RESUMEN
Professionalism requires that doctors acknowledge their errors and figure out how to avoid making similar ones in the future. Over the last few decades, doctors have gotten better at acknowledging mistakes and apologizing to patients when a mistake happens. Such disclosure is especially complicated when one becomes aware of an error made by a colleague. We present a case in which consultant surgeons became aware that a colleague seemed to have made a serious error. Experts in surgery and bioethics comment on appropriate responses to this situation.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Revelación , Enfermedad de Hirschsprung/cirugía , Errores Médicos , Médicos/normas , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Enfermedad de Hirschsprung/diagnóstico , Humanos , Recién NacidoRESUMEN
High ligation of the inguinal hernia sac is standard practice for many pediatric surgeons in postpubertal adolescents. Most adult surgeons do not use this technique to repair indirect inguinal hernias because of concerns for higher recurrence rates compared with mesh repairs. Therefore, we examined long-term outcomes of adolescent high ligation hernia repair performed by pediatric surgeons. Telephone surveys were conducted on children over 12 years old at the time of repair, and patients and/or their parents were contacted 18 months postrepair. Patients were identified from two institutions between 1998 and 2010. The incidences of reoperation, recurrence, presence of bulge, chronic pain, or numbness were determined. A total of 210 patients (40.7% response rate) were available for phone interviews at 18.6 to 159.5 months postrepair. Mean age was 14.6 ± 1.8 (range: 12.0-19.0 years). Fourteen patients had pain (6.7%) and five had numbness (2.4%). There were four (1.9%) patients with a second operation, two of which confirmed a recurrent hernia. Three patients expressed concern about possible recurrence. Two report a bulge, but have not been evaluated. Pediatric hernia repair with high sac ligation appears effective in patients anatomically similar to adults with low recurrence rate and low incidence of chronic symptoms. These data suggest that prospective trials on the adequacy of high ligation in adults are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Ligadura/métodos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Obtaining a chest radiograph (CXR) after chest tube (CT) removal to rule out a pneumothorax is a universal practice. However, the yield of this CXR has not been well documented. Additionally, most iatrogenic pneumothoraces resulting from CT removal are atmospheric in origin, asymptomatic, and can be observed. Recently, we have begun to discontinue routine CXR for CT removal. We evaluated our experience with CT removal to clarify the usefulness of routine post CT removal CXR. METHODS: After IRB approval, a retrospective study was conducted on patients who had a CT placed in the past decade. Cardiac patients requiring a CT were excluded. Patient demographics, diagnosis, treatments, and outcomes were collected. Patients were divided into two groups, those with a CXR after CT removal (Group 1) and those without (Group 2). Percentages were compared with Chi square with Yates correction. RESULTS: 462 patients were identified (group 1=327, group 2=135). Indications for CT included; empyema (n=176), lung resection (n=146), pneumothorax (n=71), pleural effusion (n=26), spinal fusion (n=20), trauma (n=16), and miscellaneous (n=7). Seven patients (2.1%) in group 1 required reinsertion for pneumothorax (n=4), empyema (n=2), and pleural effusion (n=1) compared to 1 patient (0.7%) in group 2 who required reinsertion for pleural effusion. This difference was not significant (P=0.2). CONCLUSIONS: In non-cardiac patients with a CT, tube reinsertion is uncommon and tube replacement is secondary to symptoms. Therefore, routine post CT removal CXR is not necessary. CXR in these patients should be obtained based upon clinical indications after CT removal.
