RESUMEN
AIM: To study barriers made by the patients for adequate treatment of arterial hypertension. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The ARGUS-2 trial was made in 15 centers of 13 cities of Russia. Anonymous questionnaire survey covered 1298 patients (796 outpatients and 502 inpatients). The patients answered the following questions: 1) what are basic problems of life with hypertension; 2) compliance with intake of antihypertensive drugs; 3) causes of missed intakes of the drugs; 4) opposition to intake of drugs by the patients. Questioning procedure was preset by the trial protocol. RESULTS: Only 37.4% (38.9% outpatients, 34.6% inpatients) were the treatment adopters. Drug intake was missed most frequently because offorgetting. The problems of life with hypertension were differently interpreted by patients and physicians: for the latter main problems were financial and routine while AH complications were on the 6-7 place. The latter were of primary importance for the patients while financial problems took place 4-6 Barriers to regular intake for the patients were poor self-control and unawareness about side effects of the drugs. CONCLUSION: Complience of the patient can be improved only by complex approach: improvement of education, higher motivation, active involvement of patients into the treatment process, better contacts between the physician and the patient.
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/psicología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios de Validación como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To study the problems of physician-patient cooperation, patient- and physician related barrieres to target blood pressure (BP) achievement and to demonstrate improvement of BP control with indapamide SR 1.5 mg, when given to patients remaining uncontrolled while receiving antihypertensive therapy without thiazide diuretics (TD). METHODS: The trial Improvement of Arterial Hypertension Control in High-Risk Hypertensive Patients (ARGUS-2) run in 15 Russian centres during the year 2006. Retrospective analysis of medical notes of 684 outpatients and 575 inpatients with arterial hypertension. Validated questionnaires were used for interview of 373 physicians and 1298 patients. The study of Arifon retard efficacy was carried out in 1438 outpatients with difficult-to-control hypertension. RESULTS: BP was above the goal level in 97.1% pts at the first analyzed visit to an outpatient department. Antihypertensive therapy was unchanged in 20.5% cases, the drug dose was increased in 46,6%, additional medication was administered in 36,8%. In 30.8% pts antihypertensive agent was substituted by another class drug. At the last analyzed visit target BP was found in 24.4% pts. BP control was poorer in pts with BP goal <130/80 mmHg (20.1%) than in those with higher target BP (25.9%). Achievement of BP goal was associated with combination therapy, higher rate of TD administration and with more frequent visits to physician. During hospitalization target BP <140/<90 mmHg was achieved in 87.1%,<130/<80 mmHg in. 76.2%. Arifon retard administration resulted in target BO achievement in 84.5% patients. Physicians percept low adherence to antihypertensive treatment, lack of patients knowledge about risk related to arterial hypertension, economical problems as main barriers to improvement of arterial hypertension management. Patients considered economical problems related to antihypertensive treatment more much less important than physicians did. CONCLUSION: The study results suggest the importance of therapeutic inertia overcome to improve arterial hypertension management in Russia. Low rate of multiple combination therapy and TD prescription are important features of therapeutic inertia. Polar perception of problems related to arterial hypertension by physicians and patients should be considered as influencing factors for educational programs development.