RESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative pain in patients using an abdominal binder with a control group after laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification level 1). SETTING: An academic gynecologic surgeon's practice. PATIENTS: Private patients undergoing surgery performed by a fellowship-trained minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon between April 2016 and April 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Ninety total patients were selected for this study, with 60 randomized to receive an abdominal binder after surgery and 30 patients randomized to the control group without a binder. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Using a 10-point verbal analog scale, patients recorded pain levels for 3 weeks postoperatively on a variety of measures, including overall and incisional pain. They recorded results on postoperative days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, and 21. On average, the association between time and the overall pain score did not differ with binder use (p = .37). The overall pain decreases significantly over time (p < .001). After adjusting for time, the overall pain score differed significantly by binder status (p = .04). Those without a binder reported an average pain score that was 1.13 (standard deviation = 0.55) points higher than those with a binder across the first week. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that abdominal binder use after LESS surgery may be beneficial in reducing postoperative pain in the first week. Results from this study can provide feasibility data for future studies.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Abdomen , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Herida QuirúrgicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: With advances in laparoscopic surgery, the goal of surgeons and patients is to minimize pain to allow for faster recovery and return to normal daily activities. One of these advances is single-site surgery. In this study, we compared postoperative pain in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) to that in traditional multiple-incision hysterectomy. METHODS: Seventy patients were selected for this prospective cohort study, with 35 undergoing multiple-incision and 35 undergoing LESS hysterectomy. All patients were included who were undergoing hysterectomy with the primary surgeon. All multiport hysterectomies were performed laparoscopically. Six patients underwent LESS hysterectomy and 29 underwent robotic single-site surgery (rLESS). Patients recorded pain levels for 3 weeks after surgery on a variety of measures, including overall and incisional pain. Linear mixed effects models for repeated measures were used for all multivariate analyses, with an unstructured covariance matrix accounting for correlation between time points. RESULTS: Overall, across all time points, there was an average reduction in pain by 1.26 (SD 0.69) points in the single-site group (P = .06). Days 3 and 14 had a marginally significant reduction in pain (P = .06 and 0.058, respectively). On days 4 and 7 there was a significant reduction in overall pain (P = .04 and .04, respectively). CONCLUSION: Based on the results, it is likely that single-site hysterectomy leads to less postoperative pain and achieves a lower pain score faster than multiport surgery. A randomized control trial is necessary to confirm these results before accepting them in clinical practice.