Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Infect Chemother ; 14(1): 59-61, 2008 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18297452

RESUMEN

To date, few cases of extraintestinal infection with Clostridium difficile have been reported. We describe a case of surgical-site infection with C. difficile following a colonic operation. Administration of metronidazole was considered to be effective for treatment of the infection. The isolate was a toxin A-nonproducing and toxin B-producing strain.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Toxinas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/microbiología , Enterotoxinas/metabolismo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Clostridioides difficile/clasificación , Colon/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paresia/diagnóstico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/complicaciones , Factores de Virulencia
2.
J Infect Chemother ; 13(1): 35-8, 2007 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17334727

RESUMEN

In Japan, many clinical laboratories may not have recognized toxin A-nonproducing/toxin B-producing (A-/B+) Clostridium difficile, because rapid diagnostic kits detecting toxin B of C. difficile have not been available in the laboratories. Therefore, we examined the prevalence of A-/B+ strains in the Tsukuba-Tsuchiura district, Japan. Fecal specimens submitted for C. difficile toxin tests in four tertiary hospitals in the district were collected for 6 months. Several C. difficile A-/B+ strains, isolated in two nosocomial outbreaks that had occurred in geographically distant areas in Japan, were also simultaneously analyzed as controls. C. difficile was isolated from 159 of 332 specimens collected. Ten (6.3%) of the 159 C. difficile strains were A-/B+ strains. Nine A-/B+ strains, isolated in one hospital, had an identical genomic pattern by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotyping and macrorestriction analysis with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). The A-/B+ strain isolated in another hospital and some of those in the geographically distant hospitals were indistinguishable from the nine strains by PCR ribotyping but were distinguishable with PFGE analysis. We concluded that A-/B+ strains are not epidemic in this district and that PFGE analysis may be preferable to PCR ribotyping for the genotyping of C. difficile A-/B+ strains. The reason why most of the A-/B+ strains were detected in the one hospital was unclear.


Asunto(s)
Toxinas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Clostridioides difficile/metabolismo , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Heces/microbiología , Toxinas Bacterianas/análisis , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/métodos , Clostridioides difficile/clasificación , Infecciones por Clostridium/clasificación , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Estudios Transversales , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Enterotoxinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Prevalencia , Ribotipificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA