RESUMEN
The largest single unit cost in the hospital cost for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the cost of knee implants. We developed a knee implant standardization program to provide guidelines for knee implant selection and to reduce the cost of knee implants for hospitals. Patients are assigned to demand categories based on five criteria: age, weight, expected activity, general health, and bone stock. Implants are assigned to demand categories based on an implant's projected capacity to handle the patient's projected demand. The program was applied retrospectively to 127 knee replacement operations performed on 93 patients during 1992. If this program had been in place, 8.4% of what was actually spent on knee implants for these 127 patients would have been saved. If the most expensive implants allowed in each demand category had actually been used, the program would have saved our hospital 12.8% of the cost of knee implants for these patients. Potential savings were noted in higher demand categories I and II by reducing the use of expensive cementless, porous-coated implants. The greatest potential savings were noted in lower demand categories III and IV: 11% savings could have been realized in demand category III, and 27% savings could have been achieved in the cost of knee implants in demand category IV. Potential savings would have been realized in these lower demand categories because of the recommended use of an all-polyethylene tibial component in 38 of 92 patients. This knee implant standardization program has the potential to assist surgeons in selecting knee implants and reduce the cost of knee implants without compromising outcome following TKA.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/economía , Prótesis de la Rodilla/economía , Prótesis de la Rodilla/normas , Anciano , Control de Costos , Ahorro de Costo , Femenino , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Selección de Paciente , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been targeted by the United States federal government for cost control because of its high cost and rising incidence in the aging population. The hospital cost for THA during the 1980s was controlled by utilization review and a reduction in the volume of services delivered for each THA. The single largest increase in the cost of THA during the 1980s was the cost of hip implants. The Lahey Clinic Hip Implant Standardization Program was developed to provide objective guidelines for hip implant selection. These guidelines are based on the demands a patients is expected to place on his or her hip prosthesis. Because not every patient requires an expensive high-demand hip prosthesis, the standardization program also has the potential to reduce the hospital cost for hip implants without compromising patient care. Patients are assigned to four demand categories based on five objective criteria: age, weight, expected activity, general health, and bone stock. Selection of the prosthesis in each of the four demand categories is intended to match the implant's capacity with expected patient demand. The standardization program was retrospectively applied to 103 THAs performed during 1991. Analysis of variance demonstrated that patient variables and demand categories were statistically significant groupings. The cost of hip implants would have been reduced by 25.7% with the Lahey Clinic Hip Implant Standardization Program. A prospective outcome study is required to determine the long-term validity of this standardization program.