RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bacterial contamination of intravascular devices has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality in various hospital settings, including the perioperative environment. Catheter hub disinfection has been shown in an ex vivo model to attenuate intraoperative injection of bacterial organisms originating from the anesthesia provider's hands, providing the impetus for improvement in intraoperative disinfection techniques and compliance. In the current study, we investigated the clinical effectiveness of a new, passive catheter care station in reducing the incidence of bacterial contamination of open lumen patient IV stopcock sets. The secondary aim was to evaluate the impact of this novel intervention on the combined incidence of 30-day postoperative infections and IV catheter-associated phlebitis. METHODS: Five hundred ninety-four operating room environments were randomized by a computer-generated list to receive either a novel catheter care bundle (HubScrub and DOCit) or standard caps in conjunction with a sterile, conventional open lumen 3-way stopcock set (24 inch with 3-gang 4-way and T-Connector). Patients underwent general anesthesia according to usual practice and were followed prospectively for 30 postoperative days to identify the development of health care-associated infections (HCAIs) and/or phlebitis. The primary outcome was intraoperative bacterial contamination of the primary stopcock set used by the anesthesia provider(s). The secondary outcome was the combined incidence of 30-day postoperative infections and phlebitis. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-two operating rooms were included in the final analysis. Study groups were comparable with no significant differences in patient, provider, anesthetic, or procedural characteristics. The catheter care station reduced the incidence of primary stopcock lumen contamination compared with standard caps (odds ratio [OR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.98, P = 0.034) and was associated with a reduction in the combined incidence of HCAIs and IV catheter-associated phlebitis with and without adjustment for patient and procedural covariates (OR(adjusted) 0.589, 95% CI 0.353-0.984, P = 0.040). The risk-adjusted number needed to treat to eliminate 1 case of lumen contamination was 9 (95% CI 3.4-13.5) patients, whereas the risk-adjusted number needed to treat to eliminate 1 case of HCAI/catheter-associated phlebitis was 17 (95% CI 11.8-17.9) patients. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative use of a passive catheter care station significantly reduced open lumen bacterial contamination and the combined incidence of 30-day postoperative infections and phlebitis.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Inyecciones Intravenosas/efectos adversos , Inyecciones Intravenosas/instrumentación , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anestesia General , Anestesia Intravenosa , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Demografía , Desinfección/métodos , Método Doble Ciego , Contaminación de Equipos , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quirófanos/organización & administración , Flebitis/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Centros Traumatológicos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Device-related bloodstream infections are associated with a significant increase in patient morbidity and mortality in multiple health care settings. Recently, intraoperative bacterial contamination of conventional open-lumen 3-way stopcock sets has been shown to be associated with increased patient mortality. Intraoperative use of disinfectable, needleless closed catheter devices (DNCCs) may reduce the risk of bacterial injection as compared to conventional open-lumen devices due to an intrinsic barrier to bacterial entry associated with valve design and/or the capacity for surface disinfection. However, the relative benefit of DNCC valve design (intrinsic barrier capacity) as compared to surface disinfection in attenuation of bacterial injection in the clinical environment is untested and entirely unknown. The primary aim of the current study was to investigate the relative efficacy of a novel disinfectable stopcock, the Ultraport zero, with and without disinfection in attenuating intraoperative injection of potential bacterial pathogens as compared to a conventional open-lumen stopcock intravascular device. The secondary aims were to identify risk factors for bacterial injection and to estimate the quantity of bacterial organisms injected during catheter handling. METHODS: Four hundred sixty-eight operating room environments were randomized by a computer generated list to 1 of 3 device-injection schemes: (1) injection of the Ultraport zero stopcock with hub disinfection before injection, (2) injection of the Ultraport zero stopcock without prior hub disinfection, and (3) injection of the conventional open-lumen stopcock closed with sterile caps according to usual practice. After induction of general anesthesia, the primary anesthesia provider caring for patients in each operating room environment was asked to perform a series of 5 injections of sterile saline through the assigned device into an ex vivo catheter system. The primary outcome was the incidence of bacterial contamination of the injected fluid column (effluent). Risk factors for effluent contamination were identified in univariate analysis, and a controlled laboratory experiment was used to generate an estimate of the bacterial load injected for contaminated effluent samples. RESULTS: The incidence of effluent bacterial contamination was 0% (0/152) for the Ultraport zero stopcock with hub disinfection before injection, 4% (7/162) for the Ultraport zero stopcock without hub disinfection before injection, and 3.2% (5/154) for the conventional open-lumen stopcock. The Ultraport zero stopcock with hub disinfection before injection was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of bacterial injection as compared to the conventional open-lumen stopcock (RR = 8.15 × 10(-8), 95% CI, 3.39 × 10(-8) to 1.96 × 10(-7), P = <0.001), with an absolute risk reduction of 3.2% (95% CI, 0.5% to 7.4%). Provider glove use was a risk factor for effluent contamination (RR = 10.48, 95% CI, 3.16 to 34.80, P < 0.001). The estimated quantity of bacteria injected reached a clinically significant threshold of 50,000 colony-forming units per each injection series. CONCLUSIONS: The Ultraport zero stopcock with hub disinfection before injection was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of inadvertent bacterial injection as compared to the conventional open-lumen stopcock. Future studies should examine strategies designed to facilitate health care provider DNCC hub disinfection and proper device handling.