symptom severity reports, as well as each individual parent- and child-rated symptom severity (0-3). A series of receiver operating characteristic curves with area under the curve (AUC) analysis were performed to evaluate the clinical utility of the Child SCAT5 components to discriminate concussion. RESULTS: The AUC values were nondiscriminate for cognitive screening (0.32) and poor for balance (0.61) items. The AUC values were acceptable for parent-reported symptoms worsening after physical activity (0.73) and mental activity (0.72). The AUCs for symptom severity items were excellent for parent (0.89) and child-reported (0.81) headaches, and were acceptable for parent-reported tired a lot (0.75) and both parent- (0.72) and child-reported (0.72) tired easily. CONCLUSION: With the exception of parent- and child-reported symptoms, the Child SCAT5 provides limited clinical utility for evaluating concussion in children aged 5-9 years seen at an outpatient concussion specialty clinic. The cognitive screening and balance testing items were not useful in discriminating concussion. Parent- and child-reported headache were the only Child SCAT5 items with excellent ability to differentiate concussion from controls in the age group.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Deportes , Humanos , Preescolar , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , CefaleaRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Multiple aspects of a multidomain assessment have been validated for identifying concussion; however, researchers have yet to determine which components are related to referral for vestibular therapy. OBJECTIVE: To identify which variables from a multidomain assessment were associated with receiving a referral for vestibular therapy after a concussion. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review, level of evidence 3. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Participants (n = 331; age = 16.9 ± 7.2 years; 39.3% female) were diagnosed with a concussion per international consensus criteria by a clinical neuropsychologist after presenting to a concussion specialty clinic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Medical chart data were extracted from the first clinical visit regarding preinjury medical history, computerized neurocognition, Post-Concussion Symptom Scale, Concussion Clinical Profiles Screen, and Vestibular Ocular Motor Screening within 16.2 ± 46.7 days of injury. We built 5 backwards logistic regression models to associate the outcomes from each of the 5 assessments with referral for vestibular therapy. A final logistic regression model was generated using variables retained in the previous 5 models as potential predictors of referral for vestibular therapy. RESULTS: The 5 models built from individual components of the multidomain assessment predicted referral for vestibular therapy (R2 = 0.01-0.28) with 1 to 6 statistically significant variables. The final multivariate model (R2 = 0.40) retained 9 significant variables, represented by each of the 5 multidomain assessments except neurocognition. Variables that had the strongest association with vestibular therapy referral were motor vehicle accident mechanism of injury (odds ratio [OR] = 15.45), migraine history (OR = 3.25), increased headache when concentrating (OR = 1.81), and horizontal vestibular ocular reflex (OR = 1.63). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the utility of a multidomain assessment and identified outcomes associated with a referral for vestibular therapy after a concussion.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Síndrome Posconmocional , Humanos , Femenino , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/terapia , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Síndrome Posconmocional/diagnóstico , Derivación y ConsultaRESUMEN
CONTEXT: In 2018, the US military developed the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation-2 (MACE-2) to inform the acute evaluation of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). However, researchers have yet to investigate false-positive rates for components of the MACE-2, including the Vestibular-Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) and modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS), in military personnel. OBJECTIVE: To examine factors associated with false-positive results on the VOMS and mBESS in US Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) personnel. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Military medical clinic. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 416 healthy USASOC personnel completed the medical history, VOMS, and mBESS evaluations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): False-positive rates for the VOMS (≥2 on VOMS symptom items, >5 cm for near point of convergence [NPC] distance) and mBESS (total score >4) were determined using χ2 analyses and independent-samples t tests. Multivariable logistic regressions (LRs) with adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were performed to identify risk factors for false-positive results on the VOMS and mBESS. The VOMS item false-positive rates ranged from 10.6% (smooth pursuits) to 17.5% (NPC). The mBESS total score false-positive rate was 36.5%. RESULTS: The multivariable LR model supported 3 significant predictors of VOMS false-positives, age (aOR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.02, 1.12; P = .007), migraine history (aOR = 2.49; 95% CI = 1.29, 4.81; P = .007), and motion sickness history (aOR = 2.46; 95% CI = 1.34, 4.50; P = .004). Only a history of motion sickness was a significant predictor of mBESS false-positive findings (aOR = 2.34; 95% CI = 1.34, 4.05; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: False-positive rates across VOMS items were low and associated with age and a history of mTBI, migraine, or motion sickness. False-positive results for the mBESS total score were higher (36.5%) and associated only with a history of motion sickness. These risk factors for false-positive findings should be considered when administering and interpreting VOMS and mBESS components of the MACE-2 in this population.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Trastornos Migrañosos , Personal Militar , Mareo por Movimiento , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate temporal differences in concussion symptoms up to 30 days following a sports-related concussion. STUDY DESIGN: Adolescent and young adult athletes (n = 782) were separated based on time since injury at presentation as Early (0-7 days; n = 321, age: 15.4 ± 1.9 years, 51.7% female), Middle (8-14 days; n = 281, age: 15.8 ± 2.2 years, 54.8% female), and Late (15-30 days; n = 180, age: 15.6 ± 1.8 years, 52.8% female). All participants completed the 22-item Post-Concussion Symptom Scale at first visit. A confirmatory factor analysis was completed separately for each time since injury cohort using a 4-component model reported previously. RESULTS: The confirmatory factor analysis model fit was acceptable for Early, Middle, and Late (using cognitive-migraine-fatigue, affective, sleep, and somatic factors). Both affective (change = 0.30; P = .01; Cohen d = 0.30) and sleep (change = 0.51; P ≤ .001; Cohen d = 0.47) factors were significantly greater in the Late group compared with the Early, but not Middle, groups. The previously reported 4-factor symptom model, including cognitive-migraine-fatigue, affective, somatic, and sleep factors, was appropriate for adolescents up to 30 days' postinjury. However, adolescents who presented between 15 and 30 days' postinjury reported greater affective and sleep symptoms than those who presented within 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should consider these temporal differences when evaluating concussion symptoms in adolescents, as greater affective and sleep symptoms can be predictive of prolonged recovery/persistent complications.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Trastornos Migrañosos , Síndrome Posconmocional , Adolescente , Traumatismos en Atletas/complicaciones , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Fatiga/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Síndrome Posconmocional/complicaciones , Síndrome Posconmocional/diagnóstico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of a 4-week precision vestibular rehabilitation intervention compared with a behavioral management control intervention for adolescents with vestibular symptoms/impairment within 21 days of a concussion. STUDY DESIGN: This study used double-blind, randomized controlled trial design involving adolescent (12-18 years) patients with a diagnosed sport/recreation-related concussion with vestibular symptoms/impairment from a concussion-specialty clinic between October 2018 and February 2020. Eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 to either a 4-week vestibular intervention group (VESTIB) or a behavioral management control group (CONTROL). CONTROLS (n = 25) were prescribed behavioral management strategies (eg, physical activity, sleep, hydration, nutrition, stress management) and instructed to perform stretching/physical activity (eg, walking, stationary cycle) 30 minutes/day. VESTIB (n = 25) were prescribed precision vestibular rehabilitation exercises and instructed to perform at-home exercises for 30 minutes/day. Primary outcomes were improvement in Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening vestibular items (ie, horizontal/vertical vestibular-ocular reflex, visual motion sensitivity) at 4 weeks postenrollment. RESULTS: We screened 310 and enrolled a total of 55 (18%) adolescent patients who were randomized to one of the interventions. Fifty of fifty-five (91%) participants completed all aspects of the study protocol. Participants in VESTIB improved significantly across the intervention period in horizontal (mean difference-1.628; 95% CI [-3.20, -0.06]; P = .04) and vertical (mean difference-2.24; 95% CI [-4.01, -0.48]; P = .01) vestibular-ocular reflex, but not visual motion sensitivity (mean difference-2.03; 95% CI [-4.26, 0.19]) of the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening score compared with CONTROLS. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the vestibular intervention group experienced greater clinical improvements in vestibular symptoms/impairment than controls across the 4-week intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03555370.