RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The prevention of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) transmission in the healthcare setting is a priority in Infection Control practices. A cornerstone of this policy is contact tracing of nosocomial contacts after an unexpected MRSA finding. The objective of this retrospective study was to quantify the rates of MRSA transmission in different clinical settings. METHODS: This multi-centre study included MRSA contact screening results from two regional hospitals and one academic hospital. MRSA contact tracing investigations from 2000 until 2019 were reviewed and post-contact screening results were included of index patients with an MRSA-positive culture and their unprotected contacts. Available typing results were used to rule out incidental findings. RESULTS: Of 27,377 contacts screened after MRSA exposure, 21,488 were Health Care Workers (HCW) and 4816 patients. Post-contact screening was initiated for a total of 774 index cases, the average number of screened contacts per index case was 35.7 (range 1 to 640). MRSA transmission was observed in 0.15% (41) of the contacts, 19 (0.09%) HCW and 22 (0.46%) patients. The number needed to screen to detect one MRSA transmission was 667. The highest risk of MRSA transmission occurred during patient-to-patient contacts, with transmission rates varying from 0.32 to 1.32% among the participating hospitals. No transmissions were detected in HCW (n=2834) in the outpatient setting, and the rate of transmissions among HCW contacts on the wards was 0.13% (19 of 15,874). Among 344 contacts of patients with contact precautions, no transmissions were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Reconsidering current MRSA contact tracing practices may lead to a more targeted approach with a lower number needed to screen.
Asunto(s)
Trazado de Contacto , Infección Hospitalaria , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/transmisión , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Personal de Salud , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Anciano , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Objectives: While Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA), defined as CC398, is a well-known pathogen among those working with livestock, there are indications that LA-MRSA prevalence among the general population is increasing. However, the clinical impact in urban areas remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the genetic epidemiology and clinical characteristics of LA-MRSA in an urban area with a limited livestock population. Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated LA-MRSA strains that were collected between 2014 and 2018 from patients who received clinical care in a single urban area in Netherlands. Patient files were assessed for livestock exposure data, clinical findings, and contact tracing information. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis in combination with wgMLST was conducted to assess genetic diversity and relatedness and to detect virulence and resistance genes. Results: LA-MRSA strains were cultured from 81 patients, comprising 12% of all the MRSA strains found in seven study laboratories between 2014 and 2018. No livestock link was found in 76% of patients (n = 61), and 28% of patients (n = 23) had an infection, mostly of the skin or soft tissue. Contact tracing had been initiated in 14 cases, leading to the identification of two hospital transmissions: a cluster of 9 cases and one of 2 cases. NGS data were available for 91% (n = 75) of the patients. wgMLST confirmed the clusters detected via contact tracing (n = 2) and identified 5 additional clusters without a known epidemiological link. Relevant resistance and virulence findings included the PVL virulence gene (3 isolates) and tetracycline resistance (79 isolates). Conclusion: LA-MRSA may cause a relevant burden of disease in urban areas. Surprisingly, most infections in the present study occurred in the absence of a livestock link, suggesting inter-human transmission. These findings and the presence of PVL and other immune evasive complex virulence genes warrant future surveillance and preventative measures.
RESUMEN
Introduction. Staphylococcus aureus is a major cause of hospital infections worldwide. Awareness towards methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections is high but attention towards borderline oxacillin-resistant S. aureus (BORSA) is limited, possibly due to an underestimated clinical relevance, presumption of low incidence and diagnostic limitations.Gap statement. BORSA surveillance has not been routinely implemented, and thus consensus with regard to a definition and infection control measures is lacking.Aim. Our goals were to investigate the occurrence, molecular characteristics and clinical manifestations of BORSA infections in the hospital setting.Methodology. Following an increased incidence in 2016, BORSA cases in 2014/2016 (in our institution) were more specifically evaluated. Medical records were reviewed to investigate epidemiological links, clinical characteristics and outcomes. Resistance and virulence markers were assessed by whole genome sequencing (WGS). Conventional methods: amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) ; multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multiple locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) were compared with core genome MLST (cgMLST) and whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism (wgSNP) analysis to confirm genetic clusters.Results. From 2009 to 2013, BORSA comprised 0.1â% of all clinical S. aureus strains. In 2016, the incidence was six-fold higher in comparison to the baseline. Whole-genome SNP and cgMLST confirmed two BORSA clusters among patients with dermatological conditions. Patients with BORSA presented with skin infections, and one case developed a severe invasive infection with a fatal outcome. Infection control measures successfully prevented further transmission in both clusters. WGS findings showed that BORSA strains carried multiple resistance and virulence genes with increased pathogenic potential.Conclusion. WGS and cgMLST effectively characterized and confirmed BORSA clusters among at-risk patients with clinical manifestations ranging from mild skin infections to life-threatening bacteraemia. Clinical awareness and active monitoring are therefore warranted for the timely implementation of infection control measures to prevent BORSA transmission in high-risk patients.