Asunto(s)
Tubos Torácicos , Remoción de Dispositivos , Neumotórax/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Niño , Remoción de Dispositivos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neumotórax/etiología , Radiografía Torácica , Enfermedades Respiratorias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Toracostomía/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patients with single ventricle physiology (SVP)--specifically, hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS)--frequently need long-term enteral access; however, they are at an extremely high operative risk. Nothing has been published on the physiologic impact on single ventricle function during laparoscopy in this patient population. Therefore, we performed intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to study the physiologic effects of laparoscopic surgery in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After Internal Review Board approval, patients with SVP undergoing laparoscopic gastrostomy were studied with intraoperative TEE, and fractional shortening was determined. Patients were separated into those with HLHS and others with SVP. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation values. Analysis of variance was used for continuous variables. RESULTS: From August 2011 to February 2013, in total, 11 patients with SVP underwent laparoscopic gastrostomy, including 6 with HLHS. One of the 6 HLHS patients and 1 of the SVP patients underwent concurrent fundoplication. All patients were post-first-stage palliation; two had completed post-second stage. Fractional shortening tended to decrease during insufflation and return to baseline after desufflation. There was no 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumoperitoneum associated with laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement results in a reversible decrease in fractional shortening in patients with HLHS and SVP. Overall, the children tolerated pneumoperitoneum. TEE allows for real-time assessment of ventricular function and volume and may improve safety during longer procedures.
Asunto(s)
Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Gastrostomía , Corazón/fisiopatología , Síndrome del Corazón Izquierdo Hipoplásico/fisiopatología , Laparoscopía , Preescolar , Femenino , Fundoplicación , Ventrículos Cardíacos , Humanos , Síndrome del Corazón Izquierdo Hipoplásico/complicaciones , Lactante , Hipertensión Intraabdominal/fisiopatología , Masculino , Cuidados PaliativosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common operations performed by pediatric surgeons. Although the practice of sending the hernia sac for histologic examination after routine hernia repair is common, the indications and practice patterns for this have not been evaluated. The objective of this survey was to determine practice patterns and indications for histologic analysis of the pediatric inguinal hernia sac. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 9-question online survey was sent to all members of the International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG). A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to determine whether practice patterns of sending the hernia sac for histologic evaluation were associated with respondent characteristics. The chi-squared test with Yates's correction was used where appropriate. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 315 IPEG members, for a response rate of 54.4%. Hernia sacs were sent for histologic evaluation always by 23.9%, often by 5.1%, rarely by 17.5%, and never by 53.5%. The respondent characteristics were not associated with whether or not specimens were sent for histology review. Of the 128 who reported sending the inguinal hernia sac, the most common reasons were hospital/state requirements (47.6%), followed by routine practice (25.7%) and concern for missed pathology (24.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of IPEG respondents report never sending the inguinal hernia sac for histologic analysis. Of those that do, most are influenced by hospital/state requirements. The value of sending the hernia sac after routine inguinal hernia repair should be validated if it is to remain an institutional requirement.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía General , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Técnicas Histológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatría , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Hernia Inguinal/patología , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Complications of totally implanted venous access ports are well documented. A concerning mechanical complication we have encountered is posterior penetration of plastic ports with the access needle. The purpose of this study is to investigate the burden of posterior penetrations. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all ports placed between November 2007 and December 2011 at a single institution. RESULTS: There were 247 children who received a port. 117 children (47%) received a port with a plastic posterior wall, 95 children (38%) received a port with a metal posterior wall, and 35 children (14%) had ports that were unable to be identified as plastic or metal. Posterior port penetrations occurred 8 times (3.2% overall, 6.8% of plastic ports). All perforations occurred in plastic ports of a single brand and product code. Average time from port insertion to penetration was 11.2±21.3 months (range 0.3 to 63.4 months). Other complications included catheter malfunction (14), infection (9), pain (2), inability to draw/aspirate (4), leak (3), port migration (2), and malfunctioning not otherwise specified (15). CONCLUSIONS: There is an unacceptably high risk of needle penetration of the posterior wall of plastic ports. We recommend utilizing ports with metal backing to avoid this complication.