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas/complicaciones , Terapia Conductista/métodos , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Enfermedades Vestibulares/rehabilitación , Adolescente , Niño , Terapia Combinada , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vestibulares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Vestibulares/etiologíaRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Research into sport-related concussion (SRC) has grown substantially over the past decade, yet no authors to date have synthesized developments over this critical time period. OBJECTIVE: To apply a network-analysis approach in evaluating trends in the SRC literature using a comprehensive search of original, peer-reviewed research articles involving human participants published between January 1, 2010, and December 15, 2019. DESIGN: Narrative review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Bibliometric maps were derived from a comprehensive search of all published, peer-reviewed SRC articles in the Web of Science database. A clustering algorithm was used to evaluate associations among journals, organizations or institutions, authors, and key words. The online search yielded 6130 articles, 528 journals, 7598 authors, 1966 organizations, and 3293 key words. RESULTS: The analysis supported 5 thematic clusters of journals: (1) biomechanics/sports medicine (n = 15), (2) pediatrics/rehabilitation (n = 15), (3) neurotrauma/neurology/neurosurgery (n = 11), (4) general sports medicine (n = 11), and (5) neuropsychology (n = 7). The analysis identified 4 organizational clusters of hub institutions: (1) University of North Carolina (n = 19), (2) University of Toronto (n = 19), (3) University of Michigan (n = 11), and (4) University of Pittsburgh (n = 10). Network analysis revealed 8 clusters for SRC key words, each with a central topic area: (1) epidemiology (n = 14), (2) rehabilitation (n = 12), (3) biomechanics (n = 11), (4) imaging (n = 10), (5) assessment (n = 9), (6) mental health/chronic traumatic encephalopathy (n = 9), (7) neurocognition (n = 8), and (8) symptoms/impairments (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that during the past decade SRC research has (1) been published primarily in sports medicine, pediatric, and neuro-focused journals, (2) involved a select group of researchers from several key institutions, and (3) concentrated on new topical areas, including treatment or rehabilitation and mental health.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare VOMS item scores between a fixed and randomized administration order in a sample of nonconcussed high school athletes. DESIGN: Post-test only, quasi-experimental design. SETTING: Local high schools in a mid-west region of the United States. PATIENTS: Fifty nonconcussed high school athletes (M = 15.64; SD = 1.12 years) completed the VOMS in a randomized testing order (RANDOM), and 49 (M = 15.64; SD = 1.12 years) completed the VOMS in the fixed testing order (FIXED). The groups were matched on age, sex, learning disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, concussion history, and baseline concussion symptoms. INTERVENTIONS: The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool comprises pretest symptoms, smooth pursuit (SP), horizontal/vertical saccade (HSAC/VSAC), average near-point of convergence (NPC) distance, convergence symptoms, horizontal/vertical vestibular ocular reflex (HVOR/VVOR), and visual motion sensitivity (VMS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to examine differences between FIXED and RANDOM groups on VOMS items. RANDOM scores were rearranged in order of administration and combined with the FIXED group scores, and a Freidman test was performed for repeated measures. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between FIXED and RANDOM groups on VOMS pretest symptoms (U = 1171, P = 0.57), SP (U = 1122.5, P = 0.35), HSAC (U = 1128.5, P = 0.44), VSAC (U = 1055.5, P = 0.16), convergence symptoms (U = 1129.0, P = 0.41), average NPC distance (U = 979.0, P = 0.06), HVOR (U = 1085.0, P = 0.25), VVOR (U = 1126.0, P = 0.41), and VMS scores (U = 1101.0, P = 0.32). When VOMS items were rearranged and the sample was combined, there were no differences for repeated measures [χ2 (6) = 9.92, P = 0.13]. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences on VOMS items between FIXED and RANDOM groups for repeated measures. The testing order of VOMS items does not affect VOMS scores in nonconcussed high school athletes.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Neurológico , Adolescente , Atletas , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Humanos , Instituciones AcadémicasRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Increased near point of convergence (NPC) distance is a common finding after concussion and is associated with physical symptoms and worsened neurocognitive performance. Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening measures NPC distance across 3 trials and uses the average measurement to inform clinical care. However, whether 3 trials are necessary, are consistent, or add clinical utility is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the consistency across 3 trials of NPC and establish the classification accuracy (ie, clinical utility) of 1 or 2 trials compared with the standardized average of 3 trials. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Sports medicine clinic and research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Consecutively enrolled patients aged 10 to 22 years with diagnosed concussions (74% sport related; n = 380). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The previously reported clinical cutoff value of ≥5 cm across 3 trials was used. Pearson correlation and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to evaluate agreement between trials and average scores. Reliable change indices (RCIs) using 95% confidence intervals were also calculated. RESULTS: The Pearson correlation (r = .98) and intraclass correlation (0.98) coefficients revealed excellent agreement between the first measurement and average NPC distance across 3 measurements. The RCI across all trials was 2 cm. When the first NPC measurement was ≤3 cm or ≥7 cm, agreement existed within the RCI between the first measurement and the average of 3 measurements in 99.6% of cases. When we averaged the first and second measurements, 379/380 (99.7%) participants had the same classification (ie, <5 cm = normal, ≥5 cm = abnormal) as the average NPC distance across 3 measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest limited utility of multiple or average NPC distance measurements when the initial NPC distance is outside of RCI clinical cutoffs (ie, ≤3 cm or ≥7 cm). Given the high consistency between the first measurement and average NPC distance across 3 trials, only 1 measurement of NPC distance is warranted unless the first measurement is between 3 and 7 cm.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica , Convergencia Ocular/fisiología , Desempeño Psicomotor/fisiología , Adolescente , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/etiología , Conmoción Encefálica/fisiopatología , Conmoción Encefálica/psicología , Niño , Cognición , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Rendimiento Físico Funcional , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pruebas de Función Vestibular , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Sport-related concussion (SRC) is a heterogeneous injury that involves varied symptoms and impairment that presents a significant clinical challenge to sports medicine professionals. In response to this challenge, clinical researchers have proposed clinical profiles or subtype models for assessing and treating athletes with SRC. One such model emphasizes five concussion clinical profiles including cognitive/fatigue, vestibular, ocular, migraine, and anxiety/mood. Sleep is a common modifier that co-occurs across these clinical profiles. A combination of medical history, risk factors, injury information, clinical characteristics, and assessment outcomes can inform each clinical profile. Preliminary data involving 236 patients from a concussion specialty clinic indicate that the migraine (26%) and anxiety/mood (24%) profiles are the most common, with vestibular and ocular profiles combined representing more than one third (35%) of clinical profiles. Findings also support several relationships among different clinical profiles including vestibular and migraine, suggesting that many athletes present with multiple clinical profiles. Targeted, active treatments for each profile are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Traumatismos en Atletas/complicaciones , Traumatismos en Atletas/terapia , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica/terapia , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sueño , Medicina DeportivaRESUMEN
Concussions are common in military personnel and may result in increased risk of musculoskeletal injury. One plausible explanation for this risk could be that neuromotor deficiencies enhance injury risk after a concussion through altered muscular activation/contraction timing. PURPOSE: To compare military personnel with at least one concussion during the past 1 month to 2 yr (CONCUSSED) to military branch-matched, age-matched, and Special Operations Forces group-matched controls (CONTROL) on physiological, musculoskeletal, and biomechanical performance. METHODS: A total of 48 (24 CONCUSSED, 24 CONTROL) male Air Force and Naval Special Warfare Operators age 19 to 34 yr participated in the study. Participants self-reported demographics/injury history and completed the following assessments: 1) physiological-body composition, anaerobic power and capacity, aerobic capacity and lactate threshold; 2) musculoskeletal-lower extremity isokinetic strength testing, including time to peak torque; and 3) biomechanical-single-leg jump and landing task, including landing kinematics of the hip, knee and ankle. A machine learning decision tree algorithm (C5.0) and one-way ANOVA were used to compare the two groups on these outcomes. RESULTS: Despite nonsignificant differences using ANOVA, the C5.0 algorithm revealed CONCUSSED demonstrated quicker time to peak knee flexion angle during the single-leg landing task (≤0.170 s; CONCUSSED: n = 22 vs CONTROL: n = 14), longer time to peak torque in knee extension isokinetic strength testing (>500 ms; CONCUSSED: n = 18 vs CONTROL: n = 4) and larger knee flexion angle at initial contact (>7.7°; CONCUSSED: n = 18 vs CONTROL: n = 2). CONCLUSION: The findings supported the hypothesis that CONCUSSED military personnel would demonstrate altered neuromuscular control in landing strategies and muscular activation. Future research should assess prospectively neuromuscular changes after a concussion and determine if these changes increase risk of subsequent musculoskeletal injuries.
Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica/fisiopatología , Personal Militar , Músculo Esquelético/fisiopatología , Adulto , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Composición Corporal , Árboles de Decisión , Humanos , Ácido Láctico/sangre , Extremidad Inferior/fisiología , Aprendizaje Automático , Masculino , Contracción Muscular , Fuerza Muscular/fisiología , Músculo Esquelético/lesiones , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Targeted Evaluation Action and Monitoring of Traumatic Brain Injury (TEAM-TBI) is a monitored, multiple interventional research identifying clinical profiles and assigns individualized, evidence-based treatment program. The objective of the current study was to assess overall participant satisfaction of the multi-disciplinary care team and approach. METHODS: Between 2014 and 2017, 90 participants completed the 4-day TEAM-TBI clinical intake evaluation resulting in individualized treatment recommendations followed by a six-month intervention phase follow-up. Inclusion criteria were: age 18-60, history of chronic TBI (>6 months post-injury) with refractory clinical sequelae at screening (Post-Concussion Symptom Scale [PCSS] score >30). RESULTS: A total of 85/90 (94%) participants completed the survey at baseline focusing on intake evaluation and approach; 90% of eligible participants also completed the follow-up time-point. Hundred percent of participants had a mean score of >4 across all questions at the initial time point." CONCLUSIONS: The multi-disciplinary care approach and individualized treatment plans of the TEAM-TBI study yielded high participant retention and satisfaction scores. The Clinical Coach component of the trial was one of the highest rated aspects of the program and was associated with participant motivation and high retention rates.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Selección de Paciente , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Sujetos de Investigación/psicología , Adulto , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/normas , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfacción Personal , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Sujetos de Investigación/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Concussion can cause vestibular dysfunction and oculomotor abnormalities which can lead to dizziness and protracted recovery time. There are few clinically useful, functional measures of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) post-concussion. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the gaze stabilization test (GST) in those referred for vestibular physical therapy following concussion, to determine the association between GST and other measures of recovery following concussion, and to examine the effect of demographic variables on GST performance. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. STUDY SAMPLE: One hundred fifty-eight individuals who sustained a concussion and were referred to vestibular physical therapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Horizontal and vertical GST scores (HGST and VGST), neurocognitive testing results, and demographic data were extracted retrospectively from the patient health record. Correlations between GST velocity and neurocognitive test results and between GST and patient-reported outcomes were examined. Differences in GST performance among patient subgroups were examined using one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: Subjects included individuals aged 12 to 43 years (mean = 20, standard deviation [SD] = 7), with most having sport-related concussion (67%). The mean time from injury to GST was 215 days (SD = 241) and the mean time from physical therapy evaluation to GST was 48 days (SD = 54). HGST and VGST had a weak positive correlation to the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (r = 0.20, r = 0.21) and weak negative correlation to the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (r = -0.18, r = -0.22). HGST had a weak positive correlation to the visual motor processing speed domain of the immediate post-concussion assessment and cognitive test (r = 0.20). Male patients achieved significantly higher velocities than female patients on HGST and VGST (p = 0.02, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The present study details the use of GST in patients with concussion and demonstrates an association with common outcome measures in vestibular rehabilitation. Results indicate that patients who achieved higher velocities on GST perceived lower handicap due to dizziness and had higher confidence in their balance. GST may be a relevant test of VOR in this population, as it is a more functional test of the VOR required for sports. Future work is needed to further evaluate the role of GST in concussion management.
