RESUMEN
Background: Radioligand therapy (RLT) targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is an effective antitumor-treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate carcinoma (mCRPC). Concerns of potential nephrotoxicity are based on renal tubular PSMA expression and the resulting radiopharmaceutical retention during RLT, but data confirming clinically significant renal toxicity are still lacking. In this study, patients with significantly impaired baseline kidney function before initiation of therapy were investigated for treatment-associated nephrotoxicity and the potential relationship with administered activities of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. Methods: Twenty-two mCRPC patients with impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≤ 60 mL/min) who received more than two cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT (median 5 cycles and median 6-week time interval between consecutive cycles) were analyzed in this study. Patients were treated within a prospective patient registry (REALITY Study, NCT04833517). Cumulative administered activities ranged from 17.1 to 85.6 GBq with a median activity of 6.5 GBq per cycle. Renal function was closely monitored during and after PSMA-RLT. Results: Mean pre-treatment GFR was 45.0 ± 10.7 mL/min. After two (22/22 patients), four (20/22 patients), and six cycles (10/22 patients) of RLT, a significant increase of GFR was noted (each p < 0.05). End-of-treatment GFR (54.1 ± 16.7 mL/min) was significantly higher than baseline GFR (p = 0.016). Only one patient experienced deterioration of renal function (change of CTCAE grade 2 to 3). The remaining patients showed no significant reduction of GFR, including follow-up assessments (6, 9, and 12 months), and even showed improved (10/22 patients) or unchanged (11/22 patients) CTCAE-based renal impairment grades during and after the end of PSMA-RLT. No significant correlation between the change in GFR and per-cycle (p = 0.605) or cumulative (p = 0.132) administered activities were found. Conclusions: As pre-treatment chronic kidney failure did not lead to detectable RLT-induced deterioration of renal function in our study, the nephrotoxic potential of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT may be overestimated and not of clinical priority in the setting of palliative treatment in mCRPC. We suggest not to categorically exclude patients from enrolment to PSMA-RLT due to renal impairment.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Little is known about the efficacy of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) against liver metastases of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We retrospectively analyzed efficacy-related outcomes of 177Lu-PSMA-617 RLT in this setting and potential predictors of those outcomes. METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive mCRPC patients with liver metastases given 177Lu-PSMA-617 RLT were analyzed retrospectively. Their planned regimen was 4-6 cycles at 6 ± 2-week intervals; the mean activity/cycle was 6.5 ± 0.5 GBq. Hepatic response was determined by modified positron emission tomography response criteria in solid tumors; association of such response with overall survival (OS) was tested, as were relationships of the selected patient, disease, and treatment characteristics with hepatic progression-free survival (PFShep) and OS. Survival analyses used Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test at p < 0.05 significance, and Cox proportional-hazards modeling. RESULTS: Median (minimum-maximum) follow-up was 37.5 (2.3-50.6) months. In liver metastases, complete or partial response was observed in 6 patients (21%) each, and stable disease in 1 (4%), for hepatic disease control in 46%. Overall, median (95% confidence interval) PFShep was 5.7 (2.2-9.2) months, and OS, 11.7 (3.0-20.4) months. Patients with hepatic disease control did not reach the median OS, while those with hepatic progressive disease had median OS (95% confidence interval) of 6.4 (1.6-11.1) months. In multivariate analysis, hepatic disease control by 177Lu-PSMA-617 RLT was significantly independently associated with OS, as was a prostate-specific antigen decline of ≥ 50% after 2 RLT cycles, and good baseline performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1). Hepatic tumor burden (≤ 25% vs. > 25% of liver volume) had no apparent relationship with hepatic tumor response, PFShep, or OS. CONCLUSION: 177Lu-PSMA-617 RLT frequently controlled liver metastases, resulting in long PFShep and significantly improved OS. Hepatic tumor burden appeared to lack any relationship with treatment efficacy, supporting 177Lu-PSMA-617 RLT of late-stage/end-stage mCRPC with liver metastases.