Asunto(s)
Falla de Equipo , Agujas , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Niño , Preescolar , Diseño de Equipo , Extravasación de Materiales Terapéuticos y Diagnósticos/etiología , Femenino , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/etiología , Humanos , Infecciones/etiología , Masculino , Dolor/etiología , Plásticos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Single site laparoscopy for appendectomy is a technique with several case series suggesting a cosmetic advantage, but without prospective comparative data. We conducted a prospective, randomized trial comparing single site laparoscopic appendectomy to the standard 3-port approach, including scar assessment at early and long-term follow-up. METHODS: Enrolled patients over 12years old and parents of patients less than 12years old were asked to complete the validated Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire (PSAQ) at early follow-up around 6weeks and by phone after 18months. The PSAQ consists of 4 scored subscales: Appearance, Consciousness, Appearance Satisfaction, and Symptom Satisfaction. Each subscale has a set of questions with a 4-point categorical response (1=most favorable, 4=least favorable). The sum of the scores quantifies each subscale. RESULTS: Early questionnaires were obtained from 98 3-port and 100 single-site patients with the single-site approach producing superior overall scar assessment (P=0.003). By telephone follow-up, questionnaires were completed by 49 3-port and 56 single-site patients at a median of 25 (18-32) months. In this longer-term follow-up, overall scar assessment was not significantly different between groups (P=0.06). CONCLUSION: Patients or parents express superior scar assessment with the single site approach at early follow-up, but this difference disappears in the long-term.
Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía/métodos , Cicatriz/patología , Laparoscopía/métodos , Adolescente , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Niño , Cicatriz/etiología , Cicatriz/psicología , Estética , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Padres/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Pacientes/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Controversy exists regarding differences in mortality between isolated ileal perforation (IIP) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). We sought to identify risk factors and determine mortality rates for these two entities. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on all patients with NEC or IIP undergoing surgical management at our institution from May 1971 to December 2011. Demographics, birth history, management strategies, and mortality were recorded. Chi-square and unpaired t-test were used where appropriate. RESULTS: During the study period, 236 patients underwent operative management with 17.8% of those being for IIP. Patients with IIP had a lower estimated gestational age (27.8 ± 3.0 vs. 29.5 ± 4.2 weeks, p = 0.014), were more likely to be of multiple gestation (33.3 vs. 16.5%, p = 0.022), and were younger at diagnosis (8.7 ± 8.1 vs. 14.3 ± 11.1 days, p = 0.003) compared with those undergoing operation for NEC. Mortality was threefold lower with IIP (9.5 vs. 36.1%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: IIP carries a unique set of risk factors and has a significantly lower mortality rate when compared with NEC.
Asunto(s)
Enterocolitis Necrotizante/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Íleon/mortalidad , Perforación Intestinal/mortalidad , Edad de Inicio , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/complicaciones , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/cirugía , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Enfermedades del Íleon/etiología , Recién Nacido , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Masculino , Progenie de Nacimiento Múltiple , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pain control is the dominant management issue after bar placement for pectus excavatum. We previously conducted a prospective, randomized trial comparing patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) to thoracic epidural (EPI) documenting similar objective outcomes. Our impression is that the subjective cognitive experience differs between the groups, which impacts trial results interpretation. Therefore, we conducted a survey to ascertain patient recollection and impression of their experience. METHODS: By telephone questionnaire, yes/no questions included early course recall, anxiety, if they would choose the same arm, do the operation again, or recommend it to friends. Qualitative questions included description, location, and time of peak pain. The graded question addressed severity of pain (1-5). RESULTS: We contacted 27 EPI and 38 PCA patients with a median follow-up of 3.2 y. The majority (~/= 85%) of both groups remembered the first 2 d. Mean pain severity was 3.0 in both groups (3 = bad, but tolerable). Description, location, and time of peak pain responses did not differ. Anxiety was reported by 30% of EPI group and 18% of PCA group (P = 0.37). Approximately 15% of both groups still think about the pain. No differences were seen in nausea, emesis, constipation, itching, or sleepiness. Most patients would choose the same group (87% PCA, 81% EPI, P = 0.73), have the operation again (87% PCA, 74% EPI, P = 0.21), and recommend the operation to friends (100% PCA, 96% EPI, P = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term recall after repair of pectus excavatum with bar placement does not substantially differ between those managed with an epidural or PCA.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia Epidural , Analgesia Controlada por el Paciente , Tórax en Embudo/cirugía , Umbral del Dolor/psicología , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/psicología , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Entrevistas como Asunto , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Oxicodona/uso terapéutico , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 2009, we instituted a protocol to standardize care for patients undergoing interval appendectomy based on results from a prospective trial that demonstrated a reduction in the mean number of computed tomography (CT) scans performed. The goal of this study was to determine if our current practice now resulted in fewer CT scans as a result of this trial. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis from March 2009 to March 2011 was performed. Demographics and outcomes were compared to previously collected data from a retrospective study prior to institution of the protocol and to the prospective trial. RESULTS: During the study period, 45 patients underwent interval appendectomy. There were no differences in demographics among the three studies. Similar numbers of patients underwent aspiration or percutaneous drainage. There continues to be a significant reduction in the number of CT scans (3.5 ± 2.0 vs. 2.1 ± 1.3, P = 0.0001) and health care visits (7.6 ± 2.8 vs. 4.5 ± 1.4, P = 0.0001) when comparing management prior to the prospective trial to management since its completion. CONCLUSION: A protocol for management of patients undergoing interval appendectomy care results in fewer health care visits and CT scans.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Drenaje/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Niño , Drenaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIM: The objective of this study was to identify the incidence and factors associated with redo Nissen fundoplication in children. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval (5100277), data for children under 18 years of age from two children's hospitals with fundoplication performed between January 1994 and December 2010 were reviewed. Children with one fundoplication were compared to those with redos to identify factors associated with redo. Variables were compared using t-tests for continuous and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Logistic regression evaluated for independence. RESULTS: There were 823 patients and 54.7% were male. A redo fundoplication was required in 100 (12.2% of cohort); 82 had 1 redo, 14 had 2 redos, and 4 had 3 redos. Follow-up ranged from 0.01 to 16.9 years (median: 2.9 years). Factors associated with redo were: younger age at first fundoplication, (p=0.002), hiatal dissection (p<0.001), and male gender (p=0.008). Independent predictors of redo were: hiatal dissection at first fundoplication, OR: 8.45 (95% CI: 2.45-29.11), retching, OR: 3.59 (95% CI: 1.56-8.25) and younger age at first fundoplication, OR: 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97-0.98). CONCLUSION: The incidence of redo fundoplication in children is 12.2%. The risk of redo is significantly increased if patients are younger, have retching, and if the esophageal hiatus is dissected at the first fundoplication.
Asunto(s)
Fundoplicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fundoplicación/métodos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Laparoscopía , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We previously reported a prospective, randomized trial comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic decortication (VATS) to fibrinolysis for the treatment of empyema. In that study no advantages to VATS were identified, although VATS resulted in significantly higher hospital charges. We subsequently implemented the algorithm from the trial utilizing primary fibrinolytic therapy in all children diagnosed with empyema. In this study, we reviewed our experience to examine the clinical efficacy of this protocol. METHODS: After IRB approval, we conducted a retrospective review of all children diagnosed with empyema as all were treated with the fibrinolysis protocol utilized in the prospective trial since the completion of the trial. RESULTS: In 102 consecutive patients treated with fibrinolysis, 16 patients (15.7%) required subsequent VATS. No patients were treated with initial VATS. No major side effects were seen from fibrinolytic therapy. Mean operative time for VATS after fibrinolysis was 62 minutes. The length of stay after VATS was 5.9 days. CONCLUSIONS: The results of an evidence-based protocol using fibrinolysis to treat empyema have replicated the results of the trial that led to the implementation of the protocol. The pediatric empyema population can be successfully treated without an operation in the majority of cases.
Asunto(s)
Empiema Pleural/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico , Algoritmos , Niño , Preescolar , Protocolos Clínicos , Terapia Combinada , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Esquema de Medicación , Empiema Pleural/cirugía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Succión , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video , Toracostomía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We instituted a clinical pathway for the care of patients with perforated appendicitis based on outcomes from several clinical trials. The objective of this study was to review effects on resource utilization with this protocol. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted to compare all patients undergoing appendectomy during initial admission for perforated appendicitis prior to the pathway (July 2001 to December 2003) to after (December 2008 to March 2011). Demographics and management strategies were evaluated. RESULTS: Charts of 151 patients prior to and 259 after the start of the pathway were reviewed. The percentage of patients leaving the operating room with a nasogastric tube (NGT) was significantly lower in the after-group, while similar numbers of patients during each period had a NGT placed on the floor. The proportion of patients receiving peripherally inserted central catheters and total parenteral nutrition, and the number of intravenous antibiotics per day and lab draws were significantly reduced with the protocol. Patients were started on a regular diet significantly earlier, and length of stay was shortened by more than one day. CONCLUSION: The evidence-based clinical pathway developed from prospective trials has drastically reduced resource utilization for children with perforated appendicitis.
Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía , Apendicitis/cirugía , Vías Clínicas , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/normas , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Current literature for resolution of abdominal pain after cholecystectomy in children with biliary dyskinesia shows variable outcomes. We sought to compare early outcomes with long-term symptom resolution in children. METHODS: Telephone surveys were conducted on children who underwent cholecystectomy for biliary dyskinesia between January 2000 and January 2011 at two centers. Retrospective review was performed to obtain demographics and short-term outcomes. RESULTS: Charts of 105 patients' age 7.9-19 years were reviewed; 80.9 % were female. All were symptomatic with an ejection fraction (EF) <35 % or pain with cholecystokinin administration. At the postoperative visit, 76.1 % had resolution of symptoms. Fifty-six (53.3 %) patients were available for follow-up at median 3.7 (1.1-10.7) years. Of these, 34 (60.7 %) reported no ongoing abdominal pain. Of the 22 patients with persistent symptoms, satisfaction score was 7.3 ± 2.7 (scale of 1-10) and 19 (86.4 %) were glad that they had a cholecystectomy performed. EF, body mass index percentile (BMI %), and pain with cholecystokinin (CCK) were not predictive of ongoing pain at either follow-up periods. CONCLUSION: Short-term symptom resolution in children undergoing cholecystectomy for biliary dyskinesia is not reflective of long-term results. Neither EF, BMI % nor pain with CCK was predictive of symptom resolution. The majority of patients with ongoing complaints do not regret cholecystectomy.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/complicaciones , Discinesia Biliar/complicaciones , Discinesia Biliar/cirugía , Colecistectomía/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Periodo Posoperatorio , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We treat patients after appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with patient controlled analgesia (PCA) using a background continuous dose. We usually place urinary catheters in these patients because of concerns of urinary retention. The objective of the present study was to determine the rate of urinary retention in this patient population when a catheter was not used or was removed before the continuous PCA infusion was discontinued. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who had received PCA postoperatively for perforated appendicitis from December 2008 to May 2011. The demographics, need for replacement of a Foley catheter, number of recorded nursing calls to physicians, and the incidence of urinary tract infection was recorded. Patients who had received a urinary catheter intraoperatively were compared with those who had not. Subgroups were also created according to whether the patients with a Foley catheter had undergone removal of their catheter before or after cessation of the continuous PCA infusion. RESULTS: Of 242 patients, 20 (8.3%) did not have a catheter postoperatively, 1 of whom required a catheter because of retention. Of the 222 patients who started with a catheter, 2 required reinsertion for retention (P = 0.59). Age, gender, and body mass index were similar for patients with and without a catheter. In the subgroup analysis, of the patients with a catheter, 48 (21.6%) had their catheter removed before discontinuation of the continuous PCA infusion and none required Foley catheter replacement. Of the 174 patients whose catheters were removed after discontinuation of the continuous PCA dose, 2 required catheter replacement (P = 0.46). A significantly higher percentage of telephone calls was generated for patients with a catheter than for patients without a Foley catheter (41.4% versus 10%, P = 0.007). No patients with a catheter developed a urinary tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a perforated appendicitis who receive a continuous PCA have a low rate of urinary retention whether or not a catheter has been placed intraoperatively.
Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía , Apendicitis/cirugía , Apendicitis/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Cateterismo Urinario , Retención Urinaria/prevención & control , Analgesia Controlada por el Paciente/efectos adversos , Apendicitis/epidemiología , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Masculino , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Cateterismo Urinario/estadística & datos numéricos , Retención Urinaria/inducido químicamente , Retención Urinaria/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Foreign bodies in the esophagus are common in children. Time from ingestion to presentation is variable, and may not be known. Our center usually performs Foley catheter balloon extraction under fluoroscopy as the first step to attempt removal to prevent all patients from going to the operating room. The efficacy of this procedure has been reported. However, information is lacking about the relationship between presentation variables and the likelihood of success. METHODS: After IRB approval, we performed a retrospective single-center review from January 1988 to August 2011 of children with an esophageal foreign body. Pearson's correlation was used to evaluate the relationship between variables and successful balloon extraction for P < 0.05. A logistic regression was done to evaluate for independence. RESULTS: 819 patients presented with esophageal foreign bodies, with a mean age of 3.3 years. 572 patients underwent balloon extraction, 83 % successful. Mean ingestion duration was 16.6 h with fluoroscopy time of 2.3 min and mean number of attempts was 1.5. Successful balloon extraction had a negative correlation with refusal to eat, respiratory distress, cough, wheeze, upper respiratory infection symptoms, stridor, fever, duration of ingestion >1 day, unwitnessed ingestion, fluoroscopy time and number of balloon catheter attempts. There was a positive correlation between success and both age and duration of ingestion <1 day. Independent predictive factors were number of balloon catheter attempts. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with longer duration of ingestion, symptoms from the foreign body and increased number of removal attempts have a decreased likelihood of success with balloon catheter extraction and should not undergo prolonged efforts of removal.
Asunto(s)
Esófago , Cuerpos Extraños/terapia , Cateterismo/instrumentación , Preescolar , Femenino , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Inducción de Remisión , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In October 2008, the American College of Surgeons revealed the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Pediatric in an effort to improve quality of surgical care in children. A 5% disagreement rate of data reported between institutions is accepted. The two goals of this study were to (1) determine if the random sampling performed with NSQIP data collection was representative of the population, and (2) verify that data captured in NSQIP was accurate. METHODS: For children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy from April 2010-April 2011, demographic data, length of stay (LOS), and rates of surgical site infection (SSI) and postoperative abscess recorded in NSQIP (group 1) were compared with data from chart review (group 2). Secondarily, all NSQIP data were examined for accuracy by comparing relevant data points to existing databases. All disagreements were further examined with review of the medical chart. Unpaired t-test and χ(2) with Fisher's exact test were used in the statistical analysis. RESULTS: NSQIP Pediatric captured data from 126 children (group 1); group 2 had 525 children. There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, gender, race or LOS between the two groups. Rate of SSI was 1.6% in group 1 and 1.7% in group 2 (P = 0.92). Abscess rate was 1.6% in group 1 and 3.4% in group 2 (P = 0.28). There were six errors in the NSQIP database. One child was listed as having two SSI. One child with postoperative abscess was missed and another was not counted as they were not categorized correctly. Recorded LOS was incorrect for two children and the other had incorrect age. CONCLUSIONS: NSQIP Pediatric captured a representative sample of patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. Errors were found in the reporting of outcomes for SSI and postoperative abscess in children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. Given the low incidence of these outcomes, there is little effect on percentages of complications reported.
Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía/normas , Apendicitis/cirugía , Bases de Datos Factuales/normas , Laparoscopía/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/normas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/normas , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Pediatric surgery fellowship is considered one of the most competitive subspecialties in medicine. With fierce competition increasing the stakes, publications and first authorship are paramount to the success rate of matching. We analyzed Electronic Residency Application Service applications for verification of authorship to determine rate of misrepresentation. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, the bibliographies of fellowship applications from 2007-2009 were reviewed to allow time for publication. Only peer-reviewed journal articles were evaluated. A Medline search was conducted for the article, by author or by title. If the article could not be found, other authors and journal were used as search parameters. If the article was still not found, the website for the journal was searched for abstract or manuscript. Finally, an experienced medical sciences librarian was consulted for remaining unidentified articles. Differences between misrepresented and accurate applications were analyzed, including: age, gender, medical and undergraduate school parameters, advanced degrees, other fellowships, number of publications, first author publications, American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination scores, and match success. RESULTS: There were 147 applications reviewed. Evidence of misrepresentation was found in 17.6% of the applicants (24/136), with 34 instances in 785 manuscripts (4.3%). Manuscripts classified as published were verified 96.7% of the time, were not found in 1.4%, and had incorrect authors or journal in less than 1% each. "In press" manuscripts were verified 88.3% of the time, 6.4% could not be found, and 4.3% had an incorrect journal listing. Number of publications (P = 0.026) and first author publications (P = 0.037) correlated with misrepresentation. None of the remaining variables was significant. CONCLUSIONS: The pediatric surgical pool has a very low incidence of suspicious citations; however, authorship claims should be verified.
Asunto(s)
Autoria , Becas/ética , Fraude/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía General/educación , Pediatría/educación , Edición/ética , Conducta Competitiva , Becas/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Cirugía General/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Internado y Residencia/ética , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Solicitud de Empleo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pediatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Edición/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intussusception is most commonly managed with air-contrast reduction. However, when this fails, emergent operation with resection or manual reduction is indicated. It is not known if there are advantages to resection compared with manual reduction. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients receiving operative care for intussusception from February 2000 to December 2011. Patients undergoing intestinal resection were compared with those treated with manual reduction alone. RESULTS: Of 111 patients, 49 underwent resection and 62 underwent manual reduction. Mean (±SD) time to oral intake favored manual reduction (2.1 ± 1.2 versus 2.6 ± 1.2 d, respectively, P=0.05). Manual reduction was associated with a greater need for repeat imaging (47% versus 18%, P=0.002) and the only recurrences were with manual reduction (8% versus 0%, P=0.1). Mean duration of stay was no different (P=0.36), nor was the need for reoperation (P=0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing manual reduction have an increased number of radiographic imaging procedures. The surgeon should have a low threshold for resection for intussusceptions requiring operative management.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Intususcepción/cirugía , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Obstrucción Intestinal/epidemiología , Intususcepción/diagnóstico por imagen , Intususcepción/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Morbilidad , Estomía , Radiografía , Recuperación de la Función , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Many neonatal centers offer surgical ligation of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) after two failed courses of pharmacologic therapy. This study compares health status of extremely premature (< 28 weeks gestation) neonates who failed medical therapy at the time of their second course of medical treatment versus operation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on neonates born at less than 28 weeks gestation who underwent PDA ligation after two rounds of medical therapy over a 7.5-year period. Measurements of health status at the time of the second course of medical therapy and the time of operation were compared. RESULTS: Neonates (n = 34) required less fraction of inspired oxygen (33.5 ± 12.9% vs. 48.5 ± 24%, p < 0.0001), had lower mean airway pressure (7.5 ± 1.9 vs. 9.1 ± 2.4 mm Hg, p < 0.0001), and were less likely to require vasopressor support (16.7 vs. 60%, p = 0.0126) at the time of the start of second course than at surgery. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that extremely premature neonates show a decline in cardiopulmonary reserve between a second course of medical therapy and surgical intervention.