RESUMEN
CONTEXT: Comprehensive, multidomain assessment is the standard of care after sport-related concussion. However, the relationship between performance on sideline concussion-assessment tools and in-office computerized neurocognitive testing has received little attention, and the prognostic utility of sideline measures is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate concurrent impairment on commonly used concussion measures 24 to 48 hours postinjury while also determining the predictive utility of sideline measures on computerized neurocognitive testing in the acute to subacute recovery periods postinjury. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: High school and collegiate athletics. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 125 high school and college-aged athletes (85 males, 40 females) 14 to 23 (16.8 ± 2.21) years old. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Participants were administered sideline concussion-assessment measures (ie, Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing [ImPACT], Standardized Assessment of Concussion [SAC], and Balance Error Scoring System [BESS]) 24 to 48 hours postinjury and completed ImPACT and the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale 5 to 7 and 10 to 14 days postinjury. Outcome measures were the ImPACT composite (verbal memory, visual memory, reaction time, visual-motor speed), SAC, and BESS scores and total symptom score on the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale. RESULTS: Participants demonstrated heterogeneous patterns of impairment on measures 24 to 48 hours postinjury, with the most common pattern being impairment on ImPACT and the SAC. Performance on the SAC and BESS at 24 to 48 hours after injury did not distinguish between those with and those without impairment on ImPACT at 5 to 7 days postinjury (χ2 = 5.076, P = .079) or 10 to 14 days postinjury (χ2 = 2.04, P = .361). CONCLUSIONS: More than 90% of athletes were impaired on at least 1 sideline or neurocognitive measure 24 to 48 hours after sport-related concussion. Although sideline measures are useful for concussion diagnosis, they are not suitable for prognostication of impairment or the presence of symptoms 1 to 2 weeks postinjury.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Conocimiento/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/diagnóstico , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/etiología , Síndrome Posconmocional/diagnóstico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if patients with signs of injury respond differently to prescribed rest after concussion compared with patients with symptoms only. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis was completed of a prospective randomized controlled trial (NCT01101724) of pediatric concussion patients aged 11-18 years. Patients completed computerized neurocognitive testing and standardized balance assessment at the emergency department within 24 hours of injury and on follow-up (3 and 10 days). Patients were randomized to rest or usual care and completed activity and symptom diaries for 10 days after injury. A series of 2?×?2 ANOVAs with grouping factors of patient group (symptoms, signs) and treatment arm (prescribed rest, standard of care) were used to examine differences on clinical measures. Univariate nonparametric test (ie, ?2 with ORs and 95% CIs) was used to examine the association between treatment arm and symptom status 1-9 days after injury. RESULTS: A 2?×?2 factorial ANOVA revealed a significant patient group × treatment arm interaction for symptom score at 3 days after injury (F?=?6.31, P?=?.01, ?2?=?0.07). Prescribed rest increased the likelihood of still being symptomatic at days 1-6 and 8 (P?.05) for the symptoms group. Rest was beneficial for patients in the signs group on verbal memory performance (t?=??2.28, P?=?.029), but not for the symptoms group. CONCLUSION: Compared with patients with signs of injury, patients with predominantly symptoms were more likely to remain symptomatic after injury if prescribed rest, whereas patients with signs of injury benefited from rest after a concussion. Individualized treatment planning after concussion should start in the emergency department. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01101724.
Asunto(s)
Reposo en Cama , Conmoción Encefálica/terapia , Síndrome Posconmocional/prevención & control , Adolescente , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Memoria , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Síndrome Posconmocional/diagnóstico , Equilibrio Postural , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la FunciónRESUMEN
Investigators from The Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC) Concussion Team developed a clinical risk score for predicting persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCS) at 28 days post injury in a large cohort of children initially evaluated at the emergency department (ED) within 48 hours of injury.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between a history of somatization and prolonged concussion symptoms, including sex differences in recovery. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of 10- to 18-year-olds with an acute concussion was conducted from July 2014 to April 2015 at a tertiary care pediatric emergency department. One hundred twenty subjects completed the validated Children's Somatization Inventory (CSI) for pre-injury somatization assessment and Postconcussion Symptoms Scale (PCSS) at diagnosis. PCSS was re-assessed by phone at 2 and 4 weeks. CSI was assessed in quartiles with a generalized estimating equation model to determine relationship of CSI to PCSS over time. RESULTS: The median age of our study participants was 13.8 years (IQR 11.5, 15.8), 60% male, with separate analyses for each sex. Our model showed a positive interaction between total CSI score, PCSS and time from concussion for females P < .01, and a statistical trend for males, P = .058. Females in the highest quartile of somatization had higher PCSS than the other 3 CSI quartiles at each time point (B -26.7 to -41.1, P values <.015). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with higher pre-injury somatization had higher concussion symptom scores over time. Females in the highest somatization quartile had prolonged concussion recovery with persistently high symptom scores at 4 weeks. Somatization may contribute to sex differences in recovery, and assessment at the time of concussion may help guide management and target therapy.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Posconmocional/psicología , Recuperación de la Función , Trastornos Somatomorfos/complicaciones , Trastornos Somatomorfos/psicología , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Síndrome Posconmocional/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of concussion among youth football players (ages 8-12 years). STUDY DESIGN: Participants included 468 male youth football players in western Pennsylvania during the 2011 youth football season. Incidence rates (IRs) and incidence density ratios (IDRs) of concussion were calculated for games and practices and for age groups. RESULTS: There was a total of 11,338 (8415 practice and 2923 game) athletic exposures (AEs) in the study period, during which 20 medically diagnosed concussions occurred. A majority of concussions were the result of head-to-head (45%) contact. The combined concussion IR for practices and games was 1.76 per 1000 AEs (95% CI 0.99-2.54). The concussion IR was 0.24 per 1000 AEs (95% CI 0.04-0.79) in practices and 6.16 per 1000 AEs (95% CI 3.76-9.54) in games. The IDR for concussions in games to practices was 25.91 (95% CI 6.01-111.70). The IDR of concussions for youth aged 11-12 years compared with youth aged 8-10 years was 2.72 (95% CI 0.66-4.78). CONCLUSIONS: The overall IR for concussion in youth football players aged 8-12 years was comparable with that reported previously for high school and collegiate samples. However, participation in games was associated with an increase in risk of concussion compared with practices, which was higher than rates previously reported for high school and collegiate athletes. Younger players were slightly less likely to incur a concussion than were older players.
Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica/epidemiología , Fútbol Americano/lesiones , Factores de Edad , Conmoción Encefálica/etiología , Niño , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Pennsylvania/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of overweight and obesity among participants in youth American football 9 to 14 years of age. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, 653 boys, 8.7 to 14.6 years. Height and weight were measured; body mass index (BMI) was calculated. Overweight and obesity were defined by international (International Obesity Task Force [IOTF]) and United States (Centers for Disease Control [CDC]) criteria. Prevalence and 95% confidence interval were calculated. Player age, height, and weight and midparent height were used to predict mature height; current height was expressed as a percentage of predicted mature height as an estimate of maturity status. RESULTS: Overall 45.0% (41.2% to 48.9%) and 42.6% (38.8% to 46.5%) of players were overweight or obese by CDC and IOTF criteria, respectively. Prevalence was highest in early maturing boys. Based on position-activity at time of injury (n = 180), overweight and obesity were more common among offensive and defensive linemen. CONCLUSION: Overweight and obesity were more prevalent in youth football players than in national samples of American boys. Allowing for limitations of the BMI and the relative stability of the BMI from adolescence into adulthood, a relatively large number of football participants may be at risk for later overweight or obesity, and the risk appears to be greater for offensive and defensive line positions.