RESUMEN
If leadership skills can be developed during post-medical school training, physicians will be better prepared to influence positive change for their patients and communities. Based on both LEADS and CanMEDS Leader competencies, a mixed methods approach was used to identify the most valued leadership constructs and which of these should be prioritized for development in an enhanced family medicine curriculum. The interpersonal skills were identified most often and included: self-awareness/leads self, effective communications, leading change and building teams. While some opportunities to achieve competence in leadership skills already exist in family medicine residency programs, increased attention to providing development opportunities as well as assessment methods and faculty development is necessary in order to support new doctors as leaders. This study identifies over-arching goals to guide curriculum change in order to achieve this.
Asunto(s)
Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/educación , Liderazgo , Curriculum , Educación , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Competencia ProfesionalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Labels with special instructions regarding how a prescription medication should be taken or its possible side effects are often applied to pill bottles. The goal of this study was to determine whether the addition of illustrations to these labels affects patient comprehension. METHODS: Study participants (N = 130) were enrolled by approaching patients at three family practice clinics in Toronto, Canada. Participants were asked to interpret two sets of medication instruction labels, the first with text only and the second with the same text accompanied by illustrations. Two investigators coded participants' responses as incorrect, partially correct, or completely correct. Health literacy levels of participants were measured using a validated instrument, the REALM test. RESULTS: All participants gave a completely correct interpretation for three out of five instruction labels, regardless of whether illustrations were present or not. For the two most complex labels, only 34-55% of interpretations of the text-only version were completely correct. The addition of illustrations was associated with improved performance in 5-7% of subjects and worsened performance in 7-9% of subjects. CONCLUSION: The commonly-used illustrations on the medication labels used in this study were of little or no use in improving patients' comprehension of the accompanying written instructions.