Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Surg Res ; 283: 249-258, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36423473

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To investigate and compare complications after gonadal vein embolization (GVE) with coils and gonadal vein resection (GVR) in patients with pelvic venous disorder (PeVD). METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 277 female patients with PeVD who underwent GVE with coils (n = 150) or GVR (n = 122) in the period from 2000 to 2020. The participants were selected from a cohort of 4975 patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP), of whom 1107 suffered from the PeVD-related CPP and 305 underwent surgical or endovascular intervention on the gonadal veins. The GVR technique was open retroperitoneal in 92, endoscopic transperitoneal in 18, and retroperitoneal in 12 patients. Clinical outcomes included 30-day complication rates and 3-year PeVD recurrence rates. The pain intensity was assessed before and after the procedure using a visual analogue scale. All patients underwent duplex ultrasound after the procedure, and those with persisting pain and suspected gonadal vein perforation with coil were also examined using computed tomographic venography. RESULTS: A substantial pelvic pain relief was achieved within 30 d after GVE and GVR in 73% and 100% patients, accordingly (Р = 0.001). Complications after GVE were identified in 85 (56%) patients. The major complications included pelvic vein thrombosis (PVT) and calf deep vein thrombosis (24%), postembolization syndrome (22%), and coil protrusion (5.3%). Complications after GVR occurred in 14 (11%) patients and consisted of PVT (10%) and ileus (1.6%). The 3-year recurrence rates after GVE and GVR were 11% and 5%, accordingly (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PeVD, the gonadal vein embolization with coils is associated with a high complication rate, which can be reduced with further development of the GVE technique, the use of new embolic agents, and the selection of a treatment method based on the patient's body composition.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Várices , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Venas , Pelvis/irrigación sanguínea , Dolor Pélvico/complicaciones , Dolor Pélvico/terapia , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Pers Med ; 12(11)2022 Nov 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36422109

RESUMEN

Background: The efficacy and safety of gonadal vein embolization (GVE) with coils in the treatment of pelvic venous disease (PeVD) has not been fully investigated, and the outcomes after GVE do not always meet expectations of both doctors and patients. The study was aimed at assessing the incidence and causes of the complications after GVE with coils in patients with PeVD. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 150 female patients with PeVD who underwent GVE with coils in 2000-2020. A total of 4975 patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) were examined, of which 1107 patients had the PeVD-related CPP and 305 underwent surgical or endovascular interventions on the gonadal veins. Complication rates were evaluated 30 days after GVE and classified according to the Society for Interventional Radiology (SIR) adverse event classification system. The pain severity before and after GVE was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). All patients underwent duplex ultrasound after GVE, while patients with persisting pain syndrome and suspected perforation of the gonadal vein were also evaluated using computed tomographic venography. Results: At 30 days after GVE, the CPP was decreased in 109 (72.6%) patients (from 8.2 ± 1.5 at baseline to 1.7 ± 0.8 scores, p = 0.0001) and persisted in 41 (27.4%) patients (mean change from 8.1 ± 0.7 at baseline to 7.8 ± 0.4 scores; p = 0.71). Post-embolic syndrome (PES) occurred in 22% of patients and was completely resolved in 1 month after GVE. The efficacy of GVE in the CPP relief after resolving PES was 94.6%. The GVE complications were identified in 52 (34.6%) patients. Minor complications included access-site hematoma (4%) and allergic reactions (1.3%), and major complications included protrusion of coils (5.3%), thrombosis of the parametrial/uterine veins (21.3%) and deep veins of the calf (2.7%). Conclusions: Gonadal vein embolization with coils in the treatment of PeVD is associated with the development of specific complications and adverse events. The most common complication was pelvic vein thrombosis. Post-embolization syndrome should be considered as an adverse event of this procedure.

3.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord ; 9(3): 697-702, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32932000

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluated the incidence of postembolization syndrome (PES) after endovascular coil embolization of the gonadal veins (EEGV) in patients with pelvic congestion syndrome and investigated the appropriate medical treatment. METHODS: EEGV was performed in 70 female patients with pelvic congestion syndrome (left-sided in 58, right-sided in 3, and bilateral in 9 patients). For embolization, 0.035-in. coils with an 8- to 12-mm diameter and 10- to 20-cm length were used. Assessments of the EEGV results and possible PES symptoms were performed on days 1, 5, 10, 20, and 30 after the procedure and included transvaginal and transabdominal duplex ultrasound scanning of the pelvic veins and at the embolization site. RESULTS: PES had manifested with increased pelvic pain, tenderness along the embolized vein, and hyperthermia ≤37.5°C to 37.8°C and had developed in 14 patients (20%). For PES treatment, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (diclofenac, 75 mg daily for 3-7 days; mean, 4.2 ± 1.1 days) and a venoactive drug (micronized purified flavonoid fraction, 1000 mg daily for 2 months) were used. Medical treatment was associated with a significant reduction in PES symptoms in all patients within 14 days and complete resolution by day 30 after embolization. duplex ultrasound scanning revealed thrombosis of parametrial veins in 12 of 56 patients (21.4%) with successful EEGV and 3 of 14 patients (21.4%) with PES. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who have undergone EEGV, increased pelvic pain, the occurrence of tenderness along the embolized vein, and the presence of hyperthermia should be considered as PES manifestations. In our study, PES occurred in 20% of the treated patients.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Hipertermia/etiología , Ovario/irrigación sanguínea , Dolor Pélvico/etiología , Venas , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Embolización Terapéutica/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertermia/diagnóstico , Hipertermia/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Pélvico/diagnóstico , Dolor Pélvico/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Síndrome , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Venas/diagnóstico por imagen
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA