RESUMEN
In this retrospective study, we analysed clinical and demographic data from the medical records of 31 pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who were treated at our hospital between April 2020 and April 2021. The most common symptom was a fever; â¼10% of patients were asymptomatic. One patient with rapidly worsening pneumonia needed a Caesarean Section at 30 weeks and was admitted for intensive care. Twelve patients received perinatal care in our hospital (10 live births, one stillbirth, and one artificial abortion). Six patients delivered vaginally; the others delivered via caesarean section. Two patients had complications, including severe hypertensive disorders and preeclampsia. All patients recovered from COVID-19. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was not detected in the placenta, umbilical cord, cord blood, amniotic fluid, vaginal fluid, or breast milk in any patient. There were no neonatal adverse outcomes. The possibility of transmitting the coronavirus to pregnancy-related samples was low.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on the subject? COVID-19 has been affecting different countries in diverse ways, and the incidence, mortality, and morbidity rates of patients with COVID-19 vary widely by country or region and race. These differences in results may reflect racial differences and differences in national health care systems. Moreover, the information about the perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19 and their newborns from Japan is limited.What do the results of this study add to what is known? We described the perinatal outcomes of 31 Japanese pregnant women with COVID-19 who were managed safely in a perinatal medical centre in Tokyo Japan, during the first 1 year of the pandemic.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Severe pneumonia and perinatal complications may occur, although no maternal and neonatal deaths were observed for COVID-19-positive pregnant women in our facility. Therefore, it is important to prevent this infection during pregnancy with the provision of effective medical care.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Femenino , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cesárea , Mujeres Embarazadas , Pandemias , Japón/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/terapia , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Mortinato/epidemiología , Hospitales , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad InfecciosaRESUMEN
AIM: To confirm that variations in cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) are indicators of external placental damage, we quantitatively investigated cffDNA alterations in maternal peripheral blood during external cephalic version (ECV). METHODS: We recruited 48 singleton pregnant women who underwent ECV in our hospital. Before and immediately after ECV, we harvested 10 ml of maternal peripheral blood samples for cffDNA analysis. cffDNA alterations were assessed based on the fetal fraction (FF) rate. We performed ECV without epidural anesthesia but administered epidural anesthesia if ECV was disrupted due to severe pain. RESULTS: The FF increased from 22.9% ± 5.7% to 27.0% ± 5.7% (p < 0.05) after ECV. The FF increased in both successful (before, 24.4% ± 5.9%; after, 28.1% ± 5.9%; p < 0.05) and unsuccessful (before, 21.8% ± 3.8%; after, 27.3% ± 4.2%; p < 0.05) cases, as well as in patients who received epidural anesthesia (before, 23.9% ± 4.7%; after, 28.5% ± 4.4%; p < 0.05) or underwent ECV more than once (before, 23.5% ± 6.1%; after, 28.4% ± 5.3%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FF alterations increased due to external stresses during ECV; the alterations were markedly greater when the strength and duration of external stress increased. These FF alterations may serve as potential biomarkers for the direct assessment of placental